All Downloads are FREE. Search and download functionalities are using the official Maven repository.

testcases.rdfxml.w3c-approved.Manifest.rdf Maven / Gradle / Ivy

The newest version!







   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   










   APPROVED
   
   
The claim that xsd:integer is a subClassOF xsd:decimal is not
incompatible with using the intensional semantics for datatypes.
   

   
   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
The claim that xsd:integer is a subClassOF xsd:string is
incompatible with using the intensional semantics for datatypes.
   

   
   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   











   APPROVED
   
   
	A simple datatype production; a language+datatype production. Simply duplicate the
	constructs under http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ntriples/test.nt
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
   
	A parser is not required to know about well-formed datatyped literals.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Without datatype knowledge, a 'badly-formed' datatyped literal cannot be detected.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   APPROVED
   
   
	With appropriate datatype knowledge, a 'badly-formed' datatyped literal can be detected.
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Demonstrating the semantic equivalence of two lexical forms of the same datatyped value.
   

   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
   
	As semantic-equivalence-within-type-1; the entailment works both ways.
   

   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   OBSOLETE
   
   
This test used to claim:
	Language attributes on a datatyped literal make them distinct for the purposes
	of non-datatype-aware entailments.
There are no longer language tags on datatyped literals.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   OBSOLETE
   
   
This test used to claim:
	Language attributes on a datatyped literal make them distinct for the purposes
	of non-datatype-aware entailments.
There are no longer language tags on datatyped literals.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   OBSOLETE
   
   
Obsoleted: datatyped literals have no language tag.
   

   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   OBSOLETE
   
   
Obsoleted: datatyped literals have no language tag.
   

   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   OBSOLETE
   
   
Obsoleted: datatyped literals have no language tag.
   

   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Members of different datatypes may be semantically equivalent.
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Where sufficient DT knowledge is available, a range clash may be detected; the document then
	contains a contradiction.
   

   
   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   OBSOLETE
   

   
Language does not affect the denotation of rdf:XMLLiteral. NOTE that this
is a change from previous versions of the spec.
Langauge tags do not live on XMLLiterals.
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	From decisions listed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0098.html
   

    

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	From decisions listed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0098.html
   

    

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	From decisions listed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0098.html
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
   
	A plain literal denotes the same thing as its corresponding xsd:string,
	where one exists.
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   









   APPROVED
   
 
   
	rdfs:subClassOf has intensional semantics, not extensional.
   

   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
 
   
	rdfs:subPropertyOf has intensional semantics, not extensional.
   

   
   
   
   

   


   
      
   

   
      
   









   APPROVED
   
   
Test that ICEXT(I(rdfs:Literal)) is a subset of LV.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   

   APPROVED
   

   
   
	Does the treatment of literals conform to charmod ?
	Test for success of legal Normal Form C literal
   

   
     
   

   
      
   






   

   WITHDRAWN
   

   
   
	Does the treatment of literals conform to charmod ?
	Test for failure for literal not in Normal Form C
This test case has been WITHDRAWN in light of changes to NFC handling
in concepts
   

   
      
   






   

   WITHDRAWN
   

   
   
	Does the treatment of literals conform to charmod ?
	Test for failure for literal not in Normal Form C
This test case has been WITHDRAWN in light of changes to NFC handling
in concepts
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
   
	A uriref is allowed to match non-US ASCII forms 
        conforming to Unicode Normal Form C.
        No escaping algorithm is applied.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
   
	A uriref which already has % escaping is permitted.
        No unescaping algorithm is applied.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   







   

   OBSOLETE
   

   
   
	Test for failure for uriref not in Normal Form C.
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
   
   
     An international URI ref and its %-escaped form label
     different nodes in the graph.
     No model theoretic relationship holds between them.
   

   

   
     
   

   
     
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
   
   
     An international URI ref and its %-escaped form label
     different nodes in the graph.
     No model theoretic relationship holds between them.
   

   

   
     
   

   
     
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   

   APPROVED
   

   
    A surrounding rdf:RDF element is no longer mandatory.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   





   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	This is again legal RDF
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
	rdf:aboutEach no longer valid.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   

   

   
   
	This test shows the treatment of non-ASCII characters
      in the value of rdf:ID attribute.
    

