com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect.POJOPropertyBuilder Maven / Gradle / Ivy
Show all versions of jackson-databind Show documentation
package com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonSetter;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.Nulls;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.*;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.cfg.ConfigOverride;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.cfg.MapperConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.type.TypeFactory;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.ClassUtil;
/**
* Helper class used for aggregating information about a single
* potential POJO property.
*/
public class POJOPropertyBuilder
extends BeanPropertyDefinition
implements Comparable
{
/**
* Marker value used to denote that no reference-property information found for
* this property
*
* @since 2.9
*/
private final static AnnotationIntrospector.ReferenceProperty NOT_REFEFERENCE_PROP =
AnnotationIntrospector.ReferenceProperty.managed("");
/**
* Whether property is being composed for serialization
* (true) or deserialization (false)
*/
protected final boolean _forSerialization;
protected final MapperConfig _config;
protected final AnnotationIntrospector _annotationIntrospector;
/**
* External name of logical property; may change with
* renaming (by new instance being constructed using
* a new name)
*/
protected final PropertyName _name;
/**
* Original internal name, derived from accessor, of this
* property. Will not be changed by renaming.
*/
protected final PropertyName _internalName;
protected Linked _fields;
protected Linked _ctorParameters;
protected Linked _getters;
protected Linked _setters;
protected transient PropertyMetadata _metadata;
/**
* Lazily accessed information about this property iff it is a forward or
* back reference.
*
* @since 2.9
*/
protected transient AnnotationIntrospector.ReferenceProperty _referenceInfo;
public POJOPropertyBuilder(MapperConfig config, AnnotationIntrospector ai,
boolean forSerialization, PropertyName internalName) {
this(config, ai, forSerialization, internalName, internalName);
}
protected POJOPropertyBuilder(MapperConfig config, AnnotationIntrospector ai,
boolean forSerialization, PropertyName internalName, PropertyName name)
{
_config = config;
_annotationIntrospector = ai;
_internalName = internalName;
_name = name;
_forSerialization = forSerialization;
}
// protected since 2.9 (was public before)
protected POJOPropertyBuilder(POJOPropertyBuilder src, PropertyName newName)
{
_config = src._config;
_annotationIntrospector = src._annotationIntrospector;
_internalName = src._internalName;
_name = newName;
_fields = src._fields;
_ctorParameters = src._ctorParameters;
_getters = src._getters;
_setters = src._setters;
_forSerialization = src._forSerialization;
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Mutant factory methods
/**********************************************************
*/
@Override
public POJOPropertyBuilder withName(PropertyName newName) {
return new POJOPropertyBuilder(this, newName);
}
@Override
public POJOPropertyBuilder withSimpleName(String newSimpleName)
{
PropertyName newName = _name.withSimpleName(newSimpleName);
return (newName == _name) ? this : new POJOPropertyBuilder(this, newName);
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Comparable implementation: sort alphabetically, except
/* that properties with constructor parameters sorted
/* before other properties
/**********************************************************
*/
@Override
public int compareTo(POJOPropertyBuilder other)
{
// first, if one has ctor params, that should come first:
if (_ctorParameters != null) {
if (other._ctorParameters == null) {
return -1;
}
} else if (other._ctorParameters != null) {
return 1;
}
/* otherwise sort by external name (including sorting of
* ctor parameters)
*/
return getName().compareTo(other.getName());
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* BeanPropertyDefinition implementation, name/type
/**********************************************************
*/
@Override
public String getName() {
return (_name == null) ? null : _name.getSimpleName();
}
@Override
public PropertyName getFullName() {
return _name;
}
@Override
public boolean hasName(PropertyName name) {
return _name.equals(name);
}
@Override
public String getInternalName() { return _internalName.getSimpleName(); }
@Override
public PropertyName getWrapperName() {
/* 13-Mar-2013, tatu: Accessing via primary member SHOULD work,
* due to annotation merging. However, I have seen some problems
* with this access (for other annotations)... so if this should
* occur, try commenting out full traversal code
*/
AnnotatedMember member = getPrimaryMember();
return (member == null || _annotationIntrospector == null) ? null
