data.3news-bydate.train.rec.sport.baseball.105047 Maven / Gradle / Ivy
From: [email protected] (Scott Barman)
Subject: Re: Darrrrrrrrryl
Organization: American Software Development Corp., West Babylon, NY
Lines: 37
In article [email protected] (Mark Singer) writes:
>That exuberance disappeared immediately, however, when Strawberry
>went into a tirade at the man. All reports indicate he used a lot
>of profanity and accused the man of interference, and therefore of
>costing the Dodgers a game. Shortly afterwards other fans hurled
>food and beverages toward the man who made the catch. Dodger Stadium
>officials started to remove him from the park, but then relented and
>just relocated him to another area. In an interview after the game,
>Lasorda blamed the fan for the loss. Strawberry also went into a
>tirade about how the fans are stupid and they don't care about
>winning. L.A. Times columnists similarly blasted the man who made
>the catch.
Sounds like Darryl being Darryl, Tommy spending too much time on
Slim Fast and needs a pasta fix, and the media being their usual
"charming" selves. Sounds like a New York-like story to me!! :-)
I saw the replay and am wondering what the big deal is? I didn't
realize the folks in LA were making a big to do about it. I think
Stawberry, Lasorda and the various media types should sit and watch
the replay then apologize to the fan.
>Others have questioned why Darryl should be so concerned with what
>the fan did when he has a grand total of 1 rbi through the first
>nine games.
Darryl has not gotten off to a good start, he has to blame someone.
>But I guess the big debate continues as to what are the responsibilities
>of the fan.
As long as the fan doesn't interfere with the play I see no problems.
--
scott barman | Mets Mailing List (feed the following into your shell):
[email protected] | mail [email protected] <