org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.Optimizer.scala Maven / Gradle / Ivy
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer
import scala.collection.mutable
import org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.{InMemoryCatalog, SessionCatalog}
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules._
import org.apache.spark.sql.connector.catalog.CatalogManager
import org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SQLConf
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
/**
* Abstract class all optimizers should inherit of, contains the standard batches (extending
* Optimizers can override this.
*/
abstract class Optimizer(catalogManager: CatalogManager)
extends RuleExecutor[LogicalPlan] {
// Check for structural integrity of the plan in test mode.
// Currently we check after the execution of each rule if a plan:
// - is still resolved
// - only host special expressions in supported operators
// - has globally-unique attribute IDs
override protected def isPlanIntegral(plan: LogicalPlan): Boolean = {
!Utils.isTesting || (plan.resolved &&
plan.find(PlanHelper.specialExpressionsInUnsupportedOperator(_).nonEmpty).isEmpty &&
LogicalPlanIntegrity.checkIfExprIdsAreGloballyUnique(plan))
}
override protected val excludedOnceBatches: Set[String] =
Set(
"PartitionPruning",
"Extract Python UDFs")
protected def fixedPoint =
FixedPoint(
SQLConf.get.optimizerMaxIterations,
maxIterationsSetting = SQLConf.OPTIMIZER_MAX_ITERATIONS.key)
/**
* Defines the default rule batches in the Optimizer.
*
* Implementations of this class should override this method, and [[nonExcludableRules]] if
* necessary, instead of [[batches]]. The rule batches that eventually run in the Optimizer,
* i.e., returned by [[batches]], will be (defaultBatches - (excludedRules - nonExcludableRules)).
*/
def defaultBatches: Seq[Batch] = {
val operatorOptimizationRuleSet =
Seq(
// Operator push down
PushProjectionThroughUnion,
ReorderJoin,
EliminateOuterJoin,
PushDownPredicates,
PushDownLeftSemiAntiJoin,
PushLeftSemiLeftAntiThroughJoin,
LimitPushDown,
ColumnPruning,
// Operator combine
CollapseRepartition,
CollapseProject,
OptimizeWindowFunctions,
CollapseWindow,
CombineFilters,
EliminateLimits,
CombineUnions,
// Constant folding and strength reduction
TransposeWindow,
NullPropagation,
ConstantPropagation,
FoldablePropagation,
OptimizeIn,
ConstantFolding,
EliminateAggregateFilter,
ReorderAssociativeOperator,
LikeSimplification,
BooleanSimplification,
SimplifyConditionals,
RemoveDispensableExpressions,
SimplifyBinaryComparison,
ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicate,
PruneFilters,
SimplifyCasts,
SimplifyCaseConversionExpressions,
RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery,
EliminateSerialization,
RemoveRedundantAliases,
UnwrapCastInBinaryComparison,
RemoveNoopOperators,
OptimizeUpdateFields,
SimplifyExtractValueOps,
OptimizeJsonExprs,
CombineConcats) ++
extendedOperatorOptimizationRules
val operatorOptimizationBatch: Seq[Batch] = {
Batch("Operator Optimization before Inferring Filters", fixedPoint,
operatorOptimizationRuleSet: _*) ::
Batch("Infer Filters", Once,
InferFiltersFromGenerate,
InferFiltersFromConstraints) ::
Batch("Operator Optimization after Inferring Filters", fixedPoint,
operatorOptimizationRuleSet: _*) ::
// Set strategy to Once to avoid pushing filter every time because we do not change the
// join condition.
Batch("Push extra predicate through join", fixedPoint,
PushExtraPredicateThroughJoin,
PushDownPredicates) :: Nil
}
val batches = (Batch("Eliminate Distinct", Once, EliminateDistinct) ::
// Technically some of the rules in Finish Analysis are not optimizer rules and belong more
// in the analyzer, because they are needed for correctness (e.g. ComputeCurrentTime).
// However, because we also use the analyzer to canonicalized queries (for view definition),
// we do not eliminate subqueries or compute current time in the analyzer.
Batch("Finish Analysis", Once,
EliminateResolvedHint,
EliminateSubqueryAliases,
EliminateView,
ReplaceExpressions,
RewriteNonCorrelatedExists,
ComputeCurrentTime,
GetCurrentDatabaseAndCatalog(catalogManager),
ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate) ::
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Optimizer rules start here
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// - Do the first call of CombineUnions before starting the major Optimizer rules,
// since it can reduce the number of iteration and the other rules could add/move
// extra operators between two adjacent Union operators.
// - Call CombineUnions again in Batch("Operator Optimizations"),
// since the other rules might make two separate Unions operators adjacent.
Batch("Union", Once,
CombineUnions) ::
Batch("OptimizeLimitZero", Once,
OptimizeLimitZero) ::
// Run this once earlier. This might simplify the plan and reduce cost of optimizer.
// For example, a query such as Filter(LocalRelation) would go through all the heavy
// optimizer rules that are triggered when there is a filter
// (e.g. InferFiltersFromConstraints). If we run this batch earlier, the query becomes just
// LocalRelation and does not trigger many rules.
Batch("LocalRelation early", fixedPoint,
ConvertToLocalRelation,
PropagateEmptyRelation,
// PropagateEmptyRelation can change the nullability of an attribute from nullable to
// non-nullable when an empty relation child of a Union is removed
UpdateAttributeNullability) ::
Batch("Pullup Correlated Expressions", Once,
PullupCorrelatedPredicates) ::
// Subquery batch applies the optimizer rules recursively. Therefore, it makes no sense
// to enforce idempotence on it and we change this batch from Once to FixedPoint(1).
Batch("Subquery", FixedPoint(1),
OptimizeSubqueries) ::
Batch("Replace Operators", fixedPoint,
RewriteExceptAll,
RewriteIntersectAll,
ReplaceIntersectWithSemiJoin,
ReplaceExceptWithFilter,
ReplaceExceptWithAntiJoin,
ReplaceDistinctWithAggregate) ::
Batch("Aggregate", fixedPoint,
RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions,
RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions) :: Nil ++
operatorOptimizationBatch) :+
// This batch rewrites plans after the operator optimization and
// before any batches that depend on stats.
Batch("Pre CBO Rules", Once, preCBORules: _*) :+
// This batch pushes filters and projections into scan nodes. Before this batch, the logical
// plan may contain nodes that do not report stats. Anything that uses stats must run after
// this batch.
Batch("Early Filter and Projection Push-Down", Once, earlyScanPushDownRules: _*) :+
// Since join costs in AQP can change between multiple runs, there is no reason that we have an
// idempotence enforcement on this batch. We thus make it FixedPoint(1) instead of Once.
Batch("Join Reorder", FixedPoint(1),
CostBasedJoinReorder) :+
Batch("Eliminate Sorts", Once,
EliminateSorts) :+
Batch("Decimal Optimizations", fixedPoint,
DecimalAggregates) :+
// This batch must run after "Decimal Optimizations", as that one may change the
// aggregate distinct column
Batch("Distinct Aggregate Rewrite", Once,
RewriteDistinctAggregates) :+
Batch("Object Expressions Optimization", fixedPoint,
EliminateMapObjects,
CombineTypedFilters,
ObjectSerializerPruning,
ReassignLambdaVariableID) :+
Batch("LocalRelation", fixedPoint,
ConvertToLocalRelation,
PropagateEmptyRelation,
// PropagateEmptyRelation can change the nullability of an attribute from nullable to
// non-nullable when an empty relation child of a Union is removed
UpdateAttributeNullability) :+
// The following batch should be executed after batch "Join Reorder" and "LocalRelation".
Batch("Check Cartesian Products", Once,
CheckCartesianProducts) :+
Batch("RewriteSubquery", Once,
RewritePredicateSubquery,
ColumnPruning,
CollapseProject,
RemoveNoopOperators) :+
// This batch must be executed after the `RewriteSubquery` batch, which creates joins.
Batch("NormalizeFloatingNumbers", Once, NormalizeFloatingNumbers) :+
Batch("ReplaceUpdateFieldsExpression", Once, ReplaceUpdateFieldsExpression)
// remove any batches with no rules. this may happen when subclasses do not add optional rules.
batches.filter(_.rules.nonEmpty)
}
/**
* Defines rules that cannot be excluded from the Optimizer even if they are specified in
* SQL config "excludedRules".
*
* Implementations of this class can override this method if necessary. The rule batches
* that eventually run in the Optimizer, i.e., returned by [[batches]], will be
* (defaultBatches - (excludedRules - nonExcludableRules)).
*/
def nonExcludableRules: Seq[String] =
EliminateDistinct.ruleName ::
EliminateResolvedHint.ruleName ::
EliminateSubqueryAliases.ruleName ::
EliminateView.ruleName ::
ReplaceExpressions.ruleName ::
ComputeCurrentTime.ruleName ::
GetCurrentDatabaseAndCatalog(catalogManager).ruleName ::
RewriteDistinctAggregates.ruleName ::
ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate.ruleName ::
ReplaceIntersectWithSemiJoin.ruleName ::
ReplaceExceptWithFilter.ruleName ::
ReplaceExceptWithAntiJoin.ruleName ::
RewriteExceptAll.ruleName ::
RewriteIntersectAll.ruleName ::
ReplaceDistinctWithAggregate.ruleName ::
PullupCorrelatedPredicates.ruleName ::
RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery.ruleName ::
RewritePredicateSubquery.ruleName ::
NormalizeFloatingNumbers.ruleName ::
ReplaceUpdateFieldsExpression.ruleName :: Nil
/**
* Optimize all the subqueries inside expression.
