data.3news-bydate.test.rec.sport.baseball.104919 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Dale Stephenson)
Subject: Re: Defensive Averages 1988-1992, Third Base
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Lines: 64
In [email protected] (Craig Stelter) writes:
>Dale Stephenson ([email protected]) wrote:
>: In [email protected] (Dale Stephenson) writes:
>: >Compiled from the last five Defensive Average reports, here are the career
>: >DAs for the individual players in the reports. Stats are courtesy of
>: >Sherri Nichols. Players are listed in descending order.
>: And some comments, with some players deleted.
>: >Third Basemen
>: >-------------
>: >Leius, Scott ---- ---- ---- .653 .680 0.672
>: Looks good. Too bad he's moving to short.
>: >Pagliarulo, Mike .631 ---- .575 .744 ---- 0.649
>: This is an interesting line. His 1988 figure was slightly below average.
>: His 1990 was pathetic, and his 1991 was the next best year by anybody. Part of
>: that may be his mobility. 1988 was with the Yankees. 1990 was with the
>: Padres, who appear to have a rotten infield. 1991 was with the Twins, and
>: judging by Leius and Gaetti, the Metrodome may be a good place to play
>: third.
>Gaetti, Gary .616 .638 .655 .632 ---- 0.637
>Apologies if I don't know what I'm talking about :-), but as a Twins fan,
>I like to think they have good players in any park. Not sure if I remember
>completely or not, but I think Gaetti played with the Twins in '87 for the
>world series, and again in '88 (note that's his lowest of the 4). I believe
>the next 3 (or at least the last two) were played with the Angels.
Actually, Gaetti's first year with California was 1991. His .632 DA wasn't
out of line with his career averages, and his .616 was actually below average
in 1988. But check out the last three years at the Metrodome.
1990
Gaetti .655
AL Avg .604
1991
Pags .744
Leius .653
Al Avg .620
1992
Leius .680
AL Avg .603
For the last three years, the highest DAs in either league have been posted
by Minnesota players -- three different ones, including one (Pags) who was
mediocre to horrible elsewhere. That doesn't *prove* a park effect is at
work, any more than San Diego's horrible infield numbers prove a park effect
is at work. But it looks like a strong possibility to me.
Lots
>of factors make a player excell... I hate it when so many use the dome.
>It may not be ideal, but nice to comfortably enjoy baseball and football
>even when it's snowing and raining.
And it might even be a nice play to thrid base.
--
Dale J. Stephenson |*| ([email protected]) |*| Baseball fanatic
"It is considered good to look wise, especially when not
overburdened with information" -- J. Golden Kimball