: _annotationIntrospector.findWrapperName(member);
/*
return fromMemberAnnotations(new WithMember() {
@Override
public PropertyName withMember(AnnotatedMember member) {
return _annotationIntrospector.findWrapperName(member);
}
});
*/
}
@Override
public boolean isExplicitlyIncluded() {
return _anyExplicits(_fields)
|| _anyExplicits(_getters)
|| _anyExplicits(_setters)
// 16-Jan-2016, tatu: Creator names are special, in that name should exist too;
// reason for this is [databind#1317]. Let's hope this works well, may need
// to tweak further if this lowers visibility
// || _anyExplicits(_ctorParameters)
|| _anyExplicitNames(_ctorParameters)
;
}
@Override
public boolean isExplicitlyNamed() {
return _anyExplicitNames(_fields)
|| _anyExplicitNames(_getters)
|| _anyExplicitNames(_setters)
|| _anyExplicitNames(_ctorParameters)
;
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Simple metadata
/**********************************************************
*/
@Override
public PropertyMetadata getMetadata()
{
if (_metadata == null) {
// 20-Jun-2020, tatu: Unfortunately strict checks lead to [databind#2757]
// so we will need to try to avoid them at this point
final AnnotatedMember prim = getPrimaryMemberUnchecked();
if (prim == null) {
_metadata = PropertyMetadata.STD_REQUIRED_OR_OPTIONAL;
} else {
final Boolean b = _annotationIntrospector.hasRequiredMarker(prim);
final String desc = _annotationIntrospector.findPropertyDescription(prim);
final Integer idx = _annotationIntrospector.findPropertyIndex(prim);
final String def = _annotationIntrospector.findPropertyDefaultValue(prim);
if (b == null && idx == null && def == null) {
_metadata = (desc == null) ? PropertyMetadata.STD_REQUIRED_OR_OPTIONAL
: PropertyMetadata.STD_REQUIRED_OR_OPTIONAL.withDescription(desc);
} else {
_metadata = PropertyMetadata.construct(b, desc, idx, def);
}
if (!_forSerialization) {
_metadata = _getSetterInfo(_metadata, prim);
}
}
}
return _metadata;
}
/**
* Helper method that contains logic for accessing and merging all setter
* information that we needed, regarding things like possible merging
* of property value, and handling of incoming nulls.
* Only called for deserialization purposes.
*/
protected PropertyMetadata _getSetterInfo(PropertyMetadata metadata,
AnnotatedMember primary)
{
boolean needMerge = true;
Nulls valueNulls = null;
Nulls contentNulls = null;
// Slightly confusing: first, annotations should be accessed via primary member
// (mutator); but accessor is needed for actual merge operation. So
AnnotatedMember acc = getAccessor();
if (primary != null) {
// Ok, first: does property itself have something to say?
if (_annotationIntrospector != null) {
if (acc != null) {
Boolean b = _annotationIntrospector.findMergeInfo(primary);
if (b != null) {
needMerge = false;
if (b.booleanValue()) {
metadata = metadata.withMergeInfo(PropertyMetadata.MergeInfo.createForPropertyOverride(acc));
}
}
}
JsonSetter.Value setterInfo = _annotationIntrospector.findSetterInfo(primary);
if (setterInfo != null) {
valueNulls = setterInfo.nonDefaultValueNulls();
contentNulls = setterInfo.nonDefaultContentNulls();
}
}
// If not, config override?
// 25-Oct-2016, tatu: Either this, or type of accessor...
if (needMerge || (valueNulls == null) || (contentNulls == null)) {
// 20-Jun-2020, tatu: Related to [databind#2757], need to find type
// but keeping mind that type for setters is trickier; and that
// generic typing gets tricky as well.
Class rawType = _rawTypeOf(primary);
ConfigOverride co = _config.getConfigOverride(rawType);
JsonSetter.Value setterInfo = co.getSetterInfo();
if (setterInfo != null) {
if (valueNulls == null) {
valueNulls = setterInfo.nonDefaultValueNulls();
}
if (contentNulls == null) {
contentNulls = setterInfo.nonDefaultContentNulls();
}
}
if (needMerge && (acc != null)) {
Boolean b = co.getMergeable();
if (b != null) {
needMerge = false;
if (b.booleanValue()) {
metadata = metadata.withMergeInfo(PropertyMetadata.MergeInfo.createForTypeOverride(acc));
}
}
}
}
}
if (needMerge || (valueNulls == null) || (contentNulls == null)) {
JsonSetter.Value setterInfo = _config.getDefaultSetterInfo();
if (valueNulls == null) {
valueNulls = setterInfo.nonDefaultValueNulls();
}
if (contentNulls == null) {
contentNulls = setterInfo.nonDefaultContentNulls();
}
if (needMerge) {
Boolean b = _config.getDefaultMergeable();
if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(b) && (acc != null)) {
metadata = metadata.withMergeInfo(PropertyMetadata.MergeInfo.createForDefaults(acc));
}
}
}
if ((valueNulls != null) || (contentNulls != null)) {
metadata = metadata.withNulls(valueNulls, contentNulls);
}
return metadata;
}
/**
* Type determined from the primary member for the property being built,
* considering precedence according to whether we are processing serialization
* or deserialization.