*/
object OptimizeSubqueries extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
private def removeTopLevelSort(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = {
plan match {
case Sort(_, _, child) => child
case Project(fields, child) => Project(fields, removeTopLevelSort(child))
case other => other
}
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformAllExpressions {
case s: SubqueryExpression =>
val Subquery(newPlan, _) = Optimizer.this.execute(Subquery.fromExpression(s))
// At this point we have an optimized subquery plan that we are going to attach
// to this subquery expression. Here we can safely remove any top level sort
// in the plan as tuples produced by a subquery are un-ordered.
s.withNewPlan(removeTopLevelSort(newPlan))
}
}
/**
* Override to provide additional rules for the operator optimization batch.
*/
def extendedOperatorOptimizationRules: Seq[Rule[LogicalPlan]] = Nil
/**
* Override to provide additional rules for early projection and filter pushdown to scans.
*/
def earlyScanPushDownRules: Seq[Rule[LogicalPlan]] = Nil
/**
* Override to provide additional rules for rewriting plans after operator optimization rules and
* before any cost-based optimization rules that depend on stats.
*/
def preCBORules: Seq[Rule[LogicalPlan]] = Nil
/**
* Returns (defaultBatches - (excludedRules - nonExcludableRules)), the rule batches that
* eventually run in the Optimizer.
*
* Implementations of this class should override [[defaultBatches]], and [[nonExcludableRules]]
* if necessary, instead of this method.
*/
final override def batches: Seq[Batch] = {
val excludedRulesConf =
SQLConf.get.optimizerExcludedRules.toSeq.flatMap(Utils.stringToSeq)
val excludedRules = excludedRulesConf.filter { ruleName =>
val nonExcludable = nonExcludableRules.contains(ruleName)
if (nonExcludable) {
logWarning(s"Optimization rule '${ruleName}' was not excluded from the optimizer " +
s"because this rule is a non-excludable rule.")
}
!nonExcludable
}
if (excludedRules.isEmpty) {
defaultBatches
} else {
defaultBatches.flatMap { batch =>
val filteredRules = batch.rules.filter { rule =>
val exclude = excludedRules.contains(rule.ruleName)
if (exclude) {
logInfo(s"Optimization rule '${rule.ruleName}' is excluded from the optimizer.")
}
!exclude
}
if (batch.rules == filteredRules) {
Some(batch)
} else if (filteredRules.nonEmpty) {
Some(Batch(batch.name, batch.strategy, filteredRules: _*))
} else {
logInfo(s"Optimization batch '${batch.name}' is excluded from the optimizer " +
s"as all enclosed rules have been excluded.")
None
}
}
}
}
}
/**
* Remove useless DISTINCT for MAX and MIN.
* This rule should be applied before RewriteDistinctAggregates.
*/
object EliminateDistinct extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformExpressions {
case ae: AggregateExpression if ae.isDistinct =>
ae.aggregateFunction match {
case _: Max | _: Min => ae.copy(isDistinct = false)
case _ => ae
}
}
}
/**
* Remove useless FILTER clause for aggregate expressions.
* This rule should be applied before RewriteDistinctAggregates.
*/
object EliminateAggregateFilter extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformExpressions {
case ae @ AggregateExpression(_, _, _, Some(Literal.TrueLiteral), _) =>
ae.copy(filter = None)
case AggregateExpression(af: DeclarativeAggregate, _, _, Some(Literal.FalseLiteral), _) =>
val initialProject = SafeProjection.create(af.initialValues)
val evalProject = SafeProjection.create(af.evaluateExpression :: Nil, af.aggBufferAttributes)
val initialBuffer = initialProject(EmptyRow)
val internalRow = evalProject(initialBuffer)
Literal.create(internalRow.get(0, af.dataType), af.dataType)
case AggregateExpression(af: ImperativeAggregate, _, _, Some(Literal.FalseLiteral), _) =>
val buffer = new SpecificInternalRow(af.aggBufferAttributes.map(_.dataType))
af.initialize(buffer)
Literal.create(af.eval(buffer), af.dataType)
}
}
/**
* An optimizer used in test code.
*
* To ensure extendability, we leave the standard rules in the abstract optimizer rules, while
* specific rules go to the subclasses
*/
object SimpleTestOptimizer extends SimpleTestOptimizer
class SimpleTestOptimizer extends Optimizer(
new CatalogManager(
FakeV2SessionCatalog,
new SessionCatalog(new InMemoryCatalog, EmptyFunctionRegistry)))
/**
* Remove redundant aliases from a query plan. A redundant alias is an alias that does not change
* the name or metadata of a column, and does not deduplicate it.
*/
object RemoveRedundantAliases extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
/**
* Create an attribute mapping from the old to the new attributes. This function will only
* return the attribute pairs that have changed.
*/
private def createAttributeMapping(current: LogicalPlan, next: LogicalPlan)
: Seq[(Attribute, Attribute)] = {
current.output.zip(next.output).filterNot {
case (a1, a2) => a1.semanticEquals(a2)
}
}
/**
* Remove the top-level alias from an expression when it is redundant.
*/
private def removeRedundantAlias(e: Expression, excludeList: AttributeSet): Expression = e match {
// Alias with metadata can not be stripped, or the metadata will be lost.
// If the alias name is different from attribute name, we can't strip it either, or we
// may accidentally change the output schema name of the root plan.
case a @ Alias(attr: Attribute, name)
if (a.metadata == Metadata.empty || a.metadata == attr.metadata) &&
name == attr.name &&
!excludeList.contains(attr) &&
!excludeList.contains(a) =>
attr
case a => a
}
/**
* Remove redundant alias expression from a LogicalPlan and its subtree. A set of excludes is used
* to prevent the removal of seemingly redundant aliases used to deduplicate the input for a
* (self) join or to prevent the removal of top-level subquery attributes.
*/
private def removeRedundantAliases(plan: LogicalPlan, excluded: AttributeSet): LogicalPlan = {
plan match {
// We want to keep the same output attributes for subqueries. This means we cannot remove
// the aliases that produce these attributes
case Subquery(child, correlated) =>
Subquery(removeRedundantAliases(child, excluded ++ child.outputSet), correlated)
// A join has to be treated differently, because the left and the right side of the join are
// not allowed to use the same attributes. We use an exclude list to prevent us from creating
// a situation in which this happens; the rule will only remove an alias if its child
// attribute is not on the black list.
case Join(left, right, joinType, condition, hint) =>
val newLeft = removeRedundantAliases(left, excluded ++ right.outputSet)
val newRight = removeRedundantAliases(right, excluded ++ newLeft.outputSet)
val mapping = AttributeMap(
createAttributeMapping(left, newLeft) ++
createAttributeMapping(right, newRight))
val newCondition = condition.map(_.transform {
case a: Attribute => mapping.getOrElse(a, a)
})
Join(newLeft, newRight, joinType, newCondition, hint)
case _ =>
// Remove redundant aliases in the subtree(s).
val currentNextAttrPairs = mutable.Buffer.empty[(Attribute, Attribute)]
val newNode = plan.mapChildren { child =>
val newChild = removeRedundantAliases(child, excluded)
currentNextAttrPairs ++= createAttributeMapping(child, newChild)
newChild
}
// Create the attribute mapping. Note that the currentNextAttrPairs can contain duplicate
// keys in case of Union (this is caused by the PushProjectionThroughUnion rule); in this
// case we use the first mapping (which should be provided by the first child).
val mapping = AttributeMap(currentNextAttrPairs.toSeq)
// Create a an expression cleaning function for nodes that can actually produce redundant
// aliases, use identity otherwise.
val clean: Expression => Expression = plan match {
case _: Project => removeRedundantAlias(_, excluded)
case _: Aggregate => removeRedundantAlias(_, excluded)
case _: Window => removeRedundantAlias(_, excluded)
case _ => identity[Expression]
}
// Transform the expressions.
newNode.mapExpressions { expr =>
clean(expr.transform {
case a: Attribute => mapping.getOrElse(a, a)
})
}
}
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = removeRedundantAliases(plan, AttributeSet.empty)
}
/**
* Remove no-op operators from the query plan that do not make any modifications.
*/
object RemoveNoopOperators extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
// Eliminate no-op Projects
case p @ Project(_, child) if child.sameOutput(p) => child
// Eliminate no-op Window
case w: Window if w.windowExpressions.isEmpty => w.child
}
}
/**
* Pushes down [[LocalLimit]] beneath UNION ALL and beneath the streamed inputs of outer joins.
