com.google.common.testing.RelationshipTester Maven / Gradle / Ivy
Go to download
Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of guava-testlib Show documentation
Show all versions of guava-testlib Show documentation
Guava testlib is a set of java classes used for more convenient
unit testing - particularly to assist the tests for Guava itself.
The newest version!
/*
* Copyright (C) 2011 The Guava Authors
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package com.google.common.testing;
import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Equivalence;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;
import java.util.List;
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
/**
* Implementation helper for {@link EqualsTester} and {@link EquivalenceTester} that tests for
* equivalence classes.
*
* @author Gregory Kick
*/
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
final class RelationshipTester {
static class ItemReporter {
String reportItem(Item> item) {
return item.toString();
}
}
/**
* A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
* identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
* include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
* there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
* directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
*/
private final Equivalence super T> equivalence;
private final String relationshipName;
private final String hashName;
private final ItemReporter itemReporter;
private final List> groups = Lists.newArrayList();
RelationshipTester(
Equivalence super T> equivalence,
String relationshipName,
String hashName,
ItemReporter itemReporter) {
this.equivalence = checkNotNull(equivalence);
this.relationshipName = checkNotNull(relationshipName);
this.hashName = checkNotNull(hashName);
this.itemReporter = checkNotNull(itemReporter);
}
// TODO(cpovirk): should we reject null items, since the tests already check null automatically?
@CanIgnoreReturnValue
public RelationshipTester addRelatedGroup(Iterable extends T> group) {
groups.add(ImmutableList.copyOf(group));
return this;
}
public void test() {
for (int groupNumber = 0; groupNumber < groups.size(); groupNumber++) {
ImmutableList group = groups.get(groupNumber);
for (int itemNumber = 0; itemNumber < group.size(); itemNumber++) {
// check related items in same group
for (int relatedItemNumber = 0; relatedItemNumber < group.size(); relatedItemNumber++) {
if (itemNumber != relatedItemNumber) {
assertRelated(groupNumber, itemNumber, relatedItemNumber);
}
}
// check unrelated items in all other groups
for (int unrelatedGroupNumber = 0;
unrelatedGroupNumber < groups.size();
unrelatedGroupNumber++) {
if (groupNumber != unrelatedGroupNumber) {
ImmutableList unrelatedGroup = groups.get(unrelatedGroupNumber);
for (int unrelatedItemNumber = 0;
unrelatedItemNumber < unrelatedGroup.size();
unrelatedItemNumber++) {
assertUnrelated(groupNumber, itemNumber, unrelatedGroupNumber, unrelatedItemNumber);
}
}
}
}
}
}
private void assertRelated(int groupNumber, int itemNumber, int relatedItemNumber) {
Item itemInfo = getItem(groupNumber, itemNumber);
Item relatedInfo = getItem(groupNumber, relatedItemNumber);
T item = itemInfo.value;
T related = relatedInfo.value;
assertWithTemplate(
"$ITEM must be $RELATIONSHIP to $OTHER",
itemInfo,
relatedInfo,
equivalence.equivalent(item, related));
int itemHash = equivalence.hash(item);
int relatedHash = equivalence.hash(related);
assertWithTemplate(
"the $HASH ("
+ itemHash
+ ") of $ITEM must be equal to the $HASH ("
+ relatedHash
+ ") of $OTHER",
itemInfo,
relatedInfo,
itemHash == relatedHash);
}
private void assertUnrelated(
int groupNumber, int itemNumber, int unrelatedGroupNumber, int unrelatedItemNumber) {
Item itemInfo = getItem(groupNumber, itemNumber);
Item unrelatedInfo = getItem(unrelatedGroupNumber, unrelatedItemNumber);
assertWithTemplate(
"$ITEM must not be $RELATIONSHIP to $OTHER",
itemInfo,
unrelatedInfo,
!equivalence.equivalent(itemInfo.value, unrelatedInfo.value));
}
private void assertWithTemplate(String template, Item item, Item other, boolean condition) {
if (!condition) {
throw new AssertionFailedError(
template
.replace("$RELATIONSHIP", relationshipName)
.replace("$HASH", hashName)
.replace("$ITEM", itemReporter.reportItem(item))
.replace("$OTHER", itemReporter.reportItem(other)));
}
}
private Item getItem(int groupNumber, int itemNumber) {
return new Item<>(groups.get(groupNumber).get(itemNumber), groupNumber, itemNumber);
}
static final class Item {
final T value;
final int groupNumber;
final int itemNumber;
Item(T value, int groupNumber, int itemNumber) {
this.value = value;
this.groupNumber = groupNumber;
this.itemNumber = itemNumber;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return value + " [group " + (groupNumber + 1) + ", item " + (itemNumber + 1) + ']';
}
}
}