file.newsgroup.cars.103520 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Jim Chott)
Subject: Re: Re: Toyota Land Cruiser worth it?
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
(Paul Hovnanian) wrote:
>
> Based on my experience with a '79 FJ40 ( the hard-top jeep-style model ) I
> would definitely give a new model consideration if I were in the market. The
> older models are VERY well built. Unless Toyota lost its mind, I would
> assume, until proven otherwise, that the newer models have inherited some
> if not all of the qualities of their ancestors.
>
> Two major differences in the running gear (that I'm aware of) need study.
> My '79 has a solid front axle housing whereas the newer models have
> independant front suspension. The solid axle is theoretically stronger and
The new Cruisers DO NOT have independent suspension in the front. They
still
run a straight axle, but with coils. The 4Runner is the one with
independent
front. The Cruisers have incredible wheel travel with this system.
> more reliable than the newer model, but only experience will tell. The
> independant front suspension is, no doubt, a compromise made to satisfy
> the typical user, who will never need a real utility vehicle. The second
> difference is the type of transfer case used on the newer models. I'm
> not sure, but I think Tioyota went to a full-time 4WD or all-wheel drive
> system. The older Landcruisers have a "lock-up" type. Both have their
> advantages and disadvantages.
>
The 91-up Cruiser does have full time 4WD, but the center diff locks in
low range. My brother has a 91 and is an incredibly sturdy vehicle which
has done all the 4+ trails in Moab without a tow. The 93 and later is even
better with the bigger engine and locking diffs.
Jim Chott 85 Toyota 4WD pickup
[email protected] 72 LeMans Sport Convertible
Tempe, Arizona