*/
object LimitPushDown extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
private def stripGlobalLimitIfPresent(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = {
plan match {
case GlobalLimit(_, child) => child
case _ => plan
}
}
private def maybePushLocalLimit(limitExp: Expression, plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = {
(limitExp, plan.maxRowsPerPartition) match {
case (IntegerLiteral(newLimit), Some(childMaxRows)) if newLimit < childMaxRows =>
// If the child has a cap on max rows per partition and the cap is larger than
// the new limit, put a new LocalLimit there.
LocalLimit(limitExp, stripGlobalLimitIfPresent(plan))
case (_, None) =>
// If the child has no cap, put the new LocalLimit.
LocalLimit(limitExp, stripGlobalLimitIfPresent(plan))
case _ =>
// Otherwise, don't put a new LocalLimit.
plan
}
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
// Adding extra Limits below UNION ALL for children which are not Limit or do not have Limit
// descendants whose maxRow is larger. This heuristic is valid assuming there does not exist any
// Limit push-down rule that is unable to infer the value of maxRows.
// Note: right now Union means UNION ALL, which does not de-duplicate rows, so it is safe to
// pushdown Limit through it. Once we add UNION DISTINCT, however, we will not be able to
// pushdown Limit.
case LocalLimit(exp, u: Union) =>
LocalLimit(exp, u.copy(children = u.children.map(maybePushLocalLimit(exp, _))))
// Add extra limits below OUTER JOIN. For LEFT OUTER and RIGHT OUTER JOIN we push limits to
// the left and right sides, respectively. It's not safe to push limits below FULL OUTER
// JOIN in the general case without a more invasive rewrite.
// We also need to ensure that this limit pushdown rule will not eventually introduce limits
// on both sides if it is applied multiple times. Therefore:
// - If one side is already limited, stack another limit on top if the new limit is smaller.
// The redundant limit will be collapsed by the CombineLimits rule.
case LocalLimit(exp, join @ Join(left, right, joinType, _, _)) =>
val newJoin = joinType match {
case RightOuter => join.copy(right = maybePushLocalLimit(exp, right))
case LeftOuter => join.copy(left = maybePushLocalLimit(exp, left))
case _ => join
}
LocalLimit(exp, newJoin)
}
}
/**
* Pushes Project operator to both sides of a Union operator.
* Operations that are safe to pushdown are listed as follows.
* Union:
* Right now, Union means UNION ALL, which does not de-duplicate rows. So, it is
* safe to pushdown Filters and Projections through it. Filter pushdown is handled by another
* rule PushDownPredicates. Once we add UNION DISTINCT, we will not be able to pushdown Projections.
*/
object PushProjectionThroughUnion extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
/**
* Maps Attributes from the left side to the corresponding Attribute on the right side.
*/
private def buildRewrites(left: LogicalPlan, right: LogicalPlan): AttributeMap[Attribute] = {
assert(left.output.size == right.output.size)
AttributeMap(left.output.zip(right.output))
}
/**
* Rewrites an expression so that it can be pushed to the right side of a
* Union or Except operator. This method relies on the fact that the output attributes
* of a union/intersect/except are always equal to the left child's output.
*/
private def pushToRight[A <: Expression](e: A, rewrites: AttributeMap[Attribute]) = {
val result = e transform {
case a: Attribute => rewrites(a)
} match {
// Make sure exprId is unique in each child of Union.
case Alias(child, alias) => Alias(child, alias)()
case other => other
}
// We must promise the compiler that we did not discard the names in the case of project
// expressions. This is safe since the only transformation is from Attribute => Attribute.
result.asInstanceOf[A]
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
// Push down deterministic projection through UNION ALL
case p @ Project(projectList, u: Union) =>
assert(u.children.nonEmpty)
if (projectList.forall(_.deterministic)) {
val newFirstChild = Project(projectList, u.children.head)
val newOtherChildren = u.children.tail.map { child =>
val rewrites = buildRewrites(u.children.head, child)
Project(projectList.map(pushToRight(_, rewrites)), child)
}
u.copy(children = newFirstChild +: newOtherChildren)
} else {
p
}
}
}
/**
* Attempts to eliminate the reading of unneeded columns from the query plan.
*
* Since adding Project before Filter conflicts with PushPredicatesThroughProject, this rule will
* remove the Project p2 in the following pattern:
*
* p1 @ Project(_, Filter(_, p2 @ Project(_, child))) if p2.outputSet.subsetOf(p2.inputSet)
*
* p2 is usually inserted by this rule and useless, p1 could prune the columns anyway.
*/
object ColumnPruning extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = removeProjectBeforeFilter(plan transform {
// Prunes the unused columns from project list of Project/Aggregate/Expand
case p @ Project(_, p2: Project) if !p2.outputSet.subsetOf(p.references) =>
p.copy(child = p2.copy(projectList = p2.projectList.filter(p.references.contains)))
case p @ Project(_, a: Aggregate) if !a.outputSet.subsetOf(p.references) =>
p.copy(
child = a.copy(aggregateExpressions = a.aggregateExpressions.filter(p.references.contains)))
case a @ Project(_, e @ Expand(_, _, grandChild)) if !e.outputSet.subsetOf(a.references) =>
val newOutput = e.output.filter(a.references.contains(_))
val newProjects = e.projections.map { proj =>
proj.zip(e.output).filter { case (_, a) =>
newOutput.contains(a)
}.unzip._1
}
a.copy(child = Expand(newProjects, newOutput, grandChild))
// Prunes the unused columns from child of `DeserializeToObject`
case d @ DeserializeToObject(_, _, child) if !child.outputSet.subsetOf(d.references) =>
d.copy(child = prunedChild(child, d.references))
// Prunes the unused columns from child of Aggregate/Expand/Generate/ScriptTransformation
case a @ Aggregate(_, _, child) if !child.outputSet.subsetOf(a.references) =>
a.copy(child = prunedChild(child, a.references))
case f @ FlatMapGroupsInPandas(_, _, _, child) if !child.outputSet.subsetOf(f.references) =>
f.copy(child = prunedChild(child, f.references))
case e @ Expand(_, _, child) if !child.outputSet.subsetOf(e.references) =>
e.copy(child = prunedChild(child, e.references))
case s @ ScriptTransformation(_, _, _, child, _)
if !child.outputSet.subsetOf(s.references) =>
s.copy(child = prunedChild(child, s.references))
// prune unrequired references
case p @ Project(_, g: Generate) if p.references != g.outputSet =>
val requiredAttrs = p.references -- g.producedAttributes ++ g.generator.references
val newChild = prunedChild(g.child, requiredAttrs)
val unrequired = g.generator.references -- p.references
val unrequiredIndices = newChild.output.zipWithIndex.filter(t => unrequired.contains(t._1))
.map(_._2)
p.copy(child = g.copy(child = newChild, unrequiredChildIndex = unrequiredIndices))
// prune unrequired nested fields from `Generate`.
case GeneratorNestedColumnAliasing(p) => p
// Eliminate unneeded attributes from right side of a Left Existence Join.
case j @ Join(_, right, LeftExistence(_), _, _) =>
j.copy(right = prunedChild(right, j.references))
// all the columns will be used to compare, so we can't prune them
case p @ Project(_, _: SetOperation) => p
case p @ Project(_, _: Distinct) => p
// Eliminate unneeded attributes from children of Union.
case p @ Project(_, u: Union) =>
if (!u.outputSet.subsetOf(p.references)) {
val firstChild = u.children.head
val newOutput = prunedChild(firstChild, p.references).output
// pruning the columns of all children based on the pruned first child.
val newChildren = u.children.map { p =>
val selected = p.output.zipWithIndex.filter { case (a, i) =>
newOutput.contains(firstChild.output(i))
}.map(_._1)
Project(selected, p)
}
p.copy(child = u.withNewChildren(newChildren))
} else {
p
}
// Prune unnecessary window expressions
case p @ Project(_, w: Window) if !w.windowOutputSet.subsetOf(p.references) =>
p.copy(child = w.copy(
windowExpressions = w.windowExpressions.filter(p.references.contains)))
// Can't prune the columns on LeafNode
case p @ Project(_, _: LeafNode) => p
case NestedColumnAliasing(p) => p
// for all other logical plans that inherits the output from it's children
// Project over project is handled by the first case, skip it here.
case p @ Project(_, child) if !child.isInstanceOf[Project] =>
val required = child.references ++ p.references
if (!child.inputSet.subsetOf(required)) {
val newChildren = child.children.map(c => prunedChild(c, required))
p.copy(child = child.withNewChildren(newChildren))
} else {
p
}
})
/** Applies a projection only when the child is producing unnecessary attributes */
private def prunedChild(c: LogicalPlan, allReferences: AttributeSet) =
if (!c.outputSet.subsetOf(allReferences)) {
Project(c.output.filter(allReferences.contains), c)
} else {
c
}
/**
* The Project before Filter is not necessary but conflict with PushPredicatesThroughProject,
* so remove it. Since the Projects have been added top-down, we need to remove in bottom-up
* order, otherwise lower Projects can be missed.
*/
private def removeProjectBeforeFilter(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
case p1 @ Project(_, f @ Filter(_, p2 @ Project(_, child)))
if p2.outputSet.subsetOf(child.outputSet) &&
// We only remove attribute-only project.
p2.projectList.forall(_.isInstanceOf[AttributeReference]) =>
p1.copy(child = f.copy(child = child))
}
}
/**
* Combines two [[Project]] operators into one and perform alias substitution,
* merging the expressions into one single expression for the following cases.
