data.3news-bydate.test.rec.sport.baseball.104318 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Lyford Beverage)
Subject: Re: Notes on Jays vs. Indians Series
Distribution: na
Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 22
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Edward [Ted] Fischer) writes:
|> In article [email protected] (Rudy Wade) writes:
|> >In article [email protected] (Gord Niguma) writes:
|> >>reference to history because he certainly didn't have the best season for
|> >>second basemen in history. He probably didn't even have as good a season as
|> >>Alomar last year.
|> >
|> >What? Do you have some measure (like popularity in Toronto doesn't count)
|> >that you are basing this statement on?
|>
|> Uh, yes. Baerga has a lot of flash, but Alomar was the better hitter
|> last year.
|>
|> BATTERS BA SLG OBP G AB R H TB 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS E
|> BAERGA,C .312 .455 .354 161 657 92 205 299 32 1 20 105 35 76 10 2 19
|> ALOMAR,R .310 .427 .405 152 571 105 177 244 27 8 8 76 87 52 49 9 5
|>
This is fascinating. You say that Alomar was the better hitter last
year, and immediately follow that up with numbers showing that Baerga
had a better year. The only category that I see which shows an advantage
for Alomar is OBP.