data.3news-bydate.test.rec.motorcycles.104405 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Jerry Bowman)
Subject: Re: Should liability insurance be required?
Nntp-Posting-Host: fred.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado Boulder, OCS
Lines: 24
In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (Wm. L. Ranck) writes:
>Dan J. Declerck ([email protected]) wrote:
>: In states with No-fault auto-insurance, this applies. You basically insure your
>: own vehicle, and the max you can sue for is about $400 (In MI, anyway).
>: The point to be made with no-fault, is the fact that it removes the lawyers from the
>: system, and lets people get their money faster. The removal of lawyers, reduces the
>: clogs on court system, and thus, reduces government burdens, by not requiring so
>: many judges.
>
>: does it work?? I don't know, ask the people of Michigan....
>
>No, ask the people of New Jersey where the "no-fault" hoax has been
>going on for years. Last I heard every state that ever got no-fault
>insurance saw an increase in rates. I know that's what happened in
>NJ because I lived there when it changed. Just one more reason I will
>never go back to that state.
>--
>*******************************************************************************
>* Bill Ranck (703) 231-9503 [email protected] *
>* Computing Center, Virginia Polytchnic Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, Va. *
>*******************************************************************************
In Colorado my agent tells me that no fault only applies to
the medical coverage.