org.elasticsearch.util.concurrent.jsr166y.RecursiveTask Maven / Gradle / Ivy

Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of elasticsearch Show documentation
Elasticsearch subproject :server
There is a newer version: 8.15.1
/*
 * Licensed to Elastic Search and Shay Banon under one
 * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 * distributed with this work for additional information
 * regarding copyright ownership. Elastic Search licenses this
 * file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
 * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
 * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
 * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
 * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */

/*
 * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
 * http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain
 */

package org.elasticsearch.util.concurrent.jsr166y;

/**
 * A recursive result-bearing {@link ForkJoinTask}.
 *
 * For a classic example, here is a task computing Fibonacci numbers:
 *
 * 
 {@code
 * class Fibonacci extends RecursiveTask {
 *   final int n;
 *   Fibonacci(int n) { this.n = n; }
 *   Integer compute() {
 *     if (n <= 1)
 *        return n;
 *     Fibonacci f1 = new Fibonacci(n - 1);
 *     f1.fork();
 *     Fibonacci f2 = new Fibonacci(n - 2);
 *     return f2.compute() + f1.join();
 *   }
 * }}
 *
 * However, besides being a dumb way to compute Fibonacci functions
 * (there is a simple fast linear algorithm that you'd use in
 * practice), this is likely to perform poorly because the smallest
 * subtasks are too small to be worthwhile splitting up. Instead, as
 * is the case for nearly all fork/join applications, you'd pick some
 * minimum granularity size (for example 10 here) for which you always
 * sequentially solve rather than subdividing.
 *
 * @author Doug Lea
 * @since 1.7
 */
public abstract class RecursiveTask extends ForkJoinTask {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = 5232453952276485270L;

    /**
     * The result of the computation.
     */
    V result;

    /**
     * The main computation performed by this task.
     */
    protected abstract V compute();

    public final V getRawResult() {
        return result;
    }

    protected final void setRawResult(V value) {
        result = value;
    }

    /**
     * Implements execution conventions for RecursiveTask.
     */
    protected final boolean exec() {
        result = compute();
        return true;
    }

}