data.3news-bydate.test.rec.sport.hockey.53707 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Eric Molas)
Subject: Re: Playoff predictions
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Lines: 53
NNTP-Posting-Host: uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
>1st round:
>----------
>PITT vs NYI: PITT in 4.
>WASH vs NJD: WASH in 6.
>BOS vs BUF: BOS in 5.
>QUE vs MON: MON in 7.
I'd have to take Quebec in 6.
>CHI vs STL: CHI in 4.
Hawks will win, but it will take 5.
>DET vs TOR: DET in 6.
>VAN vs WIN: WIN in 6.
>CAL vs LA: CAL in 5.
Cal in 7.
>2nd round:
>----------
>PITT vs WASH: PITT in 4.
>BOS vs MON: BOS in 6.
Boston will beat Quebec in 6.
>CHI vs DET: CHI in 7.
>WIN vs CAL: CAL in 5.
>3rd round:
>----------
>PITT vs BOS: PITT in 5.
Pitt in 6. The Bruins arent a pushover.
>CHI vs CAL: CHI in 5.
The hawks havent had problems with them all year. Yep, I agree.
>Finals:
>------
>PITT vs CHI: PITT in 5.
Unless the Hawks can somehow change fate, you're right.
Who knows, though. Maybe some intensive forechecking aka normal Hawks
style will nullify a seemingly unbeatable team. Maybe the Pens are due
for a let-down. Hell, how could they _possibly_ extend their record
making play all the way through the playoffs.?
>=============================================
>Walter
--
//Damien Endemyr the Unpure Knight of Doom //
//"So I've acquired a taste for blood and have adopted a nocturnal //
//lifestyle. That Doesnt mean I'm a vampire....." //