Download java8 JAR 4.1.43 with all dependencies
# pact-jvm-consumer-java8
Provides a Java8 lambda based DSL for use with Junit to build consumer tests.
## Dependency
The library is available on maven central using:
* group-id = `au.com.dius.pact.consumer`
* artifact-id = `java8`
* version-id = `4.1.x`
# A Lambda DSL for Pact
This is an extension for the pact DSL provided by [consumer](../consumer). The difference between
the default pact DSL and this lambda DSL is, as the name suggests, the usage of lambdas. The use of lambdas makes the code much cleaner.
## Why a new DSL implementation?
The lambda DSL solves the following two main issues. Both are visible in the following code sample:
```java
new PactDslJsonArray()
.array() # open an array
.stringValue("a1") # choose the method that is valid for arrays
.stringValue("a2") # choose the method that is valid for arrays
.closeArray() # close the array
.array() # open an array
.numberValue(1) # choose the method that is valid for arrays
.numberValue(2) # choose the method that is valid for arrays
.closeArray() # close the array
.array() # open an array
.object() # now we work with an object
.stringValue("foo", "Foo") # choose the method that is valid for objects
.closeObject() # close the object and we're back in the array
.closeArray() # close the array
```
### The existing DSL is quite error-prone
Methods may only be called in certain states. For example `object()` may only be called when you're currently working on an array whereas `object(name)`
is only allowed to be called when working on an object. But both of the methods are available. You'll find out at runtime if you're using the correct method.
Finally, the need for opening and closing objects and arrays makes usage cumbersome.
The lambda DSL has no ambiguous methods and there's no need to close objects and arrays as all the work on such an object is wrapped in a lamda call.
### The existing DSL is hard to read
When formatting your source code with an IDE the code becomes hard to read as there's no indentation possible. Of course, you could do it by hand but we want auto formatting!
Auto formatting works great for the new DSL!
```java
array.object((o) -> {
o.stringValue("foo", "Foo"); # an attribute
o.stringValue("bar", "Bar"); # an attribute
o.object("tar", (tarObject) -> { # an attribute with a nested object
tarObject.stringValue("a", "A"); # attribute of the nested object
tarObject.stringValue("b", "B"); # attribute of the nested object
})
});
```
## Installation
### Maven
```
<dependency>
<groupId>au.com.dius.pact.consumer</groupId>
<artifactId>java8</artifactId>
<version>${pact.version}</version>
</dependency>
```
## Usage
Start with a static import of `LambdaDsl`. This class contains factory methods for the lambda dsl extension.
When you come accross the `body()` method of `PactDslWithProvider` builder start using the new extensions.
The call to `LambdaDsl` replaces the call to instance `new PactDslJsonArray()` and `new PactDslJsonBody()` of the pact library.
```java
io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.*
```
### Response body as json array
```java
import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonArray;
...
PactDslWithProvider builder = ...
builder.given("some state")
.uponReceiving("a request")
.path("/my-app/my-service")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.status(200)
.body(newJsonArray((a) -> {
a.stringValue("a1");
a.stringValue("a2");
}).build());
```
### Response body as json object
```java
import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonBody;
...
PactDslWithProvider builder = ...
builder.given("some state")
.uponReceiving("a request")
.path("/my-app/my-service")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.status(200)
.body(newJsonBody((o) -> {
o.stringValue("foo", "Foo");
o.stringValue("bar", "Bar");
}).build());
```
### Examples
#### Simple Json object
When creating simple json structures the difference between the two approaches isn't big.
##### JSON
```json
{
"bar": "Bar",
"foo": "Foo"
}
```
##### Pact DSL
```java
new PactDslJsonBody()
.stringValue("foo", "Foo")
.stringValue("bar", "Bar")
```
##### Lambda DSL
```java
newJsonBody((o) -> {
o.stringValue("foo", "Foo");
o.stringValue("bar", "Bar");
}).build();
```
#### An array of arrays
When we come to more complex constructs with arrays and nested objects the beauty of lambdas become visible!