*/
@Override
public JavaType getPrimaryType() {
if (_forSerialization) {
AnnotatedMember m = getGetter();
if (m == null) {
m = getField();
if (m == null) {
// 09-Feb-2017, tatu: Not sure if this or `null` but...
return TypeFactory.unknownType();
}
}
return m.getType();
}
AnnotatedMember m = getConstructorParameter();
if (m == null) {
m = getSetter();
// Important: can't try direct type access for setter; what we need is
// type of the first parameter
if (m != null) {
return ((AnnotatedMethod) m).getParameterType(0);
}
m = getField();
}
// for setterless properties, however, can further try getter
if (m == null) {
m = getGetter();
if (m == null) {
return TypeFactory.unknownType();
}
}
return m.getType();
}
@Override
public Class getRawPrimaryType() {
return getPrimaryType().getRawClass();
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* BeanPropertyDefinition implementation, accessor access
/**********************************************************
*/
@Override
public boolean hasGetter() { return _getters != null; }
@Override
public boolean hasSetter() { return _setters != null; }
@Override
public boolean hasField() { return _fields != null; }
@Override
public boolean hasConstructorParameter() { return _ctorParameters != null; }
@Override
public boolean couldDeserialize() {
return (_ctorParameters != null) || (_setters != null) || (_fields != null);
}
@Override
public boolean couldSerialize() {
return (_getters != null) || (_fields != null);
}
@Override
public AnnotatedMethod getGetter()
{
// Easy with zero or one getters...
Linked curr = _getters;
if (curr == null) {
return null;
}
Linked next = curr.next;
if (next == null) {
return curr.value;
}
// But if multiple, verify that they do not conflict...
for (; next != null; next = next.next) {
/* [JACKSON-255] Allow masking, i.e. do not report exception if one
* is in super-class from the other
*/
Class currClass = curr.value.getDeclaringClass();
Class nextClass = next.value.getDeclaringClass();
if (currClass != nextClass) {
if (currClass.isAssignableFrom(nextClass)) { // next is more specific
curr = next;
continue;
}
if (nextClass.isAssignableFrom(currClass)) { // current more specific
continue;
}
}
/* 30-May-2014, tatu: Three levels of precedence:
*
* 1. Regular getters ("getX")
* 2. Is-getters ("isX")
* 3. Implicit, possible getters ("x")
*/
int priNext = _getterPriority(next.value);
int priCurr = _getterPriority(curr.value);
if (priNext != priCurr) {
if (priNext < priCurr) {
curr = next;
}
continue;
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Conflicting getter definitions for property \""+getName()+"\": "
+curr.value.getFullName()+" vs "+next.value.getFullName());
}
// One more thing; to avoid having to do it again...
_getters = curr.withoutNext();
return curr.value;
}
@Override
public AnnotatedMethod getSetter()
{
// Easy with zero or one setters...
Linked curr = _setters;
if (curr == null) {
return null;
}
Linked next = curr.next;
if (next == null) {
return curr.value;
}
// But if multiple, verify that they do not conflict...
for (; next != null; next = next.next) {
AnnotatedMethod selected = _selectSetter(curr.value, next.value);
if (selected == curr.value) {
continue;
}
if (selected == next.value) {
curr = next;
continue;
}
// 10-May-2021, tatu: unbreakable tie, for now; offline handling
return _selectSetterFromMultiple(curr, next);
}
// One more thing; to avoid having to do it again...
_setters = curr.withoutNext();
return curr.value;
}
/**
* Helper method called in cases where we have encountered two setter methods
* that have same precedence and cannot be resolved. This does not yet necessarily
* mean a failure since it is possible something with a higher precedence could
* still be found; handling is just separated into separate method for convenience.
*
* @param curr
* @param next
*
* @return Chosen setter method, if any
*
* @throws IllegalArgumentException If conflict could not be resolved
*
* @since 2.13
*/
protected AnnotatedMethod _selectSetterFromMultiple(Linked curr,
Linked next)
{
// First: store reference to the initial possible conflict
List conflicts = new ArrayList<>();
conflicts.add(curr.value);
conflicts.add(next.value);
next = next.next;
for (; next != null; next = next.next) {
AnnotatedMethod selected = _selectSetter(curr.value, next.value);
if (selected == curr.value) {
// No change, next was lower-precedence
continue;
}
if (selected == next.value) {
// Hooray! Found a higher-priority one; clear conflict list
conflicts.clear();
curr = next;
continue;
}
// Tie means one more non-resolved, add
conflicts.add(next.value);
}
// It is possible we resolved it; if so:
if (conflicts.isEmpty()) {
_setters = curr.withoutNext();
return curr.value;
}
// Otherwise
String desc = conflicts.stream().map(AnnotatedMethod::getFullName)
.collect(Collectors.joining(" vs "));
throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.format(
"Conflicting setter definitions for property \"%s\": %s",
getName(), desc));
}
// @since 2.13
protected AnnotatedMethod _selectSetter(AnnotatedMethod currM, AnnotatedMethod nextM)
{
// Allow masking, i.e. do not fail if one is in super-class from the other
final Class currClass = currM.getDeclaringClass();
final Class nextClass = nextM.getDeclaringClass();
if (currClass != nextClass) {
if (currClass.isAssignableFrom(nextClass)) { // next is more specific
return nextM;
}
if (nextClass.isAssignableFrom(currClass)) { // current more specific
return currM;
}
}
/* 30-May-2014, tatu: Two levels of precedence:
*
* 1. Regular setters ("setX(...)")