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   

   
   
   
	This test shows the treatment of non-ASCII characters
      in the value of rdf:about attribute.
    

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
The question posed to the RDF WG was: should an RDF document containing
multiple rdf:_n properties (with the same n) on an element be rejected as
illegal?
The WG decided that a parser should accept that case as legal RDF.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   
   APPROVED
   


   
Like rdfms-empty-property-elements/test001.rdf but with a processing instruction 
as the only content of the otherwise empty element.
    

   
      
   

   
      
   





   
   APPROVED
   


   
Like rdfms-empty-property-elements/test001.rdf but with a comment
as the only content of the otherwise empty element.
    

   
      
   

   
      
   









   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   

   
   
   
rdf:bagID is forbidden on property element prop with an rdf:resource or
rdf:parseType attribute: the following is in error.
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
        Two property attributes and a property element on an rdf:Description.
        Since the property attributes are not ordered under document
        order, two different n-triples files corresponding to both
        possible orderings are permitted. 
		One of test010a and test010b SHOULD pass, at least.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
        Two property attributes and a property element on an rdf:Description.
        Since the property attributes are not ordered under document
        order, two different n-triples files corresponding to both
        possible orderings are permitted. 
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
        Two property attributes and a property element on an rdf:Description.
        Since the property attributes are not ordered under document
        order, two different n-triples files corresponding to both
        possible orderings are permitted. 
		One of test011a and test011b SHOULD pass, at least.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
        Two property attributes and a property element on an rdf:Description.
        Since the property attributes are not ordered under document
        order, two different n-triples files corresponding to both
        possible orderings are permitted. 
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
        Two property attributes and a property element on an rdf:Description.
        Since the property attributes are not ordered under document
        order, two different n-triples files corresponding to both
        possible orderings are permitted. 
		One of test012a and test012b SHOULD pass, at least.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
        Two property attributes and a property element on an rdf:Description.
        Since the property attributes are not ordered under document
        order, two different n-triples files corresponding to both
        possible orderings are permitted. 
   

   
      
   

   
      
   









   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   NOT_APPROVED
   
   

   
      
   






   NOT_APPROVED
   
   

   
      
   






   NOT_APPROVED
   
   

   
      
   







   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:ID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:ID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:ID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:ID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:ID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:bagID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:bagID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   

    allowed with warnings 






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   

    allowed with warnings 






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   

    allowed with warnings 







   APPROVED
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   








   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Statement of the MT closure rule.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Statement of the MT closure rule.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
	Statement of the MT closure rule.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   









   

   APPROVED
   

   
	rdf:nodeID can be used to label a blank node.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	rdf:nodeID can be used to label a blank node.
      These have file scope and are distinct from any
      unlabelled blank nodes.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
     On an rdf:Description or typed node rdf:nodeID behaves
     similarly to an rdf:about.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
     On a property element rdf:nodeID behaves
     similarly to rdf:resource.
   

   
     
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:nodeID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:nodeID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	  The value of rdf:nodeID must match the XML Name production,
        (as modified by XML Namespaces). 
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	  Cannot have rdf:nodeID and rdf:ID.
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	  Cannot have rdf:nodeID and rdf:about.
   

   
      
   





   

   APPROVED
   

   
	  Cannot have rdf:nodeID and rdf:resource.
   

   
      
   







   APPROVED
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   
An RDF/XML serlializer is recommended to produce an exception if
asked to serialize the following graph since there is no way
to represent it in the RDF/XML syntax.
   

   
      
   

   
An RDF/XML serlializer is recommended to produce an exception if
asked to serialize the following graph since there is no way
to represent it in the RDF/XML syntax.
   







   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   

   
      
   

   
      
   









   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
Plain literals are distinguishable on the basis of language tags.
   

    

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
Plain literals are distinguishable on the basis of language tags.
   

    

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
Plain literals are distinguishable on the basis of language tags.
   

    

   
      
   

   
      
   









   
   APPROVED
   

   
   
     While it is a superproperty,
		_:a <rdfs:contains (@@member?)> _:b .
     does NOT entail
		_:a <rdf:_n> _:b .
	for any _n.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
Should a property be allowed more than one rdfs:range property?
What should the semantics of multiple domain and range properties be?