* 1. When two [[Project]] operators are adjacent.
* 2. When two [[Project]] operators have LocalLimit/Sample/Repartition operator between them
* and the upper project consists of the same number of columns which is equal or aliasing.
* `GlobalLimit(LocalLimit)` pattern is also considered.
*/
object CollapseProject extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with AliasHelper {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
case p1 @ Project(_, p2: Project) =>
if (haveCommonNonDeterministicOutput(p1.projectList, p2.projectList)) {
p1
} else {
p2.copy(projectList = buildCleanedProjectList(p1.projectList, p2.projectList))
}
case p @ Project(_, agg: Aggregate) =>
if (haveCommonNonDeterministicOutput(p.projectList, agg.aggregateExpressions)) {
p
} else {
agg.copy(aggregateExpressions = buildCleanedProjectList(
p.projectList, agg.aggregateExpressions))
}
case Project(l1, g @ GlobalLimit(_, limit @ LocalLimit(_, p2 @ Project(l2, _))))
if isRenaming(l1, l2) =>
val newProjectList = buildCleanedProjectList(l1, l2)
g.copy(child = limit.copy(child = p2.copy(projectList = newProjectList)))
case Project(l1, limit @ LocalLimit(_, p2 @ Project(l2, _))) if isRenaming(l1, l2) =>
val newProjectList = buildCleanedProjectList(l1, l2)
limit.copy(child = p2.copy(projectList = newProjectList))
case Project(l1, r @ Repartition(_, _, p @ Project(l2, _))) if isRenaming(l1, l2) =>
r.copy(child = p.copy(projectList = buildCleanedProjectList(l1, p.projectList)))
case Project(l1, s @ Sample(_, _, _, _, p2 @ Project(l2, _))) if isRenaming(l1, l2) =>
s.copy(child = p2.copy(projectList = buildCleanedProjectList(l1, p2.projectList)))
}
private def haveCommonNonDeterministicOutput(
upper: Seq[NamedExpression], lower: Seq[NamedExpression]): Boolean = {
val aliases = getAliasMap(lower)
// Collapse upper and lower Projects if and only if their overlapped expressions are all
// deterministic.
upper.exists(_.collect {
case a: Attribute if aliases.contains(a) => aliases(a).child
}.exists(!_.deterministic))
}
private def buildCleanedProjectList(
upper: Seq[NamedExpression],
lower: Seq[NamedExpression]): Seq[NamedExpression] = {
val aliases = getAliasMap(lower)
upper.map(replaceAliasButKeepName(_, aliases))
}
private def isRenaming(list1: Seq[NamedExpression], list2: Seq[NamedExpression]): Boolean = {
list1.length == list2.length && list1.zip(list2).forall {
case (e1, e2) if e1.semanticEquals(e2) => true
case (Alias(a: Attribute, _), b) if a.metadata == Metadata.empty && a.name == b.name => true
case _ => false
}
}
}
/**
* Combines adjacent [[RepartitionOperation]] operators
*/
object CollapseRepartition extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
// Case 1: When a Repartition has a child of Repartition or RepartitionByExpression,
// 1) When the top node does not enable the shuffle (i.e., coalesce API), but the child
// enables the shuffle. Returns the child node if the last numPartitions is bigger;
// otherwise, keep unchanged.
// 2) In the other cases, returns the top node with the child's child
case r @ Repartition(_, _, child: RepartitionOperation) => (r.shuffle, child.shuffle) match {
case (false, true) => if (r.numPartitions >= child.numPartitions) child else r
case _ => r.copy(child = child.child)
}
// Case 2: When a RepartitionByExpression has a child of Repartition or RepartitionByExpression
// we can remove the child.
case r @ RepartitionByExpression(_, child: RepartitionOperation, _) =>
r.copy(child = child.child)
}
}
/**
* Replaces first(col) to nth_value(col, 1) for better performance.
*/
object OptimizeWindowFunctions extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan resolveExpressions {
case we @ WindowExpression(AggregateExpression(first: First, _, _, _, _),
WindowSpecDefinition(_, orderSpec, frameSpecification: SpecifiedWindowFrame))
if orderSpec.nonEmpty && frameSpecification.frameType == RowFrame &&
frameSpecification.lower == UnboundedPreceding &&
(frameSpecification.upper == UnboundedFollowing ||
frameSpecification.upper == CurrentRow) =>
we.copy(windowFunction = NthValue(first.child, Literal(1), first.ignoreNulls))
}
}
/**
* Collapse Adjacent Window Expression.
* - If the partition specs and order specs are the same and the window expression are
* independent and are of the same window function type, collapse into the parent.
*/
object CollapseWindow extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
case w1 @ Window(we1, ps1, os1, w2 @ Window(we2, ps2, os2, grandChild))
if ps1 == ps2 && os1 == os2 && w1.references.intersect(w2.windowOutputSet).isEmpty &&
we1.nonEmpty && we2.nonEmpty &&
// This assumes Window contains the same type of window expressions. This is ensured
// by ExtractWindowFunctions.
WindowFunctionType.functionType(we1.head) == WindowFunctionType.functionType(we2.head) =>
w1.copy(windowExpressions = we2 ++ we1, child = grandChild)
}
}
/**
* Transpose Adjacent Window Expressions.
* - If the partition spec of the parent Window expression is compatible with the partition spec
* of the child window expression, transpose them.
*/
object TransposeWindow extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
private def compatibleParititions(ps1 : Seq[Expression], ps2: Seq[Expression]): Boolean = {
ps1.length < ps2.length && ps2.take(ps1.length).permutations.exists(ps1.zip(_).forall {
case (l, r) => l.semanticEquals(r)
})
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
case w1 @ Window(we1, ps1, os1, w2 @ Window(we2, ps2, os2, grandChild))
if w1.references.intersect(w2.windowOutputSet).isEmpty &&
w1.expressions.forall(_.deterministic) &&
w2.expressions.forall(_.deterministic) &&
compatibleParititions(ps1, ps2) =>
Project(w1.output, Window(we2, ps2, os2, Window(we1, ps1, os1, grandChild)))
}
}
/**
* Infers filters from [[Generate]], such that rows that would have been removed
* by this [[Generate]] can be removed earlier - before joins and in data sources.
*/
object InferFiltersFromGenerate extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
// This rule does not infer filters from foldable expressions to avoid constant filters
// like 'size([1, 2, 3]) > 0'. These do not show up in child's constraints and
// then the idempotence will break.
case generate @ Generate(e, _, _, _, _, _)
if !e.deterministic || e.children.forall(_.foldable) => generate
case generate @ Generate(g, _, false, _, _, _) if canInferFilters(g) =>
// Exclude child's constraints to guarantee idempotency
val inferredFilters = ExpressionSet(
Seq(
GreaterThan(Size(g.children.head), Literal(0)),
IsNotNull(g.children.head)
)
) -- generate.child.constraints
if (inferredFilters.nonEmpty) {
generate.copy(child = Filter(inferredFilters.reduce(And), generate.child))
} else {
generate
}
}
private def canInferFilters(g: Generator): Boolean = g match {
case _: ExplodeBase => true
case _: Inline => true
case _ => false
}
}
/**
* Generate a list of additional filters from an operator's existing constraint but remove those
* that are either already part of the operator's condition or are part of the operator's child
* constraints. These filters are currently inserted to the existing conditions in the Filter
* operators and on either side of Join operators.
*
* Note: While this optimization is applicable to a lot of types of join, it primarily benefits
* Inner and LeftSemi joins.
*/
object InferFiltersFromConstraints extends Rule[LogicalPlan]
with PredicateHelper with ConstraintHelper {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = {
if (SQLConf.get.constraintPropagationEnabled) {
inferFilters(plan)
} else {
plan
}
}
private def inferFilters(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case filter @ Filter(condition, child) =>
val newFilters = filter.constraints --
(child.constraints ++ splitConjunctivePredicates(condition))
if (newFilters.nonEmpty) {
Filter(And(newFilters.reduce(And), condition), child)
} else {
filter
}
case join @ Join(left, right, joinType, conditionOpt, _) =>
joinType match {
// For inner join, we can infer additional filters for both sides. LeftSemi is kind of an
// inner join, it just drops the right side in the final output.
case _: InnerLike | LeftSemi =>
val allConstraints = getAllConstraints(left, right, conditionOpt)
val newLeft = inferNewFilter(left, allConstraints)
val newRight = inferNewFilter(right, allConstraints)
join.copy(left = newLeft, right = newRight)
// For right outer join, we can only infer additional filters for left side.
case RightOuter =>
val allConstraints = getAllConstraints(left, right, conditionOpt)
val newLeft = inferNewFilter(left, allConstraints)
join.copy(left = newLeft)
// For left join, we can only infer additional filters for right side.
case LeftOuter | LeftAnti =>
val allConstraints = getAllConstraints(left, right, conditionOpt)
val newRight = inferNewFilter(right, allConstraints)
join.copy(right = newRight)
case _ => join
}
}
private def getAllConstraints(
left: LogicalPlan,
right: LogicalPlan,
conditionOpt: Option[Expression]): ExpressionSet = {
val baseConstraints = left.constraints.union(right.constraints)
.union(ExpressionSet(conditionOpt.map(splitConjunctivePredicates).getOrElse(Nil)))
baseConstraints.union(inferAdditionalConstraints(baseConstraints))
}
private def inferNewFilter(plan: LogicalPlan, constraints: ExpressionSet): LogicalPlan = {
val newPredicates = constraints
.union(constructIsNotNullConstraints(constraints, plan.output))
.filter { c =>
c.references.nonEmpty && c.references.subsetOf(plan.outputSet) && c.deterministic
} -- plan.constraints
if (newPredicates.isEmpty) {
plan
} else {
Filter(newPredicates.reduce(And), plan)
}
}
}
/**
* Combines all adjacent [[Union]] operators into a single [[Union]].