* 2. Implicit, possible setters ("x(...)")
*/
// 25-Apr-2021, tatu: This is probably wrong, should not rely on
// hard-coded "set" prefix here.
int priNext = _setterPriority(nextM);
int priCurr = _setterPriority(currM);
if (priNext != priCurr) {
// Smaller value, higher; so, if next has higher precedence:
if (priNext < priCurr) {
return nextM;
}
// otherwise current one has, proceed
return currM;
}
// 11-Dec-2015, tatu: As per [databind#1033] allow pluggable conflict resolution
return (_annotationIntrospector == null) ? null
: _annotationIntrospector.resolveSetterConflict(_config, currM, nextM);
}
@Override
public AnnotatedField getField()
{
if (_fields == null) {
return null;
}
// If multiple, verify that they do not conflict...
AnnotatedField field = _fields.value;
Linked next = _fields.next;
for (; next != null; next = next.next) {
AnnotatedField nextField = next.value;
Class fieldClass = field.getDeclaringClass();
Class nextClass = nextField.getDeclaringClass();
if (fieldClass != nextClass) {
if (fieldClass.isAssignableFrom(nextClass)) { // next is more specific
field = nextField;
continue;
}
if (nextClass.isAssignableFrom(fieldClass)) { // getter more specific
continue;
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Multiple fields representing property \""+getName()+"\": "
+field.getFullName()+" vs "+nextField.getFullName());
}
return field;
}
@Override
public AnnotatedParameter getConstructorParameter()
{
if (_ctorParameters == null) {
return null;
}
/* Hmmh. Checking for constructor parameters is trickier; for one,
* we must allow creator and factory method annotations.
* If this is the case, constructor parameter has the precedence.
*
* So, for now, just try finding the first constructor parameter;
* if none, first factory method. And don't check for dups, if we must,
* can start checking for them later on.
*/
Linked curr = _ctorParameters;
do {
if (curr.value.getOwner() instanceof AnnotatedConstructor) {
return curr.value;
}
curr = curr.next;
} while (curr != null);
return _ctorParameters.value;
}
@Override
public Iterator getConstructorParameters() {
if (_ctorParameters == null) {
return ClassUtil.emptyIterator();
}
return new MemberIterator(_ctorParameters);
}
@Override
public AnnotatedMember getPrimaryMember() {
if (_forSerialization) {
return getAccessor();
}
AnnotatedMember m = getMutator();
// for setterless properties, however...
if (m == null) {
m = getAccessor();
}
return m;
}
// Sometimes we need to actually by-pass failures related to conflicting
// getters or setters (see [databind#2757] for specific example); if so,
// this method is to be used instead of `getPrimaryMember()`
// @since 2.11.1
protected AnnotatedMember getPrimaryMemberUnchecked() {
if (_forSerialization) { // Inlined `getAccessor()` logic:
// Inlined `getGetter()`:
if (_getters != null) {
return _getters.value;
}
// Inlined `getField()`:
if (_fields != null) {
return _fields.value;
}
return null;
}
// Otherwise, inlined `getMutator()` logic:
// Inlined `getConstructorParameter()`:
if (_ctorParameters != null) {
return _ctorParameters.value;
}
// Inlined `getSetter()`:
if (_setters != null) {
return _setters.value;
}
// Inlined `getField()`:
if (_fields != null) {
return _fields.value;
}
// but to support setterless-properties, also include part of
// `getAccessor()` not yet covered, `getGetter()`:
if (_getters != null) {
return _getters.value;
}
return null;
}
protected int _getterPriority(AnnotatedMethod m)
{
final String name = m.getName();
// [databind#238]: Also, regular getters have precedence over "is-getters"
if (name.startsWith("get") && name.length() > 3) {
// should we check capitalization?
return 1;
}
if (name.startsWith("is") && name.length() > 2) {
return 2;
}
return 3;
}
protected int _setterPriority(AnnotatedMethod m)
{
final String name = m.getName();
if (name.startsWith("set") && name.length() > 3) {
// should we check capitalization?
return 1;
}
return 2;
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Implementations of refinement accessors
/**********************************************************
*/
@Override
public Class[] findViews() {
return fromMemberAnnotations(new WithMember[]>() {
@Override
public Class[] withMember(AnnotatedMember member) {
return _annotationIntrospector.findViews(member);
}
});
}
@Override
public AnnotationIntrospector.ReferenceProperty findReferenceType() {
// 30-Mar-2017, tatu: Access lazily but retain information since it needs
// to be accessed multiple times during processing.
