file.newsgroup.med.59216 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (David Rind)
Subject: Re: Candida(yeast) Bloom, Fact or Fiction
In article <[email protected]>
[email protected] writes:
>poster for being treated by a liscenced physician for a disease that did
>not exist. Calling this physician a quack was reprehensible Steve and I
>see that you and some of the others are doing it here as well.
Do you believe that any quacks exist? How about quack diagnoses? Is
being a "licensed physician" enough to guarantee that someone is not
a quack, or is it just that even if a licensed physician is a quack,
other people shouldn't say so? Can you give an example of a
commonly diagnosed ailment that you think is a quack diagnosis,
or have we gotten to the point in civilization where we no longer
need to worry about unscrupulous "healers" taking advantage of
people.
--
David Rind
[email protected]