*/
object CombineUnions extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformDown {
case u: Union => flattenUnion(u, false)
case Distinct(u: Union) => Distinct(flattenUnion(u, true))
}
private def flattenUnion(union: Union, flattenDistinct: Boolean): Union = {
val topByName = union.byName
val topAllowMissingCol = union.allowMissingCol
val stack = mutable.Stack[LogicalPlan](union)
val flattened = mutable.ArrayBuffer.empty[LogicalPlan]
// Note that we should only flatten the unions with same byName and allowMissingCol.
// Although we do `UnionCoercion` at analysis phase, we manually run `CombineUnions`
// in some places like `Dataset.union`. Flattening unions with different resolution
// rules (by position and by name) could cause incorrect results.
while (stack.nonEmpty) {
stack.pop() match {
case Distinct(Union(children, byName, allowMissingCol))
if flattenDistinct && byName == topByName && allowMissingCol == topAllowMissingCol =>
stack.pushAll(children.reverse)
case Union(children, byName, allowMissingCol)
if byName == topByName && allowMissingCol == topAllowMissingCol =>
stack.pushAll(children.reverse)
case child =>
flattened += child
}
}
union.copy(children = flattened.toSeq)
}
}
/**
* Combines two adjacent [[Filter]] operators into one, merging the non-redundant conditions into
* one conjunctive predicate.
*/
object CombineFilters extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform applyLocally
val applyLocally: PartialFunction[LogicalPlan, LogicalPlan] = {
// The query execution/optimization does not guarantee the expressions are evaluated in order.
// We only can combine them if and only if both are deterministic.
case Filter(fc, nf @ Filter(nc, grandChild)) if fc.deterministic && nc.deterministic =>
(ExpressionSet(splitConjunctivePredicates(fc)) --
ExpressionSet(splitConjunctivePredicates(nc))).reduceOption(And) match {
case Some(ac) =>
Filter(And(nc, ac), grandChild)
case None =>
nf
}
}
}
/**
* Removes Sort operations if they don't affect the final output ordering.
* Note that changes in the final output ordering may affect the file size (SPARK-32318).
* This rule handles the following cases:
* 1) if the sort order is empty or the sort order does not have any reference
* 2) if the Sort operator is a local sort and the child is already sorted
* 3) if there is another Sort operator separated by 0...n Project, Filter, Repartition or
* RepartitionByExpression (with deterministic expressions) operators
* 4) if the Sort operator is within Join separated by 0...n Project, Filter, Repartition or
* RepartitionByExpression (with deterministic expressions) operators only and the Join condition
* is deterministic
* 5) if the Sort operator is within GroupBy separated by 0...n Project, Filter, Repartition or
* RepartitionByExpression (with deterministic expressions) operators only and the aggregate
* function is order irrelevant
*/
object EliminateSorts extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform applyLocally
private val applyLocally: PartialFunction[LogicalPlan, LogicalPlan] = {
case s @ Sort(orders, _, child) if orders.isEmpty || orders.exists(_.child.foldable) =>
val newOrders = orders.filterNot(_.child.foldable)
if (newOrders.isEmpty) {
applyLocally.lift(child).getOrElse(child)
} else {
s.copy(order = newOrders)
}
case Sort(orders, false, child) if SortOrder.orderingSatisfies(child.outputOrdering, orders) =>
applyLocally.lift(child).getOrElse(child)
case s @ Sort(_, _, child) => s.copy(child = recursiveRemoveSort(child))
case j @ Join(originLeft, originRight, _, cond, _) if cond.forall(_.deterministic) =>
j.copy(left = recursiveRemoveSort(originLeft), right = recursiveRemoveSort(originRight))
case g @ Aggregate(_, aggs, originChild) if isOrderIrrelevantAggs(aggs) =>
g.copy(child = recursiveRemoveSort(originChild))
}
private def recursiveRemoveSort(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan match {
case Sort(_, _, child) => recursiveRemoveSort(child)
case other if canEliminateSort(other) =>
other.withNewChildren(other.children.map(recursiveRemoveSort))
case _ => plan
}
private def canEliminateSort(plan: LogicalPlan): Boolean = plan match {
case p: Project => p.projectList.forall(_.deterministic)
case f: Filter => f.condition.deterministic
case r: RepartitionByExpression => r.partitionExpressions.forall(_.deterministic)
case _: Repartition => true
case _ => false
}
private def isOrderIrrelevantAggs(aggs: Seq[NamedExpression]): Boolean = {
def isOrderIrrelevantAggFunction(func: AggregateFunction): Boolean = func match {
case _: Min | _: Max | _: Count | _: BitAggregate => true
// Arithmetic operations for floating-point values are order-sensitive
// (they are not associative).
case _: Sum | _: Average | _: CentralMomentAgg =>
!Seq(FloatType, DoubleType).exists(_.sameType(func.children.head.dataType))
case _ => false
}
def checkValidAggregateExpression(expr: Expression): Boolean = expr match {
case _: AttributeReference => true
case ae: AggregateExpression => isOrderIrrelevantAggFunction(ae.aggregateFunction)
case _: UserDefinedExpression => false
case e => e.children.forall(checkValidAggregateExpression)
}
aggs.forall(checkValidAggregateExpression)
}
}
/**
* Removes filters that can be evaluated trivially. This can be done through the following ways:
* 1) by eliding the filter for cases where it will always evaluate to `true`.
* 2) by substituting a dummy empty relation when the filter will always evaluate to `false`.
* 3) by eliminating the always-true conditions given the constraints on the child's output.
*/
object PruneFilters extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
// If the filter condition always evaluate to true, remove the filter.
case Filter(Literal(true, BooleanType), child) => child
// If the filter condition always evaluate to null or false,
// replace the input with an empty relation.
case Filter(Literal(null, _), child) =>
LocalRelation(child.output, data = Seq.empty, isStreaming = plan.isStreaming)
case Filter(Literal(false, BooleanType), child) =>
LocalRelation(child.output, data = Seq.empty, isStreaming = plan.isStreaming)
// If any deterministic condition is guaranteed to be true given the constraints on the child's
// output, remove the condition
case f @ Filter(fc, p: LogicalPlan) =>
val (prunedPredicates, remainingPredicates) =
splitConjunctivePredicates(fc).partition { cond =>
cond.deterministic && p.constraints.contains(cond)
}
if (prunedPredicates.isEmpty) {
f
} else if (remainingPredicates.isEmpty) {
p
} else {
val newCond = remainingPredicates.reduce(And)
Filter(newCond, p)
}
}
}
/**
* The unified version for predicate pushdown of normal operators and joins.
* This rule improves performance of predicate pushdown for cascading joins such as:
* Filter-Join-Join-Join. Most predicates can be pushed down in a single pass.
*/
object PushDownPredicates extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
CombineFilters.applyLocally
.orElse(PushPredicateThroughNonJoin.applyLocally)
.orElse(PushPredicateThroughJoin.applyLocally)
}
}
/**
* Pushes [[Filter]] operators through many operators iff:
* 1) the operator is deterministic
* 2) the predicate is deterministic and the operator will not change any of rows.
*
* This heuristic is valid assuming the expression evaluation cost is minimal.
*/
object PushPredicateThroughNonJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform applyLocally
val applyLocally: PartialFunction[LogicalPlan, LogicalPlan] = {
// SPARK-13473: We can't push the predicate down when the underlying projection output non-
// deterministic field(s). Non-deterministic expressions are essentially stateful. This
// implies that, for a given input row, the output are determined by the expression's initial
// state and all the input rows processed before. In another word, the order of input rows
// matters for non-deterministic expressions, while pushing down predicates changes the order.
// This also applies to Aggregate.
case Filter(condition, project @ Project(fields, grandChild))
if fields.forall(_.deterministic) && canPushThroughCondition(grandChild, condition) =>
val aliasMap = getAliasMap(project)
project.copy(child = Filter(replaceAlias(condition, aliasMap), grandChild))
case filter @ Filter(condition, aggregate: Aggregate)
if aggregate.aggregateExpressions.forall(_.deterministic)
&& aggregate.groupingExpressions.nonEmpty =>
val aliasMap = getAliasMap(aggregate)
// For each filter, expand the alias and check if the filter can be evaluated using
// attributes produced by the aggregate operator's child operator.
val (candidates, nonDeterministic) =
splitConjunctivePredicates(condition).partition(_.deterministic)
val (pushDown, rest) = candidates.partition { cond =>
val replaced = replaceAlias(cond, aliasMap)
cond.references.nonEmpty && replaced.references.subsetOf(aggregate.child.outputSet)
}
val stayUp = rest ++ nonDeterministic
if (pushDown.nonEmpty) {
val pushDownPredicate = pushDown.reduce(And)
val replaced = replaceAlias(pushDownPredicate, aliasMap)
val newAggregate = aggregate.copy(child = Filter(replaced, aggregate.child))
// If there is no more filter to stay up, just eliminate the filter.