AnnotationIntrospector.ReferenceProperty result = _referenceInfo;
if (result != null) {
if (result == NOT_REFEFERENCE_PROP) {
return null;
}
return result;
}
result = fromMemberAnnotations(new WithMember() {
@Override
public AnnotationIntrospector.ReferenceProperty withMember(AnnotatedMember member) {
return _annotationIntrospector.findReferenceType(member);
}
});
_referenceInfo = (result == null) ? NOT_REFEFERENCE_PROP : result;
return result;
}
@Override
public boolean isTypeId() {
Boolean b = fromMemberAnnotations(new WithMember() {
@Override
public Boolean withMember(AnnotatedMember member) {
return _annotationIntrospector.isTypeId(member);
}
});
return (b != null) && b.booleanValue();
}
@Override
public ObjectIdInfo findObjectIdInfo() {
return fromMemberAnnotations(new WithMember() {
@Override
public ObjectIdInfo withMember(AnnotatedMember member) {
ObjectIdInfo info = _annotationIntrospector.findObjectIdInfo(member);
if (info != null) {
info = _annotationIntrospector.findObjectReferenceInfo(member, info);
}
return info;
}
});
}
@Override
public JsonInclude.Value findInclusion() {
AnnotatedMember a = getAccessor();
// 16-Apr-2106, tatu: Let's include per-type default inclusion too
// 17-Aug-2016, tatu: Do NOT include global, or per-type defaults, because
// not all of this information (specifically, enclosing type's settings)
// is available here
JsonInclude.Value v = (_annotationIntrospector == null) ?
null : _annotationIntrospector.findPropertyInclusion(a);
return (v == null) ? JsonInclude.Value.empty() : v;
}
public JsonProperty.Access findAccess() {
return fromMemberAnnotationsExcept(new WithMember() {
@Override
public JsonProperty.Access withMember(AnnotatedMember member) {
return _annotationIntrospector.findPropertyAccess(member);
}
}, JsonProperty.Access.AUTO);
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Data aggregation
/**********************************************************
*/
public void addField(AnnotatedField a, PropertyName name, boolean explName, boolean visible, boolean ignored) {
_fields = new Linked(a, _fields, name, explName, visible, ignored);
}
public void addCtor(AnnotatedParameter a, PropertyName name, boolean explName, boolean visible, boolean ignored) {
_ctorParameters = new Linked(a, _ctorParameters, name, explName, visible, ignored);
}
public void addGetter(AnnotatedMethod a, PropertyName name, boolean explName, boolean visible, boolean ignored) {
_getters = new Linked(a, _getters, name, explName, visible, ignored);
}
public void addSetter(AnnotatedMethod a, PropertyName name, boolean explName, boolean visible, boolean ignored) {
_setters = new Linked(a, _setters, name, explName, visible, ignored);
}
/**
* Method for adding all property members from specified collector into
* this collector.
*/
public void addAll(POJOPropertyBuilder src)
{
_fields = merge(_fields, src._fields);
_ctorParameters = merge(_ctorParameters, src._ctorParameters);
_getters= merge(_getters, src._getters);
_setters = merge(_setters, src._setters);
}
private static Linked merge(Linked chain1, Linked chain2)
{
if (chain1 == null) {
return chain2;
}
if (chain2 == null) {
return chain1;
}
return chain1.append(chain2);
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Modifications
/**********************************************************
*/
/**
* Method called to remove all entries that are marked as
* ignored.
*/
public void removeIgnored()
{
_fields = _removeIgnored(_fields);
_getters = _removeIgnored(_getters);
_setters = _removeIgnored(_setters);
_ctorParameters = _removeIgnored(_ctorParameters);
}
@Deprecated // since 2.12
public JsonProperty.Access removeNonVisible(boolean inferMutators) {
return removeNonVisible(inferMutators, null);
}
/**
* @param inferMutators Whether mutators can be "pulled in" by visible
* accessors or not.
*
* @since 2.12 (earlier had different signature)
*/
public JsonProperty.Access removeNonVisible(boolean inferMutators,
POJOPropertiesCollector parent)
{
/* 07-Jun-2015, tatu: With 2.6, we will allow optional definition
* of explicit access type for property; if not "AUTO", it will
* dictate how visibility checks are applied.