##### JSON
```json
[
["a1", "a2"],
[1, 2],
[{"foo": "Foo"}]
]
```
##### Pact DSL
```java
new PactDslJsonArray()
.array()
.stringValue("a1")
.stringValue("a2")
.closeArray()
.array()
.numberValue(1)
.numberValue(2)
.closeArray()
.array()
.object()
.stringValue("foo", "Foo")
.closeObject()
.closeArray();
```
##### Lambda DSL
```java
newJsonArray((rootArray) -> {
rootArray.array((a) -> a.stringValue("a1").stringValue("a2"));
rootArray.array((a) -> a.numberValue(1).numberValue(2));
rootArray.array((a) -> a.object((o) -> o.stringValue("foo", "Foo")));
}).build();
```
##### Kotlin Lambda DSL
```kotlin
newJsonArray {
newArray {
stringValue("a1")
stringValue("a2")
}
newArray {
numberValue(1)
numberValue(2)
}
newArray {
newObject { stringValue("foo", "Foo") }
}
}
```
# Test Analytics
We are tracking anonymous analytics to gather important usage statistics like JVM version
and operating system. To disable tracking, set the 'pact_do_not_track' system property or environment
variable to 'true'.
Files of the artifact java8 version 4.1.43 from the group au.com.dius.pact.consumer.
Artifact java8
Group au.com.dius.pact.consumer
Version 4.1.43
Last update 12. July 2024
Tags: called allowed usage objects lamda your ambiguous issues when tracking artifact path lambda java closing pact complex property whereas state between based closeobject using method dependency work want come version contains extensions system examples stringvalue following creating difference artifactid arrays quot much formatting object status become pactdslwithprovider extension works methods pact_do_not_track willrespondwith example valid pactdsljsonbody default library java8 installation builder lambdas course closearray attribute operating close hand uponreceiving could replaces more makes structures possible sample great call such disable newjsonbody anonymous prone certain open apos statistics auto instance correct beauty available main accross simple newarray source body nested analytics suggests that indentation newjsonarray find solves only quite newobject wrapped group given visible read static test need like maven cleaner finally groupid this runtime gather pactfoundation both becomes important pactdsljsonarray tests lambdadsl name true some request code import provided back choose dius error constructs states central array provides working json rootarray hard class consumer factory junit implementation start kotlin approaches opening cumbersome with existing environment currently build response service there variable numbervalue tarobject
Organization not specified
URL https://github.com/DiUS/pact-jvm
License Apache 2
Dependencies amount 1
Dependencies consumer,
There are maybe transitive dependencies!
Group au.com.dius.pact.consumer
Version 4.1.43
Last update 12. July 2024
Tags: called allowed usage objects lamda your ambiguous issues when tracking artifact path lambda java closing pact complex property whereas state between based closeobject using method dependency work want come version contains extensions system examples stringvalue following creating difference artifactid arrays quot much formatting object status become pactdslwithprovider extension works methods pact_do_not_track willrespondwith example valid pactdsljsonbody default library java8 installation builder lambdas course closearray attribute operating close hand uponreceiving could replaces more makes structures possible sample great call such disable newjsonbody anonymous prone certain open apos statistics auto instance correct beauty available main accross simple newarray source body nested analytics suggests that indentation newjsonarray find solves only quite newobject wrapped group given visible read static test need like maven cleaner finally groupid this runtime gather pactfoundation both becomes important pactdsljsonarray tests lambdadsl name true some request code import provided back choose dius error constructs states central array provides working json rootarray hard class consumer factory junit implementation start kotlin approaches opening cumbersome with existing environment currently build response service there variable numbervalue tarobject
Organization not specified
URL https://github.com/DiUS/pact-jvm
License Apache 2
Dependencies amount 1
Dependencies consumer,
There are maybe transitive dependencies!
The newest version!
Show all versions of java8 Show documentation
Please rate this JAR file. Is it a good library?
java8
Rate from 1 - 5,
Rated 1.00 based on 1 reviews
0 downloads
Source code of java8 version 4.1.43
META-INF
io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl
© 2015 - 2024 Weber Informatics LLC | Privacy Policy