All Downloads are FREE. Search and download functionalities are using the official Maven repository.

com.google.common.collect.Ordering Maven / Gradle / Ivy

/*
 * Copyright (C) 2007 The Guava Authors
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import static com.google.common.collect.CollectPreconditions.checkNonnegative;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
import com.google.common.base.Function;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import java.util.SortedMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A comparator, with additional methods to support common operations. This is an "enriched" version
 * of {@code Comparator} for pre-Java-8 users, in the same sense that {@link FluentIterable} is an
 * enriched {@link Iterable} for pre-Java-8 users.
 *
 * 

Three types of methods

* * Like other fluent types, there are three types of methods present: methods for acquiring, * chaining, and using. * *

Acquiring

* *

The common ways to get an instance of {@code Ordering} are: * *

    *
  • Subclass it and implement {@link #compare} instead of implementing {@link Comparator} * directly *
  • Pass a pre-existing {@link Comparator} instance to {@link #from(Comparator)} *
  • Use the natural ordering, {@link Ordering#natural} *
* *

Chaining

* *

Then you can use the chaining methods to get an altered version of that {@code * Ordering}, including: * *

    *
  • {@link #reverse} *
  • {@link #compound(Comparator)} *
  • {@link #onResultOf(Function)} *
  • {@link #nullsFirst} / {@link #nullsLast} *
* *

Using

* *

Finally, use the resulting {@code Ordering} anywhere a {@link Comparator} is required, or use * any of its special operations, such as: * *

    *
  • {@link #immutableSortedCopy} *
  • {@link #isOrdered} / {@link #isStrictlyOrdered} *
  • {@link #min} / {@link #max} *
* *

Understanding complex orderings

* *

Complex chained orderings like the following example can be challenging to understand. * *

{@code
 * Ordering ordering =
 *     Ordering.natural()
 *         .nullsFirst()
 *         .onResultOf(getBarFunction)
 *         .nullsLast();
 * }
* * Note that each chaining method returns a new ordering instance which is backed by the previous * instance, but has the chance to act on values before handing off to that backing instance. * As a result, it usually helps to read chained ordering expressions backwards. For example, * when {@code compare} is called on the above ordering: * *
    *
  1. First, if only one {@code Foo} is null, that null value is treated as greater *
  2. Next, non-null {@code Foo} values are passed to {@code getBarFunction} (we will be * comparing {@code Bar} values from now on) *
  3. Next, if only one {@code Bar} is null, that null value is treated as lesser *
  4. Finally, natural ordering is used (i.e. the result of {@code Bar.compareTo(Bar)} is * returned) *
* *

Alas, {@link #reverse} is a little different. As you read backwards through a chain and * encounter a call to {@code reverse}, continue working backwards until a result is determined, and * then reverse that result. * *

Additional notes

* *

Except as noted, the orderings returned by the factory methods of this class are serializable * if and only if the provided instances that back them are. For example, if {@code ordering} and * {@code function} can themselves be serialized, then {@code ordering.onResultOf(function)} can as * well. * *

For Java 8 users

* *

If you are using Java 8, this class is now obsolete. Most of its functionality is now provided * by {@link java.util.stream.Stream Stream} and by {@link Comparator} itself, and the rest can now * be found as static methods in our new {@link Comparators} class. See each method below for * further instructions. Whenever possible, you should change any references of type {@code * Ordering} to be of type {@code Comparator} instead. However, at this time we have no plan to * deprecate this class. * *

Many replacements involve adopting {@code Stream}, and these changes can sometimes make your * code verbose. Whenever following this advice, you should check whether {@code Stream} could be * adopted more comprehensively in your code; the end result may be quite a bit simpler. * *

See also

* *

See the Guava User Guide article on {@code Ordering}. * * @author Jesse Wilson * @author Kevin Bourrillion * @since 2.0 */ @GwtCompatible public abstract class Ordering implements Comparator { // Natural order /** * Returns a serializable ordering that uses the natural order of the values. The ordering throws * a {@link NullPointerException} when passed a null parameter. * *

