commonMain.org.antlr.v4.kotlinruntime.dfa.DFAState.kt Maven / Gradle / Ivy
/*
* Copyright (c) 2012-2017 The ANTLR Project. All rights reserved.
* Use of this file is governed by the BSD 3-clause license that
* can be found in the LICENSE.txt file in the project root.
*/
package org.antlr.v4.kotlinruntime.dfa
import org.antlr.v4.kotlinruntime.Token
import org.antlr.v4.kotlinruntime.atn.*
import org.antlr.v4.kotlinruntime.misc.MurmurHash
/** A DFA state represents a set of possible ATN configurations.
* As Aho, Sethi, Ullman p. 117 says "The DFA uses its state
* to keep track of all possible states the ATN can be in after
* reading each input symbol. That is to say, after reading
* input a1a2..an, the DFA is in a state that represents the
* subset T of the states of the ATN that are reachable from the
* ATN's start state along some path labeled a1a2..an."
* In conventional NFADFA conversion, therefore, the subset T
* would be a bitset representing the set of states the
* ATN could be in. We need to track the alt predicted by each
* state as well, however. More importantly, we need to maintain
* a stack of states, tracking the closure operations as they
* jump from rule to rule, emulating rule invocations (method calls).
* I have to add a stack to simulate the proper lookahead sequences for
* the underlying LL grammar from which the ATN was derived.
*
*
* I use a set of ATNConfig objects not simple states. An ATNConfig
* is both a state (ala normal conversion) and a RuleContext describing
* the chain of rules (if any) followed to arrive at that state.
*
*
* A DFA state may have multiple references to a particular state,
* but with different ATN contexts (with same or different alts)
* meaning that state was reached via a different set of rule invocations.
*/
class DFAState {
var stateNumber = -1
var configs: ATNConfigSet? = ATNConfigSet()
/** `edges[symbol]` points to target of symbol. Shift up by 1 so (-1)
* [Token.EOF] maps to `edges[0]`.
*/
var edges: Array? = null
var isAcceptState = false
/** if accept state, what ttype do we match or alt do we predict?
* This is set to [ATN.INVALID_ALT_NUMBER] when [.predicates]`!=null` or
* [.requiresFullContext].
*/
var prediction: Int = 0
var lexerActionExecutor: LexerActionExecutor? = null
/**
* Indicates that this state was created during SLL prediction that
* discovered a conflict between the configurations in the state. Future
* [ParserATNSimulator.execATN] invocations immediately jumped doing
* full context prediction if this field is true.
*/
var requiresFullContext: Boolean = false
/** During SLL parsing, this is a list of predicates associated with the
* ATN configurations of the DFA state. When we have predicates,
* [.requiresFullContext] is `false` since full context prediction evaluates predicates
* on-the-fly. If this is not null, then [.prediction] is
* [ATN.INVALID_ALT_NUMBER].
*
*
* We only use these for non-[.requiresFullContext] but conflicting states. That
* means we know from the context (it's $ or we don't dip into outer
* context) that it's an ambiguity not a conflict.
*
*
* This list is computed by [ParserATNSimulator.predicateDFAState].
*/
var predicates: Array? = null
/** Get the set of all alts mentioned by all ATN configurations in this
* DFA state.
*/
val altSet: Set?
get() {
val alts = HashSet()
if (configs != null) {
for (c in configs!!) {
alts.add(c.alt)
}
}
return if (alts.isEmpty()) null else alts
}
/** Map a predicate to a predicted alternative. */
class PredPrediction(var pred: SemanticContext // never null; at least SemanticContext.NONE
, var alt: Int) {
override fun toString(): String {
return "($pred, $alt)"
}
}
constructor() {}
constructor(stateNumber: Int) {
this.stateNumber = stateNumber
}
constructor(configs: ATNConfigSet) {
this.configs = configs
}
override fun hashCode(): Int {
var hash = MurmurHash.initialize(7)
hash = MurmurHash.update(hash, configs!!.hashCode())
hash = MurmurHash.finish(hash, 1)
return hash
}
/**
* Two [DFAState] instances are equal if their ATN configuration sets
* are the same. This method is used to see if a state already exists.
*
*
* Because the number of alternatives and number of ATN configurations are
* finite, there is a finite number of DFA states that can be processed.
* This is necessary to show that the algorithm terminates.
*
*
* Cannot test the DFA state numbers here because in
* [ParserATNSimulator.addDFAState] we need to know if any other state
* exists that has this exact set of ATN configurations. The
* [.stateNumber] is irrelevant.
*/
override fun equals(o: Any?): Boolean {
// compare set of ATN configurations in this set with other
if (this === o) return true
if (o !is DFAState) {
return false
}
val other = o as DFAState?
// TODO (sam): what to do when configs==null?
// System.out.println("DFAState.equals: "+configs+(sameSet?"==":"!=")+other.configs);
return configs!! == other!!.configs
}
override fun toString(): String {
val buf = StringBuilder()
buf.append(stateNumber).append(":").append(configs)
if (isAcceptState) {
buf.append("=>")
if (predicates != null) {
buf.append(predicates!!.joinToString())
} else {
buf.append(prediction)
}
}
return buf.toString()
}
}