file.newsgroup.cars.102838 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Christian Huebner)
Subject: Re: Manual Shift Bigots
In rec.autos you write:
>if ayrton senna can drive a racecar with fully automatic transmission,
>it can't be half bad.. :-)
This McLaren auto-transmission (I still think it's only half auto,
but You may be right) has NOTHING to do with Your GM, Chrysler, Volvo,
or whatever auto transmission. It's a normal manual transmission
gearbox with clutch and all, but there are servo motors, which do
the shifting.
That means, there is no power loss in the drivetrain (if You take out
minimal mechanical friction), and the sami-auto transmissions
(Ferrari, Williams, McLaren(?),...) don't tell You, when to shift,
either. However, these transmissions share an important disadvantage
with Your stock auto-trannie: They are EXPENSIVE.
As long as these servo-shifted gearboxes aren't available on
'normal' cars I'm gonna stick with my manual. I just can't see an
advantage to make up for two grand I lose in this deal and the
loss in mileage and power (except maybe in real heavy traffic). But
then I drive mostly on the autobahn and country roads anyway.
There's no point in making a religion out of this, I just wanted to
point out a few technical facts and MY OWN opinion, so there's
no need for a flame war.
>eliot
Have a safe ride
Chris