The type specification is {@code }, instead of the technically correct * {@code >}, to support legacy types from before Java 5. * *

Java 8 users: use {@link Comparator#naturalOrder} instead. */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // TODO(kevinb): right way to explain this?? public static Ordering natural() { return (Ordering) NaturalOrdering.INSTANCE; } // Static factories /** * Returns an ordering based on an existing comparator instance. Note that it is * unnecessary to create a new anonymous inner class implementing {@code Comparator} just * to pass it in here. Instead, simply subclass {@code Ordering} and implement its {@code compare} * method directly. * *

Java 8 users: this class is now obsolete as explained in the class documentation, so * there is no need to use this method. * * @param comparator the comparator that defines the order * @return comparator itself if it is already an {@code Ordering}; otherwise an ordering that * wraps that comparator */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public static Ordering from(Comparator comparator) { return (comparator instanceof Ordering) ? (Ordering) comparator : new ComparatorOrdering(comparator); } /** * Simply returns its argument. * * @deprecated no need to use this */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) @Deprecated public static Ordering from(Ordering ordering) { return checkNotNull(ordering); } /** * Returns an ordering that compares objects according to the order in which they appear in the * given list. Only objects present in the list (according to {@link Object#equals}) may be * compared. This comparator imposes a "partial ordering" over the type {@code T}. Subsequent * changes to the {@code valuesInOrder} list will have no effect on the returned comparator. Null * values in the list are not supported. * *

The returned comparator throws a {@link ClassCastException} when it receives an input * parameter that isn't among the provided values. * *

The generated comparator is serializable if all the provided values are serializable. * * @param valuesInOrder the values that the returned comparator will be able to compare, in the * order the comparator should induce * @return the comparator described above * @throws NullPointerException if any of the provided values is null * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code valuesInOrder} contains any duplicate values * (according to {@link Object#equals}) */ // TODO(kevinb): provide replacement @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public static Ordering explicit(List valuesInOrder) { return new ExplicitOrdering(valuesInOrder); } /** * Returns an ordering that compares objects according to the order in which they are given to * this method. Only objects present in the argument list (according to {@link Object#equals}) may * be compared. This comparator imposes a "partial ordering" over the type {@code T}. Null values * in the argument list are not supported. * *

The returned comparator throws a {@link ClassCastException} when it receives an input * parameter that isn't among the provided values. * *

The generated comparator is serializable if all the provided values are serializable. * * @param leastValue the value which the returned comparator should consider the "least" of all * values * @param remainingValuesInOrder the rest of the values that the returned comparator will be able * to compare, in the order the comparator should follow * @return the comparator described above * @throws NullPointerException if any of the provided values is null * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any duplicate values (according to {@link * Object#equals(Object)}) are present among the method arguments */ // TODO(kevinb): provide replacement @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public static Ordering explicit(T leastValue, T... remainingValuesInOrder) { return explicit(Lists.asList(leastValue, remainingValuesInOrder)); } // Ordering singletons /** * Returns an ordering which treats all values as equal, indicating "no ordering." Passing this * ordering to any stable sort algorithm results in no change to the order of elements. * Note especially that {@link #sortedCopy} and {@link #immutableSortedCopy} are stable, and in * the returned instance these are implemented by simply copying the source list. * *

Example: * *

{@code
   * Ordering.allEqual().nullsLast().sortedCopy(
   *     asList(t, null, e, s, null, t, null))
   * }
* *

Assuming {@code t}, {@code e} and {@code s} are non-null, this returns {@code [t, e, s, t, * null, null, null]} regardless of the true comparison order of those three values (which might * not even implement {@link Comparable} at all). * *

Warning: by definition, this comparator is not consistent with equals (as * defined {@linkplain Comparator here}). Avoid its use in APIs, such as {@link * TreeSet#TreeSet(Comparator)}, where such consistency is expected. * *

