com.clarifai.grpc.api.PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction Maven / Gradle / Ivy
The newest version!
// Generated by the protocol buffer compiler. DO NOT EDIT!
// source: proto/clarifai/api/service.proto
package com.clarifai.grpc.api;
/**
* Protobuf enum {@code clarifai.api.PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction}
*/
public enum PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction
implements com.google.protobuf.ProtocolMessageEnum {
/**
* PUT_TASK_ASSIGNMENTS_REQUEST_ACTION_NOT_SET = 0;
*/
PUT_TASK_ASSIGNMENTS_REQUEST_ACTION_NOT_SET(0),
/**
*
* Create a list of task assignments for labeler => 10 inputs are assigned to the labeler.
* This is a fully sync action.
* If task assignments already exist, then return existing task assignments.
*
*
* LABEL_START = 1;
*/
LABEL_START(1),
/**
*
* Submit task assignments => mark task assignment work as completed.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated as follows:
* * when review_strategy is NONE, then task assignment status is updated to SUCCESS.
* * when review strategy is CONSENSUS, then task assignment status is updated to AWAITING_CONSENSUS_REVIEW.
* * when review strategy is MANUAL, then task assignment status is updated to AWAITING_REVIEW.
* If task assignments are already submitted, then no update is performed on them.
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated as follows:
* * when review_strategy is NONE, then annotation status is updated to SUCCESS.
* * when review strategy is CONSENSUS, then annotation status is updated to SUCCESS (if it reaches consensus) or AWAITING_REVIEW (if it does not reach consensus).
* * when review strategy is MANUAL, then annotation status is updated to AWAITING_REVIEW.
*
*
* LABEL_SUBMIT = 2;
*/
LABEL_SUBMIT(2),
/**
*
* Return a list of task assignments for reviewer to review => 10 inputs are assigned to the reviewer.
* This is a fully sync action.
* NOT idempotent:
* In the current implementation, we don't actually store the reviewer in the task assignment,
* as the task assignment still stays assigned to the labeler.
* Therefore, multiple calls to this endpoint may result in different set of task assignments to review.
* For now, this action is practically not idempotent.
* In the future, we could however store the reviewer in the task assignment and
* return existing task assignments already assigned to the reviewer => this will make this action idempotent.
*
*
* REVIEW_START = 10;
*/
REVIEW_START(10),
/**
*
* Approve task assignments.
* There are two types of configurations:
* * Batch approve: approve a list of task assignment IDs;
* * Bulk approve: approve all task assignments from a list of workers.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated to SUCCESS
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated to SUCCESS
*
*
* REVIEW_APPROVE = 11;
*/
REVIEW_APPROVE(11),
/**
*
* Request changes for task assignments.
* There are two types of configurations:
* * Batch request changes: request changes for a list of task assignment IDs;
* * Bulk request changes: request changes for all task assignments from a list of workers.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated to PENDING
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated to PENDING
*
*
* REVIEW_REQUEST_CHANGES = 12;
*/
REVIEW_REQUEST_CHANGES(12),
/**
*
* Reject task assignments.
* There are two types of configurations:
* * Batch reject: reject a list of task assignment IDs;
* * Bulk reject: reject all task assignments from a list of workers.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated to REVIEW_DENIED
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated to REVIEW_DENIED
*
*
* REVIEW_REJECT = 13;
*/
REVIEW_REJECT(13),
UNRECOGNIZED(-1),
;
/**
* PUT_TASK_ASSIGNMENTS_REQUEST_ACTION_NOT_SET = 0;
*/
public static final int PUT_TASK_ASSIGNMENTS_REQUEST_ACTION_NOT_SET_VALUE = 0;
/**
*
* Create a list of task assignments for labeler => 10 inputs are assigned to the labeler.
* This is a fully sync action.
* If task assignments already exist, then return existing task assignments.
*
*
* LABEL_START = 1;
*/
public static final int LABEL_START_VALUE = 1;
/**
*
* Submit task assignments => mark task assignment work as completed.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated as follows:
* * when review_strategy is NONE, then task assignment status is updated to SUCCESS.
* * when review strategy is CONSENSUS, then task assignment status is updated to AWAITING_CONSENSUS_REVIEW.
* * when review strategy is MANUAL, then task assignment status is updated to AWAITING_REVIEW.
* If task assignments are already submitted, then no update is performed on them.
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated as follows:
* * when review_strategy is NONE, then annotation status is updated to SUCCESS.
* * when review strategy is CONSENSUS, then annotation status is updated to SUCCESS (if it reaches consensus) or AWAITING_REVIEW (if it does not reach consensus).