*/
JsonProperty.Access acc = findAccess();
if (acc == null) {
acc = JsonProperty.Access.AUTO;
}
switch (acc) {
case READ_ONLY:
// [databind#2719]: Need to add ignorals, first, keeping in mind
// we have not yet resolved explicit names, so include implicit
// and possible explicit names
if (parent != null) {
parent._collectIgnorals(getName());
for (PropertyName pn : findExplicitNames()) {
parent._collectIgnorals(pn.getSimpleName());
}
}
// Remove setters, creators for sure, but fields too if deserializing
_setters = null;
_ctorParameters = null;
if (!_forSerialization) {
_fields = null;
}
break;
case READ_WRITE:
// no trimming whatsoever?
break;
case WRITE_ONLY:
// remove getters, definitely, but also fields if serializing
_getters = null;
if (_forSerialization) {
_fields = null;
}
break;
default:
case AUTO: // the default case: base it on visibility
_getters = _removeNonVisible(_getters);
_ctorParameters = _removeNonVisible(_ctorParameters);
if (!inferMutators || (_getters == null)) {
_fields = _removeNonVisible(_fields);
_setters = _removeNonVisible(_setters);
}
}
return acc;
}
/**
* Mutator that will simply drop any constructor parameters property may have.
*
* @since 2.5
*/
public void removeConstructors() {
_ctorParameters = null;
}
/**
* Method called to trim unnecessary entries, such as implicit
* getter if there is an explict one available. This is important
* for later stages, to avoid unnecessary conflicts.
*/
public void trimByVisibility()
{
_fields = _trimByVisibility(_fields);
_getters = _trimByVisibility(_getters);
_setters = _trimByVisibility(_setters);
_ctorParameters = _trimByVisibility(_ctorParameters);
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public void mergeAnnotations(boolean forSerialization)
{
if (forSerialization) {
if (_getters != null) {
AnnotationMap ann = _mergeAnnotations(0, _getters, _fields, _ctorParameters, _setters);
_getters = _applyAnnotations(_getters, ann);
} else if (_fields != null) {
AnnotationMap ann = _mergeAnnotations(0, _fields, _ctorParameters, _setters);
_fields = _applyAnnotations(_fields, ann);
}
} else { // for deserialization
if (_ctorParameters != null) {
AnnotationMap ann = _mergeAnnotations(0, _ctorParameters, _setters, _fields, _getters);
_ctorParameters = _applyAnnotations(_ctorParameters, ann);
} else if (_setters != null) {
AnnotationMap ann = _mergeAnnotations(0, _setters, _fields, _getters);
_setters = _applyAnnotations(_setters, ann);
} else if (_fields != null) {
AnnotationMap ann = _mergeAnnotations(0, _fields, _getters);
_fields = _applyAnnotations(_fields, ann);
}
}
}
private AnnotationMap _mergeAnnotations(int index,
Linked... nodes)
{
AnnotationMap ann = _getAllAnnotations(nodes[index]);
while (++index < nodes.length) {
if (nodes[index] != null) {
return AnnotationMap.merge(ann, _mergeAnnotations(index, nodes));
}
}
return ann;
}
/**
* Replacement, as per [databind#868], of simple access to annotations, which
* does "deep merge" if an as necessary.
*
* nodes[index].value.getAllAnnotations()
*
*
* @since 2.6
*/
private AnnotationMap _getAllAnnotations(Linked node) {
AnnotationMap ann = node.value.getAllAnnotations();
if (node.next != null) {
ann = AnnotationMap.merge(ann, _getAllAnnotations(node.next));
}
return ann;
}
/**
* Helper method to handle recursive merging of annotations within accessor class,
* to ensure no annotations are accidentally dropped within chain when non-visible
* and secondary accessors are pruned later on.
*
* See [databind#868] for more information.
*
* @since 2.6
*/
private Linked _applyAnnotations(Linked node, AnnotationMap ann) {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
T value = (T) node.value.withAnnotations(ann);
if (node.next != null) {
node = node.withNext(_applyAnnotations(node.next, ann));
}
return node.withValue(value);
}
private Linked _removeIgnored(Linked node)
{
if (node == null) {
return node;
}
return node.withoutIgnored();
}
private Linked _removeNonVisible(Linked node)
{
if (node == null) {
return node;
}
return node.withoutNonVisible();
}
private Linked _trimByVisibility(Linked node)
{
if (node == null) {
return node;
}
return node.trimByVisibility();
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Accessors for aggregate information
/**********************************************************
*/
private boolean _anyExplicits(Linked n)
{
for (; n != null; n = n.next) {
if (n.name != null && n.name.hasSimpleName()) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
private boolean _anyExplicitNames(Linked n)
{
for (; n != null; n = n.next) {
if (n.name != null && n.isNameExplicit) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
public boolean anyVisible() {
return _anyVisible(_fields)
|| _anyVisible(_getters)
|| _anyVisible(_setters)
|| _anyVisible(_ctorParameters)
;
}
private boolean _anyVisible(Linked n)
{
for (; n != null; n = n.next) {
if (n.isVisible) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
public boolean anyIgnorals() {
return _anyIgnorals(_fields)
|| _anyIgnorals(_getters)
|| _anyIgnorals(_setters)
|| _anyIgnorals(_ctorParameters)
;
}
private boolean _anyIgnorals(Linked n)
{
for (; n != null; n = n.next) {
if (n.isMarkedIgnored) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/**
* Method called to find out set of explicit names for accessors
* bound together due to implicit name.