The returned comparator is serializable. * *

Java 8 users: Use the lambda expression {@code (a, b) -> 0} instead (in certain cases * you may need to cast that to {@code Comparator}). * * @since 13.0 */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public static Ordering allEqual() { return AllEqualOrdering.INSTANCE; } /** * Returns an ordering that compares objects by the natural ordering of their string * representations as returned by {@code toString()}. It does not support null values. * *

The comparator is serializable. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Comparator.comparing(Object::toString)} instead. */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public static Ordering usingToString() { return UsingToStringOrdering.INSTANCE; } /** * Returns an arbitrary ordering over all objects, for which {@code compare(a, b) == 0} implies * {@code a == b} (identity equality). There is no meaning whatsoever to the order imposed, but it * is constant for the life of the VM. * *

Because the ordering is identity-based, it is not "consistent with {@link * Object#equals(Object)}" as defined by {@link Comparator}. Use caution when building a {@link * SortedSet} or {@link SortedMap} from it, as the resulting collection will not behave exactly * according to spec. * *

This ordering is not serializable, as its implementation relies on {@link * System#identityHashCode(Object)}, so its behavior cannot be preserved across serialization. * * @since 2.0 */ // TODO(kevinb): copy to Comparators, etc. public static Ordering arbitrary() { return ArbitraryOrderingHolder.ARBITRARY_ORDERING; } private static class ArbitraryOrderingHolder { static final Ordering ARBITRARY_ORDERING = new ArbitraryOrdering(); } @VisibleForTesting static class ArbitraryOrdering extends Ordering { private final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0); private final ConcurrentMap uids = Platform.tryWeakKeys(new MapMaker()).makeMap(); private Integer getUid(Object obj) { Integer uid = uids.get(obj); if (uid == null) { // One or more integer values could be skipped in the event of a race // to generate a UID for the same object from multiple threads, but // that shouldn't be a problem. uid = counter.getAndIncrement(); Integer alreadySet = uids.putIfAbsent(obj, uid); if (alreadySet != null) { uid = alreadySet; } } return uid; } @Override public int compare(Object left, Object right) { if (left == right) { return 0; } else if (left == null) { return -1; } else if (right == null) { return 1; } int leftCode = identityHashCode(left); int rightCode = identityHashCode(right); if (leftCode != rightCode) { return leftCode < rightCode ? -1 : 1; } // identityHashCode collision (rare, but not as rare as you'd think) int result = getUid(left).compareTo(getUid(right)); if (result == 0) { throw new AssertionError(); // extremely, extremely unlikely. } return result; } @Override public String toString() { return "Ordering.arbitrary()"; } /* * We need to be able to mock identityHashCode() calls for tests, because it * can take 1-10 seconds to find colliding objects. Mocking frameworks that * can do magic to mock static method calls still can't do so for a system * class, so we need the indirection. In production, Hotspot should still * recognize that the call is 1-morphic and should still be willing to * inline it if necessary. */ int identityHashCode(Object object) { return System.identityHashCode(object); } } // Constructor /** * Constructs a new instance of this class (only invokable by the subclass constructor, typically * implicit). */ protected Ordering() {} // Instance-based factories (and any static equivalents) /** * Returns the reverse of this ordering; the {@code Ordering} equivalent to {@link * Collections#reverseOrder(Comparator)}. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code thisComparator.reversed()} instead. */ // type parameter lets us avoid the extra in statements like: // Ordering o = Ordering.natural().reverse(); @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public Ordering reverse() { return new ReverseOrdering(this); } /** * Returns an ordering that treats {@code null} as less than all other values and uses {@code * this} to compare non-null values. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Comparator.nullsFirst(thisComparator)} instead. */ // type parameter lets us avoid the extra in statements like: // Ordering o = Ordering.natural().nullsFirst(); @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public Ordering nullsFirst() { return new NullsFirstOrdering(this); } /** * Returns an ordering that treats {@code null} as greater than all other values and uses this * ordering to compare non-null values. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Comparator.nullsLast(thisComparator)} instead. */ // type parameter lets us avoid the extra in statements like: // Ordering o = Ordering.natural().nullsLast(); @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public Ordering nullsLast() { return new NullsLastOrdering(this); } /** * Returns a new ordering on {@code F} which orders elements by first applying a function to them, * then comparing those results using {@code this}. For example, to compare objects by their * string forms, in a case-insensitive manner, use: * *

