org.jetbrains.kotlin.backend.jvm.lower.AddSuperQualifierToJavaFieldAccessLowering.kt Maven / Gradle / Ivy

Go to download
Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of kotlin-compiler-embeddable Show documentation
the Kotlin compiler embeddable
There is a newer version: 2.1.0-RC
Show newest version
/*
 * Copyright 2010-2023 JetBrains s.r.o. and Kotlin Programming Language contributors.
 * Use of this source code is governed by the Apache 2.0 license that can be found in the license/LICENSE.txt file.
 */

package org.jetbrains.kotlin.backend.jvm.lower

import org.jetbrains.kotlin.backend.common.FileLoweringPass
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.backend.common.phaser.makeIrFilePhase
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.backend.jvm.ir.erasedUpperBound
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.IrElement
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.declarations.IrClass
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.declarations.IrField
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.declarations.IrFile
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.expressions.IrExpression
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.expressions.IrFieldAccessExpression
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.types.getClass
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.util.isClass
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.util.isEnumClass
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.util.isFromJava
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.util.parentClassOrNull
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.visitors.IrElementVisitorVoid

internal val addSuperQualifierToJavaFieldAccessPhase = makeIrFilePhase(
    { context ->
        if (context.config.useFir) AddSuperQualifierToJavaFieldAccessLowering
        else FileLoweringPass.Empty
    },
    name = "AddSuperQualifierToJavaFieldAccess",
    description = "Make `\$delegate` methods for optimized delegated properties static",
    // Property references need to be lowered to classes with field access inside. We can't perform this phase on unlowered property
    // references as IrPropertyReference doesn't have superQualifierSymbol.
    prerequisite = setOf(propertyReferencePhase),
)

// This lowering changes field accesses so that codegen will correctly generate access to a public field in a Java superclass of a Kotlin
// class, even if that field is "shadowed" by a property in the Kotlin class, with a _private_ field with the same name.
// See KT-49507 and KT-48954 as good examples for cases we try to handle here.
private object AddSuperQualifierToJavaFieldAccessLowering : IrElementVisitorVoid, FileLoweringPass {
    override fun lower(irFile: IrFile) {
        irFile.accept(this, null)
    }

    override fun visitElement(element: IrElement) {
        element.acceptChildren(this, null)
    }

    override fun visitFieldAccess(expression: IrFieldAccessExpression) {
        val dispatchReceiver = expression.receiver
        if (dispatchReceiver != null) {
            expression.superQualifierSymbol = superQualifierSymbolForField(dispatchReceiver, expression.symbol.owner)?.symbol
        }
        super.visitFieldAccess(expression)
    }

    // Note that we're abusing superQualifierSymbol to make codegen generate the correct field owner in the bytecode.
    // However, currently there seems to be no better way to support it.
    private fun superQualifierSymbolForField(dispatchReceiver: IrExpression, field: IrField): IrClass? {
        if (field.correspondingPropertySymbol != null) return null
        val originalContainingClass = field.parentClassOrNull ?: return null
        val dispatchReceiverRepresentativeClass = dispatchReceiver.type.erasedUpperBound
        // Find first Java super class to avoid possible visibility exposure & separate compilation problems
        return getJavaFieldContainingClassSymbol(dispatchReceiverRepresentativeClass, originalContainingClass)
    }

    // Note: dispatchReceiverRepresentativeClassifierSymbol here is the use-site receiver class,
    // and originalContainingClass is the class which contains Java field we are trying to access
    // ! Interfaces are out of our interests here !
    // This function returns a class symbol which:
    // - is the most derived Java class in hierarchy which has no Kotlin base classes (including transitive ones)
    // E.g. K2 <: J3 <: K1 <: J2 <: J1 ==> J2 is chosen
    // We shouldn't allow base Kotlin classes to avoid possible clashes with invisible properties inside
    private fun getJavaFieldContainingClassSymbol(dispatchReceiverRepresentativeClass: IrClass, originalContainingClass: IrClass): IrClass =
        findMostSpecificJavaClassWithoutKotlinSuperclasses(
            dispatchReceiverRepresentativeClass, originalContainingClass
        )?.resultingClass ?: originalContainingClass

    private fun findMostSpecificJavaClassWithoutKotlinSuperclasses(current: IrClass, top: IrClass): SearchResult? {
        if (current == top) return SearchResult(top, false)

        val superClass = current.superTypes.firstNotNullOfOrNull { supertype ->
            supertype.getClass()?.takeIf { it.isClass || it.isEnumClass }
        } ?: return null

        val result = findMostSpecificJavaClassWithoutKotlinSuperclasses(superClass, top) ?: return null
        return if (current.isFromJava()) {
            if (result.hasKotlinSuperclasses) result else SearchResult(current, false)
        } else {
            SearchResult(result.resultingClass, true)
        }
    }

    private class SearchResult(val resultingClass: IrClass, val hasKotlinSuperclasses: Boolean)
}