All Downloads are FREE. Search and download functionalities are using the official Maven repository.
  • Log In
  • Register

    • com.gravity.goose.statichtml.issue_32.txt Maven / Gradle / Ivy

    Go to download

    Goose was originally an article extractor written in Java that has most recently (aug2011) converted to a scala project. It's mission is to take any news article or article type web page and not only extract what is the main body of the article but also all meta data and most probable image candidate.

    The newest version!
    




	Plan to restrict public-records data draws mounting opposition | Tulsa World


        

            
            
            

            

        
        
        
        



    


















































    

    





    














    

	
	
	

    
    



    








    
    








    



    
    
    
        
            READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION
        
        




                    
                        SUBSCRIBE | 

	                    CONTACT US | 
                        SIGN IN
                    




        
    
    

    

















        
    




            







     

    
    














    

    
	
    

		Print

        Email
        Twitter
        Facebook
        
    
    

    

    


    





    


    


    
	
    Plan to restrict public-records data draws mounting opposition
    

    
    










	
    
    By World's Editorial Writers

    
    
    Published:  11/18/2011  2:27 AM

	
    

    Last Modified:  11/18/2011  4:06 AM
    

	
    
	

	
		
    
	
    Opposition to a proposal to remove certain personal data from court records is mounting and with good reason. Or good reasons, we should say.
    



    

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has proposed what's known as Rule 31, which would lead to the removal of such information as dates of birth and addresses from court records. The court has sought public comment on the proposal, and it sure got an earful.


    

We in the news business have long opposed the move because it would make it more difficult for reporters and editors to verify identities and uncover background information on people in the news.


    

But now, members of law enforcement, district attorneys' offices and the business community have come out against the proposal, for varying reasons.


    

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt wrote the court, saying his office is concerned "about our ability as a law enforcement agency to correctly identify a suspect prior to arrest or a defendant in the courtroom or a proper prior conviction with only partial data available."


    

The staff in the District 12 district attorneys office, which represents Rogers, Craig and Mayes counties, also spoke up.


    

District 12 District Attorney Janice Steidley called the proposed rules "an injustice to criminal prosecution."


    

Assistant District Attorney Donald Palik said that redacting personal information from criminal records would make it difficult or impossible for prosecutors to prove to a jury that a person who was convicted of a prior offense is the same person who is on trial.


    

The Oklahoma Sheriffs' Association Board of Directors also opposes the proposal, arguing in its letter that the information now available assures law officers "they are locating, arresting and detaining the proper person."


    

The Greater Oklahoma City Chamber wrote that the proposed rule "would be detrimental to the numerous businesses which both provide as a product and utilize during the hiring process detailed court records to prevent the employment of convicted felons."


    

Other responses noted that identity theft arising from personal information in court records has not proven to be a big problem.


    

And, another complaint was that restricting such personal information would lead to higher fees for people needing to conduct investigations. An official with a background screening company said the rule could even result in more discrimination against minorities if employers cannot obtain the information they need on an applicant's background.


    

Does the court need any more reasons to jettison this proposed rule? We think not.

     
        
    
    

    Original Print Headline: More reasons

    

	

    
    Copyright 2011 World Publishing Co. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
    

  
    

    








		

    
		















    
	
    
		
            Reader Comments
        
		
            3 Total

        
	
    

    



    










    







        
        



        
    
	
    
		

					


					
					
				
		
					


					
    
						Simply ghastly.  I side with the World's Editors on this one.  

    Look, if there's a problem with identity theft, then divert some of the trillions of dollars wasted on the war on drugs and fund a branch of the FBI that would concern itself with identity theft crimes.  Deal with the bad guys; don't invite a looming data catastrophe.  

    Whose flippin' idea was this anyway?
					
    

				    		
	
    

    


        
    
	
    
		

					


					
					

				
		
					
    

						


						Eagle 4





						(1 day ago)
					
    


					
    

						I think the proposal started at the Big House in McAlester and found favor among the elite, incognito crowd. If I have to guess one person, it would be Gene Stipe. The real purpose is likely to make it harder to follow the money and the crooks, both legal and illegal.
					
    
				    		
	
    

    


        
    
	
    
		

					


					

					
				
		
					



					
    
						The Oklahoma Supreme Court came up with this idea?? Are they trying to make things harder for the legal system?? If it is identity theft they are concerned with, I have one question: Who would want to steal the identity of a possible child molester or rapist??? I think we owe it to the law abiding citizens of Oklahoma to make sure the right person is "identified" in any legal matter. I lived in a neighborhood once where one house had "child molester", "sex offender", and "pervert" spray painted on his garage door, and guess what?? WRONG PERSON!
					
    
				    		
	
    

    



		
    

		
    





    
	3 comments displayed





    



    



    


    

	



	


	
    
		
    In order to post a comment on this page, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com.  If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.
    
	
    







	








	


	


	


	


	








	





	
    
		
	
    



	
    

	
    


	

    


    
    



    
    

		

		
    

		

        


    
    

    

    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    

    

    

        
    

		
    

    


    











		
		
    






    
   Most Popular Stories


    

    
    
    
	
    
		
                
    
                    Most Viewed
                
    
                		
		
                
    

                    Most Commented
                
    
                		
	
    

    


    


    

    

    
    
    
        

        
        
    

        
    
            		
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
        


        View the Top 50
        
    
    
     
    
        
            These are the most viewed stories in the last 24 hours.

        
    
    


    


    
		
    
		
    

		
		
    

    
    








    


    


    

    

Home |
Contact Us |
Search |
Subscribe |
Customer Service |

About |
Advertise  |
Privacy

    
Copyright © 2011, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




    © 2015 - 2025 Weber Informatics LLC | Privacy Policy