{@code
   * Ordering.from(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER)
   *     .onResultOf(Functions.toStringFunction())
   * }
* *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Comparator.comparing(function, thisComparator)} instead (you * can omit the comparator if it is the natural order). */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public Ordering onResultOf(Function function) { return new ByFunctionOrdering<>(function, this); } Ordering> onKeys() { return onResultOf(Maps.keyFunction()); } /** * Returns an ordering which first uses the ordering {@code this}, but which in the event of a * "tie", then delegates to {@code secondaryComparator}. For example, to sort a bug list first by * status and second by priority, you might use {@code byStatus.compound(byPriority)}. For a * compound ordering with three or more components, simply chain multiple calls to this method. * *

An ordering produced by this method, or a chain of calls to this method, is equivalent to * one created using {@link Ordering#compound(Iterable)} on the same component comparators. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code thisComparator.thenComparing(secondaryComparator)} instead. * Depending on what {@code secondaryComparator} is, one of the other overloads of {@code * thenComparing} may be even more useful. */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public Ordering compound(Comparator secondaryComparator) { return new CompoundOrdering(this, checkNotNull(secondaryComparator)); } /** * Returns an ordering which tries each given comparator in order until a non-zero result is * found, returning that result, and returning zero only if all comparators return zero. The * returned ordering is based on the state of the {@code comparators} iterable at the time it was * provided to this method. * *

The returned ordering is equivalent to that produced using {@code * Ordering.from(comp1).compound(comp2).compound(comp3) . . .}. * *

Warning: Supplying an argument with undefined iteration order, such as a {@link * HashSet}, will produce non-deterministic results. * *

Java 8 users: Use a chain of calls to {@link Comparator#thenComparing(Comparator)}, * or {@code comparatorCollection.stream().reduce(Comparator::thenComparing).get()} (if the * collection might be empty, also provide a default comparator as the {@code identity} parameter * to {@code reduce}). * * @param comparators the comparators to try in order */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) public static Ordering compound(Iterable> comparators) { return new CompoundOrdering(comparators); } /** * Returns a new ordering which sorts iterables by comparing corresponding elements pairwise until * a nonzero result is found; imposes "dictionary order". If the end of one iterable is reached, * but not the other, the shorter iterable is considered to be less than the longer one. For * example, a lexicographical natural ordering over integers considers {@code [] < [1] < [1, 1] < * [1, 2] < [2]}. * *

Note that {@code ordering.lexicographical().reverse()} is not equivalent to {@code * ordering.reverse().lexicographical()} (consider how each would order {@code [1]} and {@code [1, * 1]}). * *

Java 8 users: Use {@link Comparators#lexicographical(Comparator)} instead. * * @since 2.0 */ @GwtCompatible(serializable = true) // type parameter lets us avoid the extra in statements like: // Ordering> o = // Ordering.natural().lexicographical(); public Ordering> lexicographical() { /* * Note that technically the returned ordering should be capable of * handling not just {@code Iterable} instances, but also any {@code * Iterable}. However, the need for this comes up so rarely * that it doesn't justify making everyone else deal with the very ugly * wildcard. */ return new LexicographicalOrdering(this); } // Regular instance methods // Override to add @Nullable @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(kak): Consider removing this @Override public abstract int compare(@Nullable T left, @Nullable T right); /** * Returns the least of the specified values according to this ordering. If there are multiple * least values, the first of those is returned. The iterator will be left exhausted: its {@code * hasNext()} method will return {@code false}. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Streams.stream(iterator).min(thisComparator).get()} instead * (but note that it does not guarantee which tied minimum element is returned). * * @param iterator the iterator whose minimum element is to be determined * @throws NoSuchElementException if {@code iterator} is empty * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. * @since 11.0 */ public E min(Iterator iterator) { // let this throw NoSuchElementException as necessary E minSoFar = iterator.next(); while (iterator.hasNext()) { minSoFar = min(minSoFar, iterator.next()); } return minSoFar; } /** * Returns the least of the specified values according to this ordering. If there are multiple * least values, the first of those is returned. * *