// Otherwise, create "Filter(stayUp) <- Aggregate <- Filter(pushDownPredicate)".
if (stayUp.isEmpty) newAggregate else Filter(stayUp.reduce(And), newAggregate)
} else {
filter
}
// Push [[Filter]] operators through [[Window]] operators. Parts of the predicate that can be
// pushed beneath must satisfy the following conditions:
// 1. All the expressions are part of window partitioning key. The expressions can be compound.
// 2. Deterministic.
// 3. Placed before any non-deterministic predicates.
case filter @ Filter(condition, w: Window)
if w.partitionSpec.forall(_.isInstanceOf[AttributeReference]) =>
val partitionAttrs = AttributeSet(w.partitionSpec.flatMap(_.references))
val (candidates, nonDeterministic) =
splitConjunctivePredicates(condition).partition(_.deterministic)
val (pushDown, rest) = candidates.partition { cond =>
cond.references.subsetOf(partitionAttrs)
}
val stayUp = rest ++ nonDeterministic
if (pushDown.nonEmpty) {
val pushDownPredicate = pushDown.reduce(And)
val newWindow = w.copy(child = Filter(pushDownPredicate, w.child))
if (stayUp.isEmpty) newWindow else Filter(stayUp.reduce(And), newWindow)
} else {
filter
}
case filter @ Filter(condition, union: Union) =>
// Union could change the rows, so non-deterministic predicate can't be pushed down
val (pushDown, stayUp) = splitConjunctivePredicates(condition).partition(_.deterministic)
if (pushDown.nonEmpty) {
val pushDownCond = pushDown.reduceLeft(And)
val output = union.output
val newGrandChildren = union.children.map { grandchild =>
val newCond = pushDownCond transform {
case e if output.exists(_.semanticEquals(e)) =>
grandchild.output(output.indexWhere(_.semanticEquals(e)))
}
assert(newCond.references.subsetOf(grandchild.outputSet))
Filter(newCond, grandchild)
}
val newUnion = union.withNewChildren(newGrandChildren)
if (stayUp.nonEmpty) {
Filter(stayUp.reduceLeft(And), newUnion)
} else {
newUnion
}
} else {
filter
}
case filter @ Filter(condition, watermark: EventTimeWatermark) =>
val (pushDown, stayUp) = splitConjunctivePredicates(condition).partition { p =>
p.deterministic && !p.references.contains(watermark.eventTime)
}
if (pushDown.nonEmpty) {
val pushDownPredicate = pushDown.reduceLeft(And)
val newWatermark = watermark.copy(child = Filter(pushDownPredicate, watermark.child))
// If there is no more filter to stay up, just eliminate the filter.
// Otherwise, create "Filter(stayUp) <- watermark <- Filter(pushDownPredicate)".
if (stayUp.isEmpty) newWatermark else Filter(stayUp.reduceLeft(And), newWatermark)
} else {
filter
}
case filter @ Filter(_, u: UnaryNode)
if canPushThrough(u) && u.expressions.forall(_.deterministic) =>
pushDownPredicate(filter, u.child) { predicate =>
u.withNewChildren(Seq(Filter(predicate, u.child)))
}
}
def canPushThrough(p: UnaryNode): Boolean = p match {
// Note that some operators (e.g. project, aggregate, union) are being handled separately
// (earlier in this rule).
case _: AppendColumns => true
case _: Distinct => true
case _: Generate => true
case _: Pivot => true
case _: RepartitionByExpression => true
case _: Repartition => true
case _: ScriptTransformation => true
case _: Sort => true
case _: BatchEvalPython => true
case _: ArrowEvalPython => true
case _: Expand => true
case _ => false
}
private def pushDownPredicate(
filter: Filter,
grandchild: LogicalPlan)(insertFilter: Expression => LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = {
// Only push down the predicates that is deterministic and all the referenced attributes
// come from grandchild.
// TODO: non-deterministic predicates could be pushed through some operators that do not change
// the rows.
val (candidates, nonDeterministic) =
splitConjunctivePredicates(filter.condition).partition(_.deterministic)
val (pushDown, rest) = candidates.partition { cond =>
cond.references.subsetOf(grandchild.outputSet)
}
val stayUp = rest ++ nonDeterministic
if (pushDown.nonEmpty) {
val newChild = insertFilter(pushDown.reduceLeft(And))
if (stayUp.nonEmpty) {
Filter(stayUp.reduceLeft(And), newChild)
} else {
newChild
}
} else {
filter
}
}
/**
* Check if we can safely push a filter through a projection, by making sure that predicate
* subqueries in the condition do not contain the same attributes as the plan they are moved
* into. This can happen when the plan and predicate subquery have the same source.
*/
private def canPushThroughCondition(plan: LogicalPlan, condition: Expression): Boolean = {
val attributes = plan.outputSet
val matched = condition.find {
case s: SubqueryExpression => s.plan.outputSet.intersect(attributes).nonEmpty
case _ => false
}
matched.isEmpty
}
}
/**
* Pushes down [[Filter]] operators where the `condition` can be
* evaluated using only the attributes of the left or right side of a join. Other
* [[Filter]] conditions are moved into the `condition` of the [[Join]].
*
* And also pushes down the join filter, where the `condition` can be evaluated using only the
* attributes of the left or right side of sub query when applicable.
*
* Check https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/OuterJoinBehavior for more details
*/
object PushPredicateThroughJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
/**
* Splits join condition expressions or filter predicates (on a given join's output) into three
* categories based on the attributes required to evaluate them. Note that we explicitly exclude
* non-deterministic (i.e., stateful) condition expressions in canEvaluateInLeft or
* canEvaluateInRight to prevent pushing these predicates on either side of the join.
*
* @return (canEvaluateInLeft, canEvaluateInRight, haveToEvaluateInBoth)
*/
private def split(condition: Seq[Expression], left: LogicalPlan, right: LogicalPlan) = {
val (pushDownCandidates, nonDeterministic) = condition.partition(_.deterministic)
val (leftEvaluateCondition, rest) =
pushDownCandidates.partition(_.references.subsetOf(left.outputSet))
val (rightEvaluateCondition, commonCondition) =
rest.partition(expr => expr.references.subsetOf(right.outputSet))
(leftEvaluateCondition, rightEvaluateCondition, commonCondition ++ nonDeterministic)
}
private def canPushThrough(joinType: JoinType): Boolean = joinType match {
case _: InnerLike | LeftSemi | RightOuter | LeftOuter | LeftAnti | ExistenceJoin(_) => true
case _ => false
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform applyLocally
val applyLocally: PartialFunction[LogicalPlan, LogicalPlan] = {
// push the where condition down into join filter
case f @ Filter(filterCondition, Join(left, right, joinType, joinCondition, hint))
if canPushThrough(joinType) =>
val (leftFilterConditions, rightFilterConditions, commonFilterCondition) =
split(splitConjunctivePredicates(filterCondition), left, right)
joinType match {
case _: InnerLike =>
// push down the single side `where` condition into respective sides
val newLeft = leftFilterConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, left)).getOrElse(left)
val newRight = rightFilterConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, right)).getOrElse(right)
val (newJoinConditions, others) =
commonFilterCondition.partition(canEvaluateWithinJoin)
val newJoinCond = (newJoinConditions ++ joinCondition).reduceLeftOption(And)
val join = Join(newLeft, newRight, joinType, newJoinCond, hint)
if (others.nonEmpty) {
Filter(others.reduceLeft(And), join)
} else {
join
}
case RightOuter =>
// push down the right side only `where` condition
val newLeft = left
val newRight = rightFilterConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, right)).getOrElse(right)
val newJoinCond = joinCondition
val newJoin = Join(newLeft, newRight, RightOuter, newJoinCond, hint)
(leftFilterConditions ++ commonFilterCondition).
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, newJoin)).getOrElse(newJoin)
case LeftOuter | LeftExistence(_) =>
// push down the left side only `where` condition
val newLeft = leftFilterConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, left)).getOrElse(left)
val newRight = right
val newJoinCond = joinCondition
val newJoin = Join(newLeft, newRight, joinType, newJoinCond, hint)
(rightFilterConditions ++ commonFilterCondition).
