org.jivesoftware.smackx.mood.MoodIntegrationTest Maven / Gradle / Ivy
The newest version!
/**
*
* Copyright 2018 Paul Schaub, 2019-2020 Florian Schmaus.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.jivesoftware.smackx.mood;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.SmackException;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException;
import org.jivesoftware.smackx.disco.EntityCapabilitiesChangedListener;
import org.jivesoftware.smackx.disco.ServiceDiscoveryManager;
import org.jivesoftware.smackx.mood.element.MoodElement;
import org.jivesoftware.smackx.pep.PepEventListener;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.AbstractSmackIntegrationTest;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.SmackIntegrationTestEnvironment;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.annotations.AfterClass;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.annotations.SmackIntegrationTest;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.annotations.SpecificationReference;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.util.IntegrationTestRosterUtil;
import org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.util.SimpleResultSyncPoint;
@SpecificationReference(document = "XEP-0107", version = "1.2.1")
public class MoodIntegrationTest extends AbstractSmackIntegrationTest {
private final MoodManager mm1;
private final MoodManager mm2;
public MoodIntegrationTest(SmackIntegrationTestEnvironment environment) {
super(environment);
mm1 = MoodManager.getInstanceFor(conOne);
mm2 = MoodManager.getInstanceFor(conTwo);
}
@AfterClass
public void unsubscribe()
throws SmackException.NotLoggedInException, XMPPException.XMPPErrorException,
SmackException.NotConnectedException, InterruptedException, SmackException.NoResponseException {
IntegrationTestRosterUtil.ensureBothAccountsAreNotInEachOthersRoster(conOne, conTwo);
}
/**
* Verifies that a notification is sent when a publication is received, assuming that notification filtering
* has been adjusted to allow for the notification to be delivered.
*
* @throws Exception if the test fails
*/
@SmackIntegrationTest
public void testNotification() throws Exception {
Mood data = Mood.satisfied;
IntegrationTestRosterUtil.ensureBothAccountsAreSubscribedToEachOther(conOne, conTwo, timeout);
final SimpleResultSyncPoint moodReceived = new SimpleResultSyncPoint();
final PepEventListener moodListener = (jid, moodElement, id, message) -> {
if (moodElement.getMood().equals(data)) {
moodReceived.signal();
}
};
try {
// Register ConTwo's interest in receiving mood notifications, and wait for that interest to have been propagated.
registerListenerAndWait(mm2, ServiceDiscoveryManager.getInstanceFor(conTwo), moodListener);
// Publish the data.
mm1.setMood(data); // for the purpose of this test, this needs not be blocking/use publishAndWait();
// Wait for the data to be received.
assertResult(moodReceived, "Expected " + conTwo.getUser() + " to receive a PEP notification, but did not.");
} finally {
unregisterListener(mm2, moodListener);
IntegrationTestRosterUtil.ensureBothAccountsAreNotInEachOthersRoster(conOne, conTwo);
}
}
/**
* Verifies that a notification for a previously sent publication is received as soon as notification filtering
* has been adjusted to allow for the notification to be delivered.
*
* @throws Exception if the test fails
*/
@SmackIntegrationTest
public void testNotificationAfterFilterChange() throws Exception {
Mood data = Mood.cautious;
IntegrationTestