com.pulumi.kubernetes.policy.v1.inputs.PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs Maven / Gradle / Ivy
Go to download
Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of kubernetes Show documentation
Show all versions of kubernetes Show documentation
A Pulumi package for creating and managing Kubernetes resources.
// *** WARNING: this file was generated by pulumi-java-gen. ***
// *** Do not edit by hand unless you're certain you know what you are doing! ***
package com.pulumi.kubernetes.policy.v1.inputs;
import com.pulumi.core.Either;
import com.pulumi.core.Output;
import com.pulumi.core.annotations.Import;
import com.pulumi.kubernetes.meta.v1.inputs.LabelSelectorArgs;
import java.lang.Integer;
import java.lang.String;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.Optional;
import javax.annotation.Nullable;
/**
* PodDisruptionBudgetSpec is a description of a PodDisruptionBudget.
*
*/
public final class PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs extends com.pulumi.resources.ResourceArgs {
public static final PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs Empty = new PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs();
/**
* An eviction is allowed if at most "maxUnavailable" pods selected by "selector" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with "minAvailable".
*
*/
@Import(name="maxUnavailable")
private @Nullable Output> maxUnavailable;
/**
* @return An eviction is allowed if at most "maxUnavailable" pods selected by "selector" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with "minAvailable".
*
*/
public Optional>> maxUnavailable() {
return Optional.ofNullable(this.maxUnavailable);
}
/**
* An eviction is allowed if at least "minAvailable" pods selected by "selector" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod. So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying "100%".
*
*/
@Import(name="minAvailable")
private @Nullable Output> minAvailable;
/**
* @return An eviction is allowed if at least "minAvailable" pods selected by "selector" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod. So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying "100%".
*
*/
public Optional>> minAvailable() {
return Optional.ofNullable(this.minAvailable);
}
/**
* Label query over pods whose evictions are managed by the disruption budget. A null selector will match no pods, while an empty ({}) selector will select all pods within the namespace.
*
*/
@Import(name="selector")
private @Nullable Output selector;
/**
* @return Label query over pods whose evictions are managed by the disruption budget. A null selector will match no pods, while an empty ({}) selector will select all pods within the namespace.
*
*/
public Optional> selector() {
return Optional.ofNullable(this.selector);
}
/**
* UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type="Ready",status="True".
*
* Valid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.
*
* IfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* AlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* Additional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
*
* This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
*
*/
@Import(name="unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy")
private @Nullable Output unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy;
/**
* @return UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type="Ready",status="True".
*
* Valid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.
*
* IfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* AlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* Additional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
*
* This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
*
*/
public Optional> unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy() {
return Optional.ofNullable(this.unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy);
}
private PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs() {}
private PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs(PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs $) {
this.maxUnavailable = $.maxUnavailable;
this.minAvailable = $.minAvailable;
this.selector = $.selector;
this.unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = $.unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy;
}
public static Builder builder() {
return new Builder();
}
public static Builder builder(PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs defaults) {
return new Builder(defaults);
}
public static final class Builder {
private PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs $;
public Builder() {
$ = new PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs();
}
public Builder(PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs defaults) {
$ = new PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs(Objects.requireNonNull(defaults));
}
/**
* @param maxUnavailable An eviction is allowed if at most "maxUnavailable" pods selected by "selector" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with "minAvailable".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder maxUnavailable(@Nullable Output> maxUnavailable) {
$.maxUnavailable = maxUnavailable;
return this;
}
/**
* @param maxUnavailable An eviction is allowed if at most "maxUnavailable" pods selected by "selector" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with "minAvailable".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder maxUnavailable(Either maxUnavailable) {
return maxUnavailable(Output.of(maxUnavailable));
}
/**
* @param maxUnavailable An eviction is allowed if at most "maxUnavailable" pods selected by "selector" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with "minAvailable".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder maxUnavailable(Integer maxUnavailable) {
return maxUnavailable(Either.ofLeft(maxUnavailable));
}
/**
* @param maxUnavailable An eviction is allowed if at most "maxUnavailable" pods selected by "selector" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with "minAvailable".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder maxUnavailable(String maxUnavailable) {
return maxUnavailable(Either.ofRight(maxUnavailable));
}
/**
* @param minAvailable An eviction is allowed if at least "minAvailable" pods selected by "selector" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod. So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying "100%".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder minAvailable(@Nullable Output> minAvailable) {
$.minAvailable = minAvailable;
return this;
}
/**
* @param minAvailable An eviction is allowed if at least "minAvailable" pods selected by "selector" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod. So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying "100%".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder minAvailable(Either minAvailable) {
return minAvailable(Output.of(minAvailable));
}
/**
* @param minAvailable An eviction is allowed if at least "minAvailable" pods selected by "selector" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod. So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying "100%".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder minAvailable(Integer minAvailable) {
return minAvailable(Either.ofLeft(minAvailable));
}
/**
* @param minAvailable An eviction is allowed if at least "minAvailable" pods selected by "selector" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod. So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying "100%".
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder minAvailable(String minAvailable) {
return minAvailable(Either.ofRight(minAvailable));
}
/**
* @param selector Label query over pods whose evictions are managed by the disruption budget. A null selector will match no pods, while an empty ({}) selector will select all pods within the namespace.
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder selector(@Nullable Output selector) {
$.selector = selector;
return this;
}
/**
* @param selector Label query over pods whose evictions are managed by the disruption budget. A null selector will match no pods, while an empty ({}) selector will select all pods within the namespace.
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder selector(LabelSelectorArgs selector) {
return selector(Output.of(selector));
}
/**
* @param unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type="Ready",status="True".
*
* Valid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.
*
* IfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* AlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* Additional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
*
* This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(@Nullable Output unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy) {
$.unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy;
return this;
}
/**
* @param unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type="Ready",status="True".
*
* Valid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.
*
* IfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* AlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase="Running"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.
*
* Additional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
*
* This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
*
* @return builder
*
*/
public Builder unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(String unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy) {
return unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(Output.of(unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy));
}
public PodDisruptionBudgetSpecArgs build() {
return $;
}
}
}
© 2015 - 2025 Weber Informatics LLC | Privacy Policy