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, newJoin)).getOrElse(newJoin)
case other =>
throw new IllegalStateException(s"Unexpected join type: $other")
}
// push down the join filter into sub query scanning if applicable
case j @ Join(left, right, joinType, joinCondition, hint) if canPushThrough(joinType) =>
val (leftJoinConditions, rightJoinConditions, commonJoinCondition) =
split(joinCondition.map(splitConjunctivePredicates).getOrElse(Nil), left, right)
joinType match {
case _: InnerLike | LeftSemi =>
// push down the single side only join filter for both sides sub queries
val newLeft = leftJoinConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, left)).getOrElse(left)
val newRight = rightJoinConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, right)).getOrElse(right)
val newJoinCond = commonJoinCondition.reduceLeftOption(And)
Join(newLeft, newRight, joinType, newJoinCond, hint)
case RightOuter =>
// push down the left side only join filter for left side sub query
val newLeft = leftJoinConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, left)).getOrElse(left)
val newRight = right
val newJoinCond = (rightJoinConditions ++ commonJoinCondition).reduceLeftOption(And)
Join(newLeft, newRight, RightOuter, newJoinCond, hint)
case LeftOuter | LeftAnti | ExistenceJoin(_) =>
// push down the right side only join filter for right sub query
val newLeft = left
val newRight = rightJoinConditions.
reduceLeftOption(And).map(Filter(_, right)).getOrElse(right)
val newJoinCond = (leftJoinConditions ++ commonJoinCondition).reduceLeftOption(And)
Join(newLeft, newRight, joinType, newJoinCond, hint)
case other =>
throw new IllegalStateException(s"Unexpected join type: $other")
}
}
}
/**
* This rule optimizes Limit operators by:
* 1. Eliminate [[Limit]] operators if it's child max row <= limit.
* 2. Combines two adjacent [[Limit]] operators into one, merging the
* expressions into one single expression.
*/
object EliminateLimits extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
private def canEliminate(limitExpr: Expression, child: LogicalPlan): Boolean = {
limitExpr.foldable && child.maxRows.exists { _ <= limitExpr.eval().asInstanceOf[Int] }
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformDown {
case Limit(l, child) if canEliminate(l, child) =>
child
case GlobalLimit(le, GlobalLimit(ne, grandChild)) =>
GlobalLimit(Least(Seq(ne, le)), grandChild)
case LocalLimit(le, LocalLimit(ne, grandChild)) =>
LocalLimit(Least(Seq(ne, le)), grandChild)
case Limit(le, Limit(ne, grandChild)) =>
Limit(Least(Seq(ne, le)), grandChild)
}
}
/**
* Check if there any cartesian products between joins of any type in the optimized plan tree.
* Throw an error if a cartesian product is found without an explicit cross join specified.
* This rule is effectively disabled if the CROSS_JOINS_ENABLED flag is true.
*
* This rule must be run AFTER the ReorderJoin rule since the join conditions for each join must be
* collected before checking if it is a cartesian product. If you have
* SELECT * from R, S where R.r = S.s,
* the join between R and S is not a cartesian product and therefore should be allowed.
* The predicate R.r = S.s is not recognized as a join condition until the ReorderJoin rule.
*
* This rule must be run AFTER the batch "LocalRelation", since a join with empty relation should
* not be a cartesian product.
*/
object CheckCartesianProducts extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper {
/**
* Check if a join is a cartesian product. Returns true if
* there are no join conditions involving references from both left and right.
*/
def isCartesianProduct(join: Join): Boolean = {
val conditions = join.condition.map(splitConjunctivePredicates).getOrElse(Nil)
conditions match {
case Seq(Literal.FalseLiteral) | Seq(Literal(null, BooleanType)) => false
case _ => !conditions.map(_.references).exists(refs =>
refs.exists(join.left.outputSet.contains) && refs.exists(join.right.outputSet.contains))
}
}
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan =
if (SQLConf.get.crossJoinEnabled) {
plan
} else plan transform {
case j @ Join(left, right, Inner | LeftOuter | RightOuter | FullOuter, _, _)
if isCartesianProduct(j) =>
throw new AnalysisException(
s"""Detected implicit cartesian product for ${j.joinType.sql} join between logical plans
|${left.treeString(false).trim}
|and
|${right.treeString(false).trim}
|Join condition is missing or trivial.
|Either: use the CROSS JOIN syntax to allow cartesian products between these
|relations, or: enable implicit cartesian products by setting the configuration
|variable spark.sql.crossJoin.enabled=true"""
.stripMargin)
}
}
/**
* Speeds up aggregates on fixed-precision decimals by executing them on unscaled Long values.
*
* This uses the same rules for increasing the precision and scale of the output as
* [[org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.DecimalPrecision]].
*/
object DecimalAggregates extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
import Decimal.MAX_LONG_DIGITS
/** Maximum number of decimal digits representable precisely in a Double */
private val MAX_DOUBLE_DIGITS = 15
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case q: LogicalPlan => q transformExpressionsDown {
case we @ WindowExpression(ae @ AggregateExpression(af, _, _, _, _), _) => af match {
case Sum(e @ DecimalType.Expression(prec, scale)) if prec + 10 <= MAX_LONG_DIGITS =>
MakeDecimal(we.copy(windowFunction = ae.copy(aggregateFunction = Sum(UnscaledValue(e)))),
prec + 10, scale)
case Average(e @ DecimalType.Expression(prec, scale)) if prec + 4 <= MAX_DOUBLE_DIGITS =>
val newAggExpr =
we.copy(windowFunction = ae.copy(aggregateFunction = Average(UnscaledValue(e))))
Cast(
Divide(newAggExpr, Literal.create(math.pow(10.0, scale), DoubleType)),
DecimalType(prec + 4, scale + 4), Option(SQLConf.get.sessionLocalTimeZone))
case _ => we
}
case ae @ AggregateExpression(af, _, _, _, _) => af match {
case Sum(e @ DecimalType.Expression(prec, scale)) if prec + 10 <= MAX_LONG_DIGITS =>
MakeDecimal(ae.copy(aggregateFunction = Sum(UnscaledValue(e))), prec + 10, scale)
case Average(e @ DecimalType.Expression(prec, scale)) if prec + 4 <= MAX_DOUBLE_DIGITS =>
val newAggExpr = ae.copy(aggregateFunction = Average(UnscaledValue(e)))
Cast(
Divide(newAggExpr, Literal.create(math.pow(10.0, scale), DoubleType)),
DecimalType(prec + 4, scale + 4), Option(SQLConf.get.sessionLocalTimeZone))
case _ => ae
}
}
}
}
/**
* Converts local operations (i.e. ones that don't require data exchange) on `LocalRelation` to
* another `LocalRelation`.
*/
object ConvertToLocalRelation extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case Project(projectList, LocalRelation(output, data, isStreaming))
if !projectList.exists(hasUnevaluableExpr) =>
val projection = new InterpretedMutableProjection(projectList, output)
projection.initialize(0)
LocalRelation(projectList.map(_.toAttribute), data.map(projection(_).copy()), isStreaming)
case Limit(IntegerLiteral(limit), LocalRelation(output, data, isStreaming)) =>
LocalRelation(output, data.take(limit), isStreaming)
case Filter(condition, LocalRelation(output, data, isStreaming))
if !hasUnevaluableExpr(condition) =>
val predicate = Predicate.create(condition, output)
predicate.initialize(0)
LocalRelation(output, data.filter(row => predicate.eval(row)), isStreaming)
}
private def hasUnevaluableExpr(expr: Expression): Boolean = {
expr.find(e => e.isInstanceOf[Unevaluable] && !e.isInstanceOf[AttributeReference]).isDefined
}
}
/**
* Replaces logical [[Distinct]] operator with an [[Aggregate]] operator.
* {{{
* SELECT DISTINCT f1, f2 FROM t ==> SELECT f1, f2 FROM t GROUP BY f1, f2
* }}}
*/
object ReplaceDistinctWithAggregate extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case Distinct(child) => Aggregate(child.output, child.output, child)
}
}
/**
* Replaces logical [[Deduplicate]] operator with an [[Aggregate]] operator.
*/
object ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUpWithNewOutput {
case d @ Deduplicate(keys, child) if !child.isStreaming =>
val keyExprIds = keys.map(_.exprId)
val aggCols = child.output.map { attr =>
if (keyExprIds.contains(attr.exprId)) {
attr
} else {
Alias(new First(attr).toAggregateExpression(), attr.name)()
}
}
// SPARK-22951: Physical aggregate operators distinguishes global aggregation and grouping
// aggregations by checking the number of grouping keys. The key difference here is that a
// global aggregation always returns at least one row even if there are no input rows. Here
// we append a literal when the grouping key list is empty so that the result aggregate
// operator is properly treated as a grouping aggregation.
val nonemptyKeys = if (keys.isEmpty) Literal(1) :: Nil else keys
val newAgg = Aggregate(nonemptyKeys, aggCols, child)
val attrMapping = d.output.zip(newAgg.output)
newAgg -> attrMapping
}
}
/**
* Replaces logical [[Intersect]] operator with a left-semi [[Join]] operator.
* {{{
* SELECT a1, a2 FROM Tab1 INTERSECT SELECT b1, b2 FROM Tab2
* ==> SELECT DISTINCT a1, a2 FROM Tab1 LEFT SEMI JOIN Tab2 ON a1<=>b1 AND a2<=>b2
* }}}
*
* Note:
* 1. This rule is only applicable to INTERSECT DISTINCT. Do not use it for INTERSECT ALL.
