data.3news-bydate.test.rec.sport.baseball.104406 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Ted Frank)
Subject: Ozzie Smith a Defensive Liability?
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 18
In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (Brett Rogers) writes:
>In article [email protected] (Dale Stephenson) writes:
>>>Smith, Ozzie .742 .717 .697 .672 .664 0.701
>> The Wizard's 1988 is the second highest year ever. Still very good,
>>but I don't like the way his numbers have declined every year. In a few
>>years may be a defensive liability.
>
>That's rich... Ozzie Smith a defensive liability...
Why? Do you expect him to remain the best shortstop in the game until
he reaches his seventy-third birthday, or something? Why is it such a
strange concept that a forty-one-year-old Ozzie Smith might be a defensive
liability in 1996?
--
ted frank |
[email protected] | I'm sorry, the card says "Moops."
the u of c law school |
standard disclaimers |