*
* @since 2.4
*/
public Set findExplicitNames()
{
Set renamed = null;
renamed = _findExplicitNames(_fields, renamed);
renamed = _findExplicitNames(_getters, renamed);
renamed = _findExplicitNames(_setters, renamed);
renamed = _findExplicitNames(_ctorParameters, renamed);
if (renamed == null) {
return Collections.emptySet();
}
return renamed;
}
/**
* Method called when a previous call to {@link #findExplicitNames} found
* multiple distinct explicit names, and the property this builder represents
* basically needs to be broken apart and replaced by a set of more than
* one properties.
*
* @since 2.4
*/
public Collection explode(Collection newNames)
{
HashMap props = new HashMap();
_explode(newNames, props, _fields);
_explode(newNames, props, _getters);
_explode(newNames, props, _setters);
_explode(newNames, props, _ctorParameters);
return props.values();
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private void _explode(Collection newNames,
Map props,
Linked accessors)
{
final Linked firstAcc = accessors; // clumsy, part 1
for (Linked node = accessors; node != null; node = node.next) {
PropertyName name = node.name;
if (!node.isNameExplicit || name == null) { // no explicit name -- problem!
// [databind#541] ... but only as long as it's visible
if (!node.isVisible) {
continue;
}
throw new IllegalStateException("Conflicting/ambiguous property name definitions (implicit name "
+ClassUtil.name(_name)+"): found multiple explicit names: "
+newNames+", but also implicit accessor: "+node);
}
POJOPropertyBuilder prop = props.get(name);
if (prop == null) {
prop = new POJOPropertyBuilder(_config, _annotationIntrospector, _forSerialization,
_internalName, name);
props.put(name, prop);
}
// ultra-clumsy, part 2 -- lambdas would be nice here
if (firstAcc == _fields) {
Linked n2 = (Linked) node;
prop._fields = n2.withNext(prop._fields);
} else if (firstAcc == _getters) {
Linked n2 = (Linked) node;
prop._getters = n2.withNext(prop._getters);
} else if (firstAcc == _setters) {
Linked n2 = (Linked) node;
prop._setters = n2.withNext(prop._setters);
} else if (firstAcc == _ctorParameters) {
Linked n2 = (Linked) node;
prop._ctorParameters = n2.withNext(prop._ctorParameters);
} else {
throw new IllegalStateException("Internal error: mismatched accessors, property: "+this);
}
}
}
private Set _findExplicitNames(Linked node,
Set renamed)
{
for (; node != null; node = node.next) {
/* 30-Mar-2014, tatu: Second check should not be needed, but seems like
* removing it can cause nasty exceptions with certain version
* combinations (2.4 databind, an older module).
* So leaving it in for now until this is resolved
* (or version beyond 2.4)
*/
if (!node.isNameExplicit || node.name == null) {
continue;
}
if (renamed == null) {
renamed = new HashSet();
}
renamed.add(node.name);
}
return renamed;
}
// For trouble-shooting
@Override
public String toString()
{
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append("[Property '").append(_name)
.append("'; ctors: ").append(_ctorParameters)
.append(", field(s): ").append(_fields)
.append(", getter(s): ").append(_getters)
.append(", setter(s): ").append(_setters)
;
sb.append("]");
return sb.toString();
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Helper methods
/**********************************************************
*/
/**
* Helper method used for finding annotation values, from accessors
* relevant to current usage (deserialization, serialization)
*/
protected T fromMemberAnnotations(WithMember func)
{
T result = null;
if (_annotationIntrospector != null) {
if (_forSerialization) {
if (_getters != null) {
result = func.withMember(_getters.value);
}
} else {
if (_ctorParameters != null) {
result = func.withMember(_ctorParameters.value);
}
if (result == null && _setters != null) {
result = func.withMember(_setters.value);
}
}
if (result == null && _fields != null) {
result = func.withMember(_fields.value);
}
}
return result;
}
protected T fromMemberAnnotationsExcept(WithMember func, T defaultValue)
{
if (_annotationIntrospector == null) {
return null;
}
// NOTE: here we must ask ALL accessors, but the order varies between
// serialization, deserialization
if (_forSerialization) {
if (_getters != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_getters.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
if (_fields != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_fields.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
if (_ctorParameters != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_ctorParameters.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
if (_setters != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_setters.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
return null;
}
if (_ctorParameters != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_ctorParameters.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
if (_setters != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_setters.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
if (_fields != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_fields.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
if (_getters != null) {
T result = func.withMember(_getters.value);
if ((result != null) && (result != defaultValue)) {
return result;
}
}
return null;
}
// Helper method needed to work around oddity in type access for
// `AnnotatedMethod`.
