org.apache.calcite.linq4j.Extensions Maven / Gradle / Ivy
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.apache.calcite.linq4j;
import org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function2;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
/**
* Contains what, in LINQ.NET, would be extension methods.
*
* Notes on mapping from LINQ.NET to Java
*
* We have preserved most of the API. But we've changed a few things, so that
* the API is more typical Java API:
*
*
*
* - Java method names start with a lower-case letter.
*
* - A few methods became keywords when their first letter was converted
* to lower case; hence
* {@link org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.Expressions#break_}
*
* - We created a Java interface {@link Enumerable}, similar to LINQ.NET's
* IEnumerable. IEnumerable is built into C#, and that gives it
* advantages: the standard collections implement it, and you can use
* any IEnumerable in a foreach loop. We made the Java
* {@code Enumerable} extend {@link Iterable},
* so that it can be used in for-each loops. But the standard
* collections still don't implement it. A few methods that take an
* IEnumerable in LINQ.NET take an Iterable in LINQ4J.
*
* - LINQ.NET's Dictionary interface maps to Map in Java;
* hence, the LINQ.NET {@code ToDictionary} methods become
* {@code toMap}.
*
* - LINQ.NET's decimal type changes to BigDecimal. (A little bit unnatural,
* since decimal is primitive and BigDecimal is not.)
*
* - There is no Nullable in Java. Therefore we distinguish between methods
* that return, say, Long (which may be null) and long. See for example
* {@link org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.NullableLongFunction1} and
* {@link org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.LongFunction1}, and the
* variants of {@link Enumerable#sum} that call them.
*
*
- Java erases type parameters from argument types before resolving
* overloading. Therefore similar methods have the same erasure. Methods
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#averageDouble averageDouble},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#averageInteger averageInteger},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#groupByK groupByK},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#selectN selectN},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#selectManyN selectManyN},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#skipWhileN skipWhileN},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#sumBigDecimal sumBigDecimal},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#sumNullableBigDecimal sumNullableBigDecimal},
* {@link ExtendedQueryable#whereN whereN}
* have been renamed from {@code average}, {@code groupBy}, {@code max},
* {@code min}, {@code select}, {@code selectMany}, {@code skipWhile} and
* {@code where} to prevent ambiguity.
*
* - .NET allows extension methods — static methods that then
* become, via compiler magic, a method of any object whose type is the
* same as the first parameter of the extension method. In LINQ.NET, the
* {@code IQueryable} and {@code IEnumerable} interfaces have many such methods.
* In Java, those methods need to be explicitly added to the interface, and will
* need to be implemented by every class that implements that interface.
* We can help by implementing the methods as static methods, and by
* providing an abstract base class that implements the extension methods
* in the interface. Hence {@link AbstractEnumerable} and
* {@link AbstractQueryable} call methods in {@link Extensions}.
*
* - .NET Func becomes {@link org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function0},
* {@link org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function1},
* {@link org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function2}, depending
* on the number of arguments to the function, because Java types cannot be
* overloaded based on the number of type parameters.
*
* - Types map as follows:
* {@code Int32} → {@code int} or {@link Integer},
* {@code Int64} → {@code long} or {@link Long},
* {@code bool} → {@code boolean} or {@link Boolean},
* {@code Dictionary} → {@link Map},
* {@code Lookup} → {@link Map} whose value type is an {@link Iterable},
*
*
* - Function types that accept primitive types in LINQ.NET have become
* boxed types in LINQ4J. For example, a predicate function
* {@code Func
} becomes {@code Func1}.
* It would be wrong to infer that the function is allowed to return null.
*
*
*/
public abstract class Extensions {
private Extensions() {}
static final Function2 BIG_DECIMAL_SUM =
BigDecimal::add;
static final Function2 FLOAT_SUM =
(v1, v2) -> v1 + v2;
static final Function2 DOUBLE_SUM =
(v1, v2) -> v1 + v2;
static final Function2 INTEGER_SUM =
(v1, v2) -> v1 + v2;
static final Function2 LONG_SUM =
(v1, v2) -> v1 + v2;
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static final Function2 COMPARABLE_MIN =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) > 0 ? v2 : v1;
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static final Function2 COMPARABLE_MAX =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) < 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 FLOAT_MIN =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) > 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 FLOAT_MAX =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) < 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 DOUBLE_MIN =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) > 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 DOUBLE_MAX =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) < 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 INTEGER_MIN =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) > 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 INTEGER_MAX =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) < 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 LONG_MIN =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) > 0 ? v2 : v1;
static final Function2 LONG_MAX =
(v1, v2) -> v1 == null || v1.compareTo(v2) < 0 ? v2 : v1;
// flags a piece of code we're yet to implement
public static RuntimeException todo() {
return new RuntimeException();
}
public static Queryable asQueryable(DefaultEnumerable source) {
//noinspection unchecked
return source instanceof Queryable
? ((Queryable) source)
: new EnumerableQueryable(
Linq4j.DEFAULT_PROVIDER, (Class) Object.class, null, source);
}
static > Comparator comparableComparator() {
return Comparable::compareTo;
}
}