node_modules.graphql.validation.rules.OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged.js Maven / Gradle / Ivy
Go to download
Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of apollo-client-maven-plugin Show documentation
Show all versions of apollo-client-maven-plugin Show documentation
Maven plugin for generating graphql clients
The newest version!
'use strict';
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", {
value: true
});
exports.fieldsConflictMessage = fieldsConflictMessage;
exports.OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged = OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged;
var _error = require('../../error');
var _find = require('../../jsutils/find');
var _find2 = _interopRequireDefault(_find);
var _kinds = require('../../language/kinds');
var Kind = _interopRequireWildcard(_kinds);
var _printer = require('../../language/printer');
var _definition = require('../../type/definition');
var _typeFromAST = require('../../utilities/typeFromAST');
function _interopRequireWildcard(obj) { if (obj && obj.__esModule) { return obj; } else { var newObj = {}; if (obj != null) { for (var key in obj) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) newObj[key] = obj[key]; } } newObj.default = obj; return newObj; } }
function _interopRequireDefault(obj) { return obj && obj.__esModule ? obj : { default: obj }; }
function _classCallCheck(instance, Constructor) { if (!(instance instanceof Constructor)) { throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); } }
/**
* Copyright (c) 2015, Facebook, Inc.
* All rights reserved.
*
* This source code is licensed under the BSD-style license found in the
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
* of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.
*/
function fieldsConflictMessage(responseName, reason) {
return 'Fields "' + responseName + '" conflict because ' + reasonMessage(reason) + '. Use different aliases on the fields to fetch both if this was ' + 'intentional.';
}
function reasonMessage(reason) {
if (Array.isArray(reason)) {
return reason.map(function (_ref) {
var responseName = _ref[0],
subreason = _ref[1];
return 'subfields "' + responseName + '" conflict because ' + reasonMessage(subreason);
}).join(' and ');
}
return reason;
}
/**
* Overlapping fields can be merged
*
* A selection set is only valid if all fields (including spreading any
* fragments) either correspond to distinct response names or can be merged
* without ambiguity.
*/
function OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged(context) {
// A memoization for when two fragments are compared "between" each other for
// conflicts. Two fragments may be compared many times, so memoizing this can
// dramatically improve the performance of this validator.
var comparedFragments = new PairSet();
// A cache for the "field map" and list of fragment names found in any given
// selection set. Selection sets may be asked for this information multiple
// times, so this improves the performance of this validator.
var cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames = new Map();
return {
SelectionSet: function SelectionSet(selectionSet) {
var conflicts = findConflictsWithinSelectionSet(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, context.getParentType(), selectionSet);
conflicts.forEach(function (_ref2) {
var _ref2$ = _ref2[0],
responseName = _ref2$[0],
reason = _ref2$[1],
fields1 = _ref2[1],
fields2 = _ref2[2];
return context.reportError(new _error.GraphQLError(fieldsConflictMessage(responseName, reason), fields1.concat(fields2)));
});
}
};
}
// Field name and reason.
// Reason is a string, or a nested list of conflicts.
// Tuple defining a field node in a context.
// Map of array of those.
/**
* Algorithm:
*
* Conflicts occur when two fields exist in a query which will produce the same
* response name, but represent differing values, thus creating a conflict.
* The algorithm below finds all conflicts via making a series of comparisons
* between fields. In order to compare as few fields as possible, this makes
* a series of comparisons "within" sets of fields and "between" sets of fields.
*
* Given any selection set, a collection produces both a set of fields by
* also including all inline fragments, as well as a list of fragments
* referenced by fragment spreads.
*
* A) Each selection set represented in the document first compares "within" its
* collected set of fields, finding any conflicts between every pair of
* overlapping fields.
* Note: This is the *only time* that a the fields "within" a set are compared
* to each other. After this only fields "between" sets are compared.