//
// @since 2.11.1
protected Class _rawTypeOf(AnnotatedMember m) {
// AnnotatedMethod always returns return type, but for setters we
// actually need argument type
if (m instanceof AnnotatedMethod) {
AnnotatedMethod meh = (AnnotatedMethod) m;
if (meh.getParameterCount() > 0) {
// note: get raw type FROM full type since only that resolves
// generic types
return meh.getParameterType(0).getRawClass();
}
}
// same as above, must get fully resolved type to handled generic typing
// of fields etc.
return m.getType().getRawClass();
}
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Helper classes
/**********************************************************
*/
private interface WithMember {
public T withMember(AnnotatedMember member);
}
/**
* @since 2.5
*/
protected static class MemberIterator
implements Iterator
{
private Linked next;
public MemberIterator(Linked first) {
next = first;
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return (next != null);
}
@Override
public T next() {
if (next == null) throw new NoSuchElementException();
T result = next.value;
next = next.next;
return result;
}
@Override
public void remove() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
}
/**
* Node used for creating simple linked lists to efficiently store small sets
* of things.
*/
protected final static class Linked
{
public final T value;
public final Linked next;
public final PropertyName name;
public final boolean isNameExplicit;
public final boolean isVisible;
public final boolean isMarkedIgnored;
public Linked(T v, Linked n,
PropertyName name, boolean explName, boolean visible, boolean ignored)
{
value = v;
next = n;
// ensure that we'll never have missing names
this.name = (name == null || name.isEmpty()) ? null : name;
if (explName) {
if (this.name == null) { // sanity check to catch internal problems
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot pass true for 'explName' if name is null/empty");
}
// 03-Apr-2014, tatu: But how about name-space only override?
// Probably should not be explicit? Or, need to merge somehow?
if (!name.hasSimpleName()) {
explName = false;
}
}
isNameExplicit = explName;
isVisible = visible;
isMarkedIgnored = ignored;
}
public Linked withoutNext() {
if (next == null) {
return this;
}
return new Linked(value, null, name, isNameExplicit, isVisible, isMarkedIgnored);
}
public Linked withValue(T newValue) {
if (newValue == value) {
return this;
}
return new Linked(newValue, next, name, isNameExplicit, isVisible, isMarkedIgnored);
}
public Linked withNext(Linked newNext) {
if (newNext == next) {
return this;
}
return new Linked(value, newNext, name, isNameExplicit, isVisible, isMarkedIgnored);
}
public Linked withoutIgnored() {
if (isMarkedIgnored) {
return (next == null) ? null : next.withoutIgnored();
}
if (next != null) {
Linked newNext = next.withoutIgnored();
if (newNext != next) {
return withNext(newNext);
}
}
return this;
}
public Linked withoutNonVisible() {
Linked newNext = (next == null) ? null : next.withoutNonVisible();
return isVisible ? withNext(newNext) : newNext;
}
/**
* Method called to append given node(s) at the end of this
* node chain.
*/
protected Linked append(Linked appendable) {
if (next == null) {
return withNext(appendable);
}
return withNext(next.append(appendable));
}
public Linked trimByVisibility() {
if (next == null) {
return this;
}
Linked newNext = next.trimByVisibility();
if (name != null) { // this already has highest; how about next one?
if (newNext.name == null) { // next one not, drop it
return withNext(null);
}
// both have it, keep
return withNext(newNext);
}
if (newNext.name != null) { // next one has higher, return it...
return newNext;
}
// neither has explicit name; how about visibility?
if (isVisible == newNext.isVisible) { // same; keep both in current order
return withNext(newNext);
}
return isVisible ? withNext(null) : newNext;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
String msg = String.format("%s[visible=%b,ignore=%b,explicitName=%b]",
value.toString(), isVisible, isMarkedIgnored, isNameExplicit);
if (next != null) {
msg = msg + ", "+next.toString();
}
return msg;
}
}
}