-> Multiple domain and range constraints are permissable
   and will have conjunctive semantics.

test001
  describes a property with rdfs:domain the intersection of 2 domains
test002
  describes a property with rdfs:range the intersection of 2 ranges
test003
  sample statement
test004
  entailed description using test001, test002, test003 and
  the rules for RDF and RDFS entailment
  (see http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/ )
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   
   
   APPROVED
   

   
RDF Semantics defines rdfs:range to have an intensional reading.
However, semantic extensions may give an extensional reading to range.
The premise/conclusion pair is a non-entailment for RDFS reasoning,
but may hold in semantic extensions.
   

   
   
  
       
  


   
      
   




   
   
   APPROVED
   
   
RDF Semantics defines rdfs:range to have an intensional reading of domain.
However, semantic extensions may give an extensional reading to domain.
The premise/conclusion pair is a non-entailment for RDFS reasoning,
but may hold in semantic extensions.
   

   
   
  
       
  


   
      
   








   APPROVED
   
   
 
   
Indicating a simple inconsistency drawn from RDFS. RDFS
can only produce inconsistencies through badly-formed XMLLiteral
datatypes.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
 
   
From an inconsistent graph, any entailment can be drawn. This is an
example.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   

   
	Cycles are permitted in subClassOf; therefore, no error occurs and the following entailment
	holds trivially.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   

   
	Cycles are permitted in subPropertyOf; therefore, no error occurs and the following entailment
	holds trivially.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   








   
   APPROVED
   

   
an instance of the Property class may have an rdfs:subClassOf property.
the meaning of such a property is defined by the model theory.

The wording of the formal resolution is a bit bare, so let me add a few 
words of explanation.  What this means is that a resource can be both a 
class and a property.

This test is encoded as follows: a Property may have a subclass (that is, such an RDF graph
is satisfiable)
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   
   APPROVED
   


   
    The inheritance semantics of the subPropertyOf relationship needs to be clarified.
 
    => subProperties inherit conjunctively the domain and range of their superproperties
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   







   APPROVED
   
   
     RDFCore WG RESOLVED that a reified statement was a stating, not a statement.
     The following entailment does not, therefore, hold.
   

   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
     RDFCore WG RESOLVED that a statement does NOT entail its reification.
     The following entailment does not, therefore, hold.
   

   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
     RDFCore WG RESOLVED that a reified statement was a stating, not a statement.
     The following entailment does not, therefore, hold.
	 This is the same as test001, but using RDFS-entailment.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
     RDFCore WG RESOLVED that a statement does NOT entail its reification.
     The following entailment does not, therefore, hold.
	 This is the same as test002, but using RDFS-entailment.
   

   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   











   APPROVED
   
 
   
	The case of the language tag is not significant.
   

   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
 
   
	The case of the language tag is not significant.
   

   

   
      
   

   
      
   








   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   










   APPROVED
   
   
Demonstrating the canonicalisation of XMLLiterals.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
	This test case concerns URIs relative to a non-relative URI scheme base.
	It's beyond the scope of the WG to deal with this; it has therefore not
	been approved.
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   OBSOLETE
   
   
   
This is not valid rdf/xml. The embedding of RDF/XML in other XML formats is
beyond the scope of these test cases. Test case withdrawn.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   WITHDRAWN
   
   
   
Test case WITHDRAWN in light of 2396bis
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   APPROVED
   
   
   
	Test output corrected to use correct base URL.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
   
   
This test case is deprecated. The use of mailto: URIs with xml:base is not within the scope of
RDFCore's charter to sort out.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   
   NOT_APPROVED
   
   
   
This test case is deprecated. The use of mailto: URIs with xml:base is not within the scope of
RDFCore's charter to sort out.
   

   
      
   

   
      
   









   APPROVED
   
 
   
A well-formed typed literal is not related to an ill-formed literal.
Even if they only differ by whitespace.      
   

   
   
   
   



   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
 
   
A well-formed typed literal is not related to an ill-formed literal.
Even if they only differ by whitespace.      
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   





   APPROVED
   
 
   
A simple test for well-formedness of a typed literal.
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   






   APPROVED
   
 
   
An integer with whitespace is ill-formed.
   

   
   
   
   

   
      
   

   
      
   










© 2015 - 2024 Weber Informatics LLC | Privacy Policy