Java 8 users: If {@code iterable} is a {@link Collection}, use {@code * Collections.min(collection, thisComparator)} instead. Otherwise, use {@code * Streams.stream(iterable).min(thisComparator).get()} instead. Note that these alternatives do * not guarantee which tied minimum element is returned) * * @param iterable the iterable whose minimum element is to be determined * @throws NoSuchElementException if {@code iterable} is empty * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. */ public E min(Iterable iterable) { return min(iterable.iterator()); } /** * Returns the lesser of the two values according to this ordering. If the values compare as 0, * the first is returned. * *

Implementation note: this method is invoked by the default implementations of the * other {@code min} overloads, so overriding it will affect their behavior. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Collections.min(Arrays.asList(a, b), thisComparator)} * instead (but note that it does not guarantee which tied minimum element is returned). * * @param a value to compare, returned if less than or equal to b. * @param b value to compare. * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. */ public E min(@Nullable E a, @Nullable E b) { return (compare(a, b) <= 0) ? a : b; } /** * Returns the least of the specified values according to this ordering. If there are multiple * least values, the first of those is returned. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Collections.min(Arrays.asList(a, b, c...), thisComparator)} * instead (but note that it does not guarantee which tied minimum element is returned). * * @param a value to compare, returned if less than or equal to the rest. * @param b value to compare * @param c value to compare * @param rest values to compare * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. */ public E min(@Nullable E a, @Nullable E b, @Nullable E c, E... rest) { E minSoFar = min(min(a, b), c); for (E r : rest) { minSoFar = min(minSoFar, r); } return minSoFar; } /** * Returns the greatest of the specified values according to this ordering. If there are multiple * greatest values, the first of those is returned. The iterator will be left exhausted: its * {@code hasNext()} method will return {@code false}. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Streams.stream(iterator).max(thisComparator).get()} instead * (but note that it does not guarantee which tied maximum element is returned). * * @param iterator the iterator whose maximum element is to be determined * @throws NoSuchElementException if {@code iterator} is empty * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. * @since 11.0 */ public E max(Iterator iterator) { // let this throw NoSuchElementException as necessary E maxSoFar = iterator.next(); while (iterator.hasNext()) { maxSoFar = max(maxSoFar, iterator.next()); } return maxSoFar; } /** * Returns the greatest of the specified values according to this ordering. If there are multiple * greatest values, the first of those is returned. * *

Java 8 users: If {@code iterable} is a {@link Collection}, use {@code * Collections.max(collection, thisComparator)} instead. Otherwise, use {@code * Streams.stream(iterable).max(thisComparator).get()} instead. Note that these alternatives do * not guarantee which tied maximum element is returned) * * @param iterable the iterable whose maximum element is to be determined * @throws NoSuchElementException if {@code iterable} is empty * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. */ public E max(Iterable iterable) { return max(iterable.iterator()); } /** * Returns the greater of the two values according to this ordering. If the values compare as 0, * the first is returned. * *