*
* B) Also, if any fragment is referenced in a selection set, then a
* comparison is made "between" the original set of fields and the
* referenced fragment.
*
* C) Also, if multiple fragments are referenced, then comparisons
* are made "between" each referenced fragment.
*
* D) When comparing "between" a set of fields and a referenced fragment, first
* a comparison is made between each field in the original set of fields and
* each field in the the referenced set of fields.
*
* E) Also, if any fragment is referenced in the referenced selection set,
* then a comparison is made "between" the original set of fields and the
* referenced fragment (recursively referring to step D).
*
* F) When comparing "between" two fragments, first a comparison is made between
* each field in the first referenced set of fields and each field in the the
* second referenced set of fields.
*
* G) Also, any fragments referenced by the first must be compared to the
* second, and any fragments referenced by the second must be compared to the
* first (recursively referring to step F).
*
* H) When comparing two fields, if both have selection sets, then a comparison
* is made "between" both selection sets, first comparing the set of fields in
* the first selection set with the set of fields in the second.
*
* I) Also, if any fragment is referenced in either selection set, then a
* comparison is made "between" the other set of fields and the
* referenced fragment.
*
* J) Also, if two fragments are referenced in both selection sets, then a
* comparison is made "between" the two fragments.
*
*/
// Find all conflicts found "within" a selection set, including those found
// via spreading in fragments. Called when visiting each SelectionSet in the
// GraphQL Document.
function findConflictsWithinSelectionSet(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, parentType, selectionSet) {
var conflicts = [];
var _getFieldsAndFragment = getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType, selectionSet),
fieldMap = _getFieldsAndFragment[0],
fragmentNames = _getFieldsAndFragment[1];
// (A) Find find all conflicts "within" the fields of this selection set.
// Note: this is the *only place* `collectConflictsWithin` is called.
collectConflictsWithin(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, fieldMap);
// (B) Then collect conflicts between these fields and those represented by
// each spread fragment name found.
for (var i = 0; i < fragmentNames.length; i++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, false, fieldMap, fragmentNames[i]);
// (C) Then compare this fragment with all other fragments found in this
// selection set to collect conflicts between fragments spread together.
// This compares each item in the list of fragment names to every other item
// in that same list (except for itself).
for (var j = i + 1; j < fragmentNames.length; j++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, false, fragmentNames[i], fragmentNames[j]);
}
}
return conflicts;
}
// Collect all conflicts found between a set of fields and a fragment reference
// including via spreading in any nested fragments.
function collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap, fragmentName) {
var fragment = context.getFragment(fragmentName);
if (!fragment) {
return;
}
var _getReferencedFieldsA = getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment),
fieldMap2 = _getReferencedFieldsA[0],
fragmentNames2 = _getReferencedFieldsA[1];
// (D) First collect any conflicts between the provided collection of fields
// and the collection of fields represented by the given fragment.
collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap, fieldMap2);
// (E) Then collect any conflicts between the provided collection of fields
// and any fragment names found in the given fragment.
for (var i = 0; i < fragmentNames2.length; i++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap, fragmentNames2[i]);
}
}
// Collect all conflicts found between two fragments, including via spreading in
// any nested fragments.
function collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentName1, fragmentName2) {
var fragment1 = context.getFragment(fragmentName1);
var fragment2 = context.getFragment(fragmentName2);
if (!fragment1 || !fragment2) {
return;
}
// No need to compare a fragment to itself.
if (fragment1 === fragment2) {
return;
}
// Memoize so two fragments are not compared for conflicts more than once.
if (comparedFragments.has(fragmentName1, fragmentName2, areMutuallyExclusive)) {
return;
}
comparedFragments.add(fragmentName1, fragmentName2, areMutuallyExclusive);
var _getReferencedFieldsA2 = getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment1),
fieldMap1 = _getReferencedFieldsA2[0],
fragmentNames1 = _getReferencedFieldsA2[1];
var _getReferencedFieldsA3 = getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment2),
fieldMap2 = _getReferencedFieldsA3[0],
fragmentNames2 = _getReferencedFieldsA3[1];
// (F) First, collect all conflicts between these two collections of fields
// (not including any nested fragments).
collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fieldMap2);
// (G) Then collect conflicts between the first fragment and any nested
// fragments spread in the second fragment.
for (var j = 0; j < fragmentNames2.length; j++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentName1, fragmentNames2[j]);
}
// (G) Then collect conflicts between the second fragment and any nested
// fragments spread in the first fragment.
for (var i = 0; i < fragmentNames1.length; i++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentNames1[i], fragmentName2);
}
}
// Find all conflicts found between two selection sets, including those found
// via spreading in fragments. Called when determining if conflicts exist
// between the sub-fields of two overlapping fields.
function findConflictsBetweenSubSelectionSets(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, parentType1, selectionSet1, parentType2, selectionSet2) {
var conflicts = [];
var _getFieldsAndFragment2 = getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType1, selectionSet1),
fieldMap1 = _getFieldsAndFragment2[0],
fragmentNames1 = _getFieldsAndFragment2[1];
var _getFieldsAndFragment3 = getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType2, selectionSet2),
fieldMap2 = _getFieldsAndFragment3[0],
fragmentNames2 = _getFieldsAndFragment3[1];
// (H) First, collect all conflicts between these two collections of field.
collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fieldMap2);
// (I) Then collect conflicts between the first collection of fields and
// those referenced by each fragment name associated with the second.
for (var j = 0; j < fragmentNames2.length; j++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fragmentNames2[j]);
}
// (I) Then collect conflicts between the second collection of fields and
// those referenced by each fragment name associated with the first.
for (var i = 0; i < fragmentNames1.length; i++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap2, fragmentNames1[i]);
}
// (J) Also collect conflicts between any fragment names by the first and
// fragment names by the second. This compares each item in the first set of
// names to each item in the second set of names.
for (var _i = 0; _i < fragmentNames1.length; _i++) {
for (var _j = 0; _j < fragmentNames2.length; _j++) {
collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentNames1[_i], fragmentNames2[_j]);
}
}
return conflicts;
}
// Collect all Conflicts "within" one collection of fields.
function collectConflictsWithin(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, fieldMap) {
// A field map is a keyed collection, where each key represents a response
// name and the value at that key is a list of all fields which provide that
// response name. For every response name, if there are multiple fields, they
// must be compared to find a potential conflict.
Object.keys(fieldMap).forEach(function (responseName) {
var fields = fieldMap[responseName];
// This compares every field in the list to every other field in this list
// (except to itself). If the list only has one item, nothing needs to
// be compared.
if (fields.length > 1) {
for (var i = 0; i < fields.length; i++) {
for (var j = i + 1; j < fields.length; j++) {
var conflict = findConflict(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, false, // within one collection is never mutually exclusive
responseName, fields[i], fields[j]);
if (conflict) {
conflicts.push(conflict);
}
}
}
}
});
}
// Collect all Conflicts between two collections of fields. This is similar to,
// but different from the `collectConflictsWithin` function above. This check
// assumes that `collectConflictsWithin` has already been called on each
// provided collection of fields. This is true because this validator traverses
// each individual selection set.
function collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fieldMap2) {
// A field map is a keyed collection, where each key represents a response
// name and the value at that key is a list of all fields which provide that
// response name. For any response name which appears in both provided field
// maps, each field from the first field map must be compared to every field
// in the second field map to find potential conflicts.