* * when review strategy is MANUAL, then annotation status is updated to AWAITING_REVIEW.
*
*
* LABEL_SUBMIT = 2;
*/
public static final int LABEL_SUBMIT_VALUE = 2;
/**
*
* Return a list of task assignments for reviewer to review => 10 inputs are assigned to the reviewer.
* This is a fully sync action.
* NOT idempotent:
* In the current implementation, we don't actually store the reviewer in the task assignment,
* as the task assignment still stays assigned to the labeler.
* Therefore, multiple calls to this endpoint may result in different set of task assignments to review.
* For now, this action is practically not idempotent.
* In the future, we could however store the reviewer in the task assignment and
* return existing task assignments already assigned to the reviewer => this will make this action idempotent.
*
*
* REVIEW_START = 10;
*/
public static final int REVIEW_START_VALUE = 10;
/**
*
* Approve task assignments.
* There are two types of configurations:
* * Batch approve: approve a list of task assignment IDs;
* * Bulk approve: approve all task assignments from a list of workers.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated to SUCCESS
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated to SUCCESS
*
*
* REVIEW_APPROVE = 11;
*/
public static final int REVIEW_APPROVE_VALUE = 11;
/**
*
* Request changes for task assignments.
* There are two types of configurations:
* * Batch request changes: request changes for a list of task assignment IDs;
* * Bulk request changes: request changes for all task assignments from a list of workers.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated to PENDING
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated to PENDING
*
*
* REVIEW_REQUEST_CHANGES = 12;
*/
public static final int REVIEW_REQUEST_CHANGES_VALUE = 12;
/**
*
* Reject task assignments.
* There are two types of configurations:
* * Batch reject: reject a list of task assignment IDs;
* * Bulk reject: reject all task assignments from a list of workers.
* This is a partially sync action.
* Sync: task assignments are updated to REVIEW_DENIED
* Async: annotations added for the same input as the task assignment are updated to REVIEW_DENIED
*
*
* REVIEW_REJECT = 13;
*/
public static final int REVIEW_REJECT_VALUE = 13;
public final int getNumber() {
if (this == UNRECOGNIZED) {
throw new java.lang.IllegalArgumentException(
"Can't get the number of an unknown enum value.");
}
return value;
}
/**
* @param value The numeric wire value of the corresponding enum entry.
* @return The enum associated with the given numeric wire value.
* @deprecated Use {@link #forNumber(int)} instead.
*/
@java.lang.Deprecated
public static PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction valueOf(int value) {
return forNumber(value);
}
/**
* @param value The numeric wire value of the corresponding enum entry.
* @return The enum associated with the given numeric wire value.
*/
public static PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction forNumber(int value) {
switch (value) {
case 0: return PUT_TASK_ASSIGNMENTS_REQUEST_ACTION_NOT_SET;
case 1: return LABEL_START;
case 2: return LABEL_SUBMIT;
case 10: return REVIEW_START;
case 11: return REVIEW_APPROVE;
case 12: return REVIEW_REQUEST_CHANGES;
case 13: return REVIEW_REJECT;
default: return null;
}
}
public static com.google.protobuf.Internal.EnumLiteMap
internalGetValueMap() {
return internalValueMap;
}
private static final com.google.protobuf.Internal.EnumLiteMap<
PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction> internalValueMap =
new com.google.protobuf.Internal.EnumLiteMap() {
public PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction findValueByNumber(int number) {
return PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction.forNumber(number);
}
};
public final com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.EnumValueDescriptor
getValueDescriptor() {
if (this == UNRECOGNIZED) {
throw new java.lang.IllegalStateException(
"Can't get the descriptor of an unrecognized enum value.");
}
return getDescriptor().getValues().get(ordinal());
}
public final com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.EnumDescriptor
getDescriptorForType() {
return getDescriptor();
}
public static final com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.EnumDescriptor
getDescriptor() {
return com.clarifai.grpc.api.Service.getDescriptor().getEnumTypes().get(1);
}
private static final PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction[] VALUES = values();
public static PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction valueOf(
com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.EnumValueDescriptor desc) {
if (desc.getType() != getDescriptor()) {
throw new java.lang.IllegalArgumentException(
"EnumValueDescriptor is not for this type.");
}
if (desc.getIndex() == -1) {
return UNRECOGNIZED;
}
return VALUES[desc.getIndex()];
}
private final int value;
private PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
// @@protoc_insertion_point(enum_scope:clarifai.api.PutTaskAssignmentsRequestAction)
}