* 2. This rule has to be done after de-duplicating the attributes; otherwise, the generated
* join conditions will be incorrect.
*/
object ReplaceIntersectWithSemiJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case Intersect(left, right, false) =>
assert(left.output.size == right.output.size)
val joinCond = left.output.zip(right.output).map { case (l, r) => EqualNullSafe(l, r) }
Distinct(Join(left, right, LeftSemi, joinCond.reduceLeftOption(And), JoinHint.NONE))
}
}
/**
* Replaces logical [[Except]] operator with a left-anti [[Join]] operator.
* {{{
* SELECT a1, a2 FROM Tab1 EXCEPT SELECT b1, b2 FROM Tab2
* ==> SELECT DISTINCT a1, a2 FROM Tab1 LEFT ANTI JOIN Tab2 ON a1<=>b1 AND a2<=>b2
* }}}
*
* Note:
* 1. This rule is only applicable to EXCEPT DISTINCT. Do not use it for EXCEPT ALL.
* 2. This rule has to be done after de-duplicating the attributes; otherwise, the generated
* join conditions will be incorrect.
*/
object ReplaceExceptWithAntiJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case Except(left, right, false) =>
assert(left.output.size == right.output.size)
val joinCond = left.output.zip(right.output).map { case (l, r) => EqualNullSafe(l, r) }
Distinct(Join(left, right, LeftAnti, joinCond.reduceLeftOption(And), JoinHint.NONE))
}
}
/**
* Replaces logical [[Except]] operator using a combination of Union, Aggregate
* and Generate operator.
*
* Input Query :
* {{{
* SELECT c1 FROM ut1 EXCEPT ALL SELECT c1 FROM ut2
* }}}
*
* Rewritten Query:
* {{{
* SELECT c1
* FROM (
* SELECT replicate_rows(sum_val, c1)
* FROM (
* SELECT c1, sum_val
* FROM (
* SELECT c1, sum(vcol) AS sum_val
* FROM (
* SELECT 1L as vcol, c1 FROM ut1
* UNION ALL
* SELECT -1L as vcol, c1 FROM ut2
* ) AS union_all
* GROUP BY union_all.c1
* )
* WHERE sum_val > 0
* )
* )
* }}}
*/
object RewriteExceptAll extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case Except(left, right, true) =>
assert(left.output.size == right.output.size)
val newColumnLeft = Alias(Literal(1L), "vcol")()
val newColumnRight = Alias(Literal(-1L), "vcol")()
val modifiedLeftPlan = Project(Seq(newColumnLeft) ++ left.output, left)
val modifiedRightPlan = Project(Seq(newColumnRight) ++ right.output, right)
val unionPlan = Union(modifiedLeftPlan, modifiedRightPlan)
val aggSumCol =
Alias(AggregateExpression(Sum(unionPlan.output.head.toAttribute), Complete, false), "sum")()
val aggOutputColumns = left.output ++ Seq(aggSumCol)
val aggregatePlan = Aggregate(left.output, aggOutputColumns, unionPlan)
val filteredAggPlan = Filter(GreaterThan(aggSumCol.toAttribute, Literal(0L)), aggregatePlan)
val genRowPlan = Generate(
ReplicateRows(Seq(aggSumCol.toAttribute) ++ left.output),
unrequiredChildIndex = Nil,
outer = false,
qualifier = None,
left.output,
filteredAggPlan
)
Project(left.output, genRowPlan)
}
}
/**
* Replaces logical [[Intersect]] operator using a combination of Union, Aggregate
* and Generate operator.
*
* Input Query :
* {{{
* SELECT c1 FROM ut1 INTERSECT ALL SELECT c1 FROM ut2
* }}}
*
* Rewritten Query:
* {{{
* SELECT c1
* FROM (
* SELECT replicate_row(min_count, c1)
* FROM (
* SELECT c1, If (vcol1_cnt > vcol2_cnt, vcol2_cnt, vcol1_cnt) AS min_count
* FROM (
* SELECT c1, count(vcol1) as vcol1_cnt, count(vcol2) as vcol2_cnt
* FROM (
* SELECT true as vcol1, null as , c1 FROM ut1
* UNION ALL
* SELECT null as vcol1, true as vcol2, c1 FROM ut2
* ) AS union_all
* GROUP BY c1
* HAVING vcol1_cnt >= 1 AND vcol2_cnt >= 1
* )
* )
* )
* }}}
*/
object RewriteIntersectAll extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case Intersect(left, right, true) =>
assert(left.output.size == right.output.size)
val trueVcol1 = Alias(Literal(true), "vcol1")()
val nullVcol1 = Alias(Literal(null, BooleanType), "vcol1")()
val trueVcol2 = Alias(Literal(true), "vcol2")()
val nullVcol2 = Alias(Literal(null, BooleanType), "vcol2")()
// Add a projection on the top of left and right plans to project out
// the additional virtual columns.
val leftPlanWithAddedVirtualCols = Project(Seq(trueVcol1, nullVcol2) ++ left.output, left)
val rightPlanWithAddedVirtualCols = Project(Seq(nullVcol1, trueVcol2) ++ right.output, right)
val unionPlan = Union(leftPlanWithAddedVirtualCols, rightPlanWithAddedVirtualCols)
// Expressions to compute count and minimum of both the counts.
val vCol1AggrExpr =
Alias(AggregateExpression(Count(unionPlan.output(0)), Complete, false), "vcol1_count")()
val vCol2AggrExpr =
Alias(AggregateExpression(Count(unionPlan.output(1)), Complete, false), "vcol2_count")()
val ifExpression = Alias(If(
GreaterThan(vCol1AggrExpr.toAttribute, vCol2AggrExpr.toAttribute),
vCol2AggrExpr.toAttribute,
vCol1AggrExpr.toAttribute
), "min_count")()
val aggregatePlan = Aggregate(left.output,
Seq(vCol1AggrExpr, vCol2AggrExpr) ++ left.output, unionPlan)
val filterPlan = Filter(And(GreaterThanOrEqual(vCol1AggrExpr.toAttribute, Literal(1L)),
GreaterThanOrEqual(vCol2AggrExpr.toAttribute, Literal(1L))), aggregatePlan)
val projectMinPlan = Project(left.output ++ Seq(ifExpression), filterPlan)
// Apply the replicator to replicate rows based on min_count
val genRowPlan = Generate(
ReplicateRows(Seq(ifExpression.toAttribute) ++ left.output),
unrequiredChildIndex = Nil,
outer = false,
qualifier = None,
left.output,
projectMinPlan
)
Project(left.output, genRowPlan)
}
}
/**
* Removes literals from group expressions in [[Aggregate]], as they have no effect to the result
* but only makes the grouping key bigger.
*/
object RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case a @ Aggregate(grouping, _, _) if grouping.nonEmpty =>
val newGrouping = grouping.filter(!_.foldable)
if (newGrouping.nonEmpty) {
a.copy(groupingExpressions = newGrouping)
} else {
// All grouping expressions are literals. We should not drop them all, because this can
// change the return semantics when the input of the Aggregate is empty (SPARK-17114). We
// instead replace this by single, easy to hash/sort, literal expression.
a.copy(groupingExpressions = Seq(Literal(0, IntegerType)))
}
}
}
/**
* Removes repetition from group expressions in [[Aggregate]], as they have no effect to the result
* but only makes the grouping key bigger.
*/
object RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case a @ Aggregate(grouping, _, _) if grouping.size > 1 =>
val newGrouping = ExpressionSet(grouping).toSeq
if (newGrouping.size == grouping.size) {
a
} else {
a.copy(groupingExpressions = newGrouping)
}
}
}
/**
* Replaces GlobalLimit 0 and LocalLimit 0 nodes (subtree) with empty Local Relation, as they don't
* return any rows.
*/
object OptimizeLimitZero extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
// returns empty Local Relation corresponding to given plan
private def empty(plan: LogicalPlan) =
LocalRelation(plan.output, data = Seq.empty, isStreaming = plan.isStreaming)
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
// Nodes below GlobalLimit or LocalLimit can be pruned if the limit value is zero (0).
// Any subtree in the logical plan that has GlobalLimit 0 or LocalLimit 0 as its root is
// semantically equivalent to an empty relation.
//
// In such cases, the effects of Limit 0 can be propagated through the Logical Plan by replacing
// the (Global/Local) Limit subtree with an empty LocalRelation, thereby pruning the subtree
// below and triggering other optimization rules of PropagateEmptyRelation to propagate the
// changes up the Logical Plan.
//
// Replace Global Limit 0 nodes with empty Local Relation
case gl @ GlobalLimit(IntegerLiteral(0), _) =>
empty(gl)
// Note: For all SQL queries, if a LocalLimit 0 node exists in the Logical Plan, then a
// GlobalLimit 0 node would also exist. Thus, the above case would be sufficient to handle
// almost all cases. However, if a user explicitly creates a Logical Plan with LocalLimit 0 node
// then the following rule will handle that case as well.
//
// Replace Local Limit 0 nodes with empty Local Relation
case ll @ LocalLimit(IntegerLiteral(0), _) =>
empty(ll)
}
}
© 2015 - 2025 Weber Informatics LLC | Privacy Policy