Implementation note: this method is invoked by the default implementations of the * other {@code max} overloads, so overriding it will affect their behavior. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Collections.max(Arrays.asList(a, b), thisComparator)} * instead (but note that it does not guarantee which tied maximum element is returned). * * @param a value to compare, returned if greater than or equal to b. * @param b value to compare. * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. */ public E max(@Nullable E a, @Nullable E b) { return (compare(a, b) >= 0) ? a : b; } /** * Returns the greatest of the specified values according to this ordering. If there are multiple * greatest values, the first of those is returned. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Collections.max(Arrays.asList(a, b, c...), thisComparator)} * instead (but note that it does not guarantee which tied maximum element is returned). * * @param a value to compare, returned if greater than or equal to the rest. * @param b value to compare * @param c value to compare * @param rest values to compare * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not mutually comparable under this * ordering. */ public E max(@Nullable E a, @Nullable E b, @Nullable E c, E... rest) { E maxSoFar = max(max(a, b), c); for (E r : rest) { maxSoFar = max(maxSoFar, r); } return maxSoFar; } /** * Returns the {@code k} least elements of the given iterable according to this ordering, in order * from least to greatest. If there are fewer than {@code k} elements present, all will be * included. * *

The implementation does not necessarily use a stable sorting algorithm; when multiple * elements are equivalent, it is undefined which will come first. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Streams.stream(iterable).collect(Comparators.least(k, * thisComparator))} instead. * * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} least elements in ascending * order * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative * @since 8.0 */ public List leastOf(Iterable iterable, int k) { if (iterable instanceof Collection) { Collection collection = (Collection) iterable; if (collection.size() <= 2L * k) { // In this case, just dumping the collection to an array and sorting is // faster than using the implementation for Iterator, which is // specialized for k much smaller than n. @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // c only contains E's and doesn't escape E[] array = (E[]) collection.toArray(); Arrays.sort(array, this); if (array.length > k) { array = Arrays.copyOf(array, k); } return Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(array)); } } return leastOf(iterable.iterator(), k); } /** * Returns the {@code k} least elements from the given iterator according to this ordering, in * order from least to greatest. If there are fewer than {@code k} elements present, all will be * included. * *

The implementation does not necessarily use a stable sorting algorithm; when multiple * elements are equivalent, it is undefined which will come first. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Streams.stream(iterator).collect(Comparators.least(k, * thisComparator))} instead. * * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} least elements in ascending * order * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative * @since 14.0 */ public List leastOf(Iterator iterator, int k) { checkNotNull(iterator); checkNonnegative(k, "k"); if (k == 0 || !iterator.hasNext()) { return Collections.emptyList(); } else if (k >= Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2) { // k is really large; just do a straightforward sorted-copy-and-sublist ArrayList list = Lists.newArrayList(iterator); Collections.sort(list, this); if (list.size() > k) { list.subList(k, list.size()).clear(); } list.trimToSize(); return Collections.unmodifiableList(list); } else { TopKSelector selector = TopKSelector.least(k, this); selector.offerAll(iterator); return selector.topK(); } } /** * Returns the {@code k} greatest elements of the given iterable according to this ordering, in * order from greatest to least. If there are fewer than {@code k} elements present, all will be * included. * *

The implementation does not necessarily use a stable sorting algorithm; when multiple * elements are equivalent, it is undefined which will come first. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Streams.stream(iterable).collect(Comparators.greatest(k, * thisComparator))} instead. * * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} greatest elements in * descending order * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative * @since 8.0 */ public List greatestOf(Iterable iterable, int k) { // TODO(kevinb): see if delegation is hurting performance noticeably // TODO(kevinb): if we change this implementation, add full unit tests. return reverse().leastOf(iterable, k); } /** * Returns the {@code k} greatest elements from the given iterator according to this ordering, in * order from greatest to least. If there are fewer than {@code k} elements present, all will be * included. * *

The implementation does not necessarily use a stable sorting algorithm; when multiple * elements are equivalent, it is undefined which will come first. * *