Object.keys(fieldMap1).forEach(function (responseName) {
var fields2 = fieldMap2[responseName];
if (fields2) {
var fields1 = fieldMap1[responseName];
for (var i = 0; i < fields1.length; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < fields2.length; j++) {
var conflict = findConflict(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive, responseName, fields1[i], fields2[j]);
if (conflict) {
conflicts.push(conflict);
}
}
}
}
});
}
// Determines if there is a conflict between two particular fields, including
// comparing their sub-fields.
function findConflict(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive, responseName, field1, field2) {
var parentType1 = field1[0],
node1 = field1[1],
def1 = field1[2];
var parentType2 = field2[0],
node2 = field2[1],
def2 = field2[2];
// If it is known that two fields could not possibly apply at the same
// time, due to the parent types, then it is safe to permit them to diverge
// in aliased field or arguments used as they will not present any ambiguity
// by differing.
// It is known that two parent types could never overlap if they are
// different Object types. Interface or Union types might overlap - if not
// in the current state of the schema, then perhaps in some future version,
// thus may not safely diverge.
var areMutuallyExclusive = parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive || parentType1 !== parentType2 && parentType1 instanceof _definition.GraphQLObjectType && parentType2 instanceof _definition.GraphQLObjectType;
// The return type for each field.
var type1 = def1 && def1.type;
var type2 = def2 && def2.type;
if (!areMutuallyExclusive) {
// Two aliases must refer to the same field.
var name1 = node1.name.value;
var name2 = node2.name.value;
if (name1 !== name2) {
return [[responseName, name1 + ' and ' + name2 + ' are different fields'], [node1], [node2]];
}
// Two field calls must have the same arguments.
if (!sameArguments(node1.arguments || [], node2.arguments || [])) {
return [[responseName, 'they have differing arguments'], [node1], [node2]];
}
}
if (type1 && type2 && doTypesConflict(type1, type2)) {
return [[responseName, 'they return conflicting types ' + String(type1) + ' and ' + String(type2)], [node1], [node2]];
}
// Collect and compare sub-fields. Use the same "visited fragment names" list
// for both collections so fields in a fragment reference are never
// compared to themselves.
var selectionSet1 = node1.selectionSet;
var selectionSet2 = node2.selectionSet;
if (selectionSet1 && selectionSet2) {
var conflicts = findConflictsBetweenSubSelectionSets(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragments, areMutuallyExclusive, (0, _definition.getNamedType)(type1), selectionSet1, (0, _definition.getNamedType)(type2), selectionSet2);
return subfieldConflicts(conflicts, responseName, node1, node2);
}
}
function sameArguments(arguments1, arguments2) {
if (arguments1.length !== arguments2.length) {
return false;
}
return arguments1.every(function (argument1) {
var argument2 = (0, _find2.default)(arguments2, function (argument) {
return argument.name.value === argument1.name.value;
});
if (!argument2) {
return false;
}
return sameValue(argument1.value, argument2.value);
});
}
function sameValue(value1, value2) {
return !value1 && !value2 || (0, _printer.print)(value1) === (0, _printer.print)(value2);
}
// Two types conflict if both types could not apply to a value simultaneously.
// Composite types are ignored as their individual field types will be compared
// later recursively. However List and Non-Null types must match.
function doTypesConflict(type1, type2) {
if (type1 instanceof _definition.GraphQLList) {
return type2 instanceof _definition.GraphQLList ? doTypesConflict(type1.ofType, type2.ofType) : true;
}
if (type2 instanceof _definition.GraphQLList) {
return type1 instanceof _definition.GraphQLList ? doTypesConflict(type1.ofType, type2.ofType) : true;
}
if (type1 instanceof _definition.GraphQLNonNull) {
return type2 instanceof _definition.GraphQLNonNull ? doTypesConflict(type1.ofType, type2.ofType) : true;
}
if (type2 instanceof _definition.GraphQLNonNull) {
return type1 instanceof _definition.GraphQLNonNull ? doTypesConflict(type1.ofType, type2.ofType) : true;
}
if ((0, _definition.isLeafType)(type1) || (0, _definition.isLeafType)(type2)) {
return type1 !== type2;
}
return false;
}
// Given a selection set, return the collection of fields (a mapping of response
// name to field nodes and definitions) as well as a list of fragment names
// referenced via fragment spreads.
function getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType, selectionSet) {
var cached = cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames.get(selectionSet);
if (!cached) {
var nodeAndDefs = Object.create(null);
var fragmentNames = Object.create(null);
_collectFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, parentType, selectionSet, nodeAndDefs, fragmentNames);
cached = [nodeAndDefs, Object.keys(fragmentNames)];
cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames.set(selectionSet, cached);
}
return cached;
}
// Given a reference to a fragment, return the represented collection of fields
// as well as a list of nested fragment names referenced via fragment spreads.
function getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment) {
// Short-circuit building a type from the node if possible.
var cached = cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames.get(fragment.selectionSet);
if (cached) {
return cached;
}
var fragmentType = (0, _typeFromAST.typeFromAST)(context.getSchema(), fragment.typeCondition);
return getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragmentType, fragment.selectionSet);
}
function _collectFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, parentType, selectionSet, nodeAndDefs, fragmentNames) {
for (var i = 0; i < selectionSet.selections.length; i++) {
var selection = selectionSet.selections[i];
switch (selection.kind) {
case Kind.FIELD:
var fieldName = selection.name.value;
var fieldDef = void 0;
if (parentType instanceof _definition.GraphQLObjectType || parentType instanceof _definition.GraphQLInterfaceType) {
fieldDef = parentType.getFields()[fieldName];
}
var responseName = selection.alias ? selection.alias.value : fieldName;
if (!nodeAndDefs[responseName]) {
nodeAndDefs[responseName] = [];
}
nodeAndDefs[responseName].push([parentType, selection, fieldDef]);
break;
case Kind.FRAGMENT_SPREAD:
fragmentNames[selection.name.value] = true;
break;
case Kind.INLINE_FRAGMENT:
var typeCondition = selection.typeCondition;
var inlineFragmentType = typeCondition ? (0, _typeFromAST.typeFromAST)(context.getSchema(), typeCondition) : parentType;
_collectFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, inlineFragmentType, selection.selectionSet, nodeAndDefs, fragmentNames);
break;
}
}
}
// Given a series of Conflicts which occurred between two sub-fields, generate
// a single Conflict.
function subfieldConflicts(conflicts, responseName, node1, node2) {
if (conflicts.length > 0) {
return [[responseName, conflicts.map(function (_ref3) {
var reason = _ref3[0];
return reason;
})], conflicts.reduce(function (allFields, _ref4) {
var fields1 = _ref4[1];
return allFields.concat(fields1);
}, [node1]), conflicts.reduce(function (allFields, _ref5) {
var fields2 = _ref5[2];
return allFields.concat(fields2);
}, [node2])];
}
}
/**
* A way to keep track of pairs of things when the ordering of the pair does
* not matter. We do this by maintaining a sort of double adjacency sets.
*/
var PairSet = function () {
function PairSet() {
_classCallCheck(this, PairSet);
this._data = Object.create(null);
}
PairSet.prototype.has = function has(a, b, areMutuallyExclusive) {
var first = this._data[a];
var result = first && first[b];
if (result === undefined) {
return false;
}
// areMutuallyExclusive being false is a superset of being true,
// hence if we want to know if this PairSet "has" these two with no
// exclusivity, we have to ensure it was added as such.
if (areMutuallyExclusive === false) {
return result === false;
}
return true;
};
PairSet.prototype.add = function add(a, b, areMutuallyExclusive) {
_pairSetAdd(this._data, a, b, areMutuallyExclusive);
_pairSetAdd(this._data, b, a, areMutuallyExclusive);
};
return PairSet;
}();
function _pairSetAdd(data, a, b, areMutuallyExclusive) {
var map = data[a];
if (!map) {
map = Object.create(null);
data[a] = map;
}
map[b] = areMutuallyExclusive;
}