Java 8 users: Use {@code Streams.stream(iterator).collect(Comparators.greatest(k, * thisComparator))} instead. * * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} greatest elements in * descending order * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative * @since 14.0 */ public List greatestOf(Iterator iterator, int k) { return reverse().leastOf(iterator, k); } /** * Returns a mutable list containing {@code elements} sorted by this ordering; use this * only when the resulting list may need further modification, or may contain {@code null}. The * input is not modified. The returned list is serializable and has random access. * *

Unlike {@link Sets#newTreeSet(Iterable)}, this method does not discard elements that are * duplicates according to the comparator. The sort performed is stable, meaning that such * elements will appear in the returned list in the same order they appeared in {@code elements}. * *

Performance note: According to our * benchmarking * on Open JDK 7, {@link #immutableSortedCopy} generally performs better (in both time and space) * than this method, and this method in turn generally performs better than copying the list and * calling {@link Collections#sort(List)}. */ // TODO(kevinb): rerun benchmarks including new options public List sortedCopy(Iterable elements) { @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // does not escape, and contains only E's E[] array = (E[]) Iterables.toArray(elements); Arrays.sort(array, this); return Lists.newArrayList(Arrays.asList(array)); } /** * Returns an immutable list containing {@code elements} sorted by this ordering. The input * is not modified. * *

Unlike {@link Sets#newTreeSet(Iterable)}, this method does not discard elements that are * duplicates according to the comparator. The sort performed is stable, meaning that such * elements will appear in the returned list in the same order they appeared in {@code elements}. * *

Performance note: According to our * benchmarking * on Open JDK 7, this method is the most efficient way to make a sorted copy of a collection. * * @throws NullPointerException if any element of {@code elements} is {@code null} * @since 3.0 */ // TODO(kevinb): rerun benchmarks including new options public ImmutableList immutableSortedCopy(Iterable elements) { return ImmutableList.sortedCopyOf(this, elements); } /** * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is greater than or * equal to the element that preceded it, according to this ordering. Note that this is always * true when the iterable has fewer than two elements. * *

Java 8 users: Use the equivalent {@link Comparators#isInOrder(Iterable, Comparator)} * instead, since the rest of {@code Ordering} is mostly obsolete (as explained in the class * documentation). */ public boolean isOrdered(Iterable iterable) { Iterator it = iterable.iterator(); if (it.hasNext()) { T prev = it.next(); while (it.hasNext()) { T next = it.next(); if (compare(prev, next) > 0) { return false; } prev = next; } } return true; } /** * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is strictly * greater than the element that preceded it, according to this ordering. Note that this is always * true when the iterable has fewer than two elements. * *

Java 8 users: Use the equivalent {@link Comparators#isInStrictOrder(Iterable, * Comparator)} instead, since the rest of {@code Ordering} is mostly obsolete (as explained in * the class documentation). */ public boolean isStrictlyOrdered(Iterable iterable) { Iterator it = iterable.iterator(); if (it.hasNext()) { T prev = it.next(); while (it.hasNext()) { T next = it.next(); if (compare(prev, next) >= 0) { return false; } prev = next; } } return true; } /** * {@link Collections#binarySearch(List, Object, Comparator) Searches} {@code sortedList} for * {@code key} using the binary search algorithm. The list must be sorted using this ordering. * * @param sortedList the list to be searched * @param key the key to be searched for * @deprecated Use {@link Collections#binarySearch(List, Object, Comparator)} directly. */ @Deprecated public int binarySearch(List sortedList, @Nullable T key) { return Collections.binarySearch(sortedList, key, this); } /** * Exception thrown by a {@link Ordering#explicit(List)} or {@link Ordering#explicit(Object, * Object[])} comparator when comparing a value outside the set of values it can compare. * Extending {@link ClassCastException} may seem odd, but it is required. */ @VisibleForTesting static class IncomparableValueException extends ClassCastException { final Object value; IncomparableValueException(Object value) { super("Cannot compare value: " + value); this.value = value; } private static final long serialVersionUID = 0; } // Never make these public static final int LEFT_IS_GREATER = 1; static final int RIGHT_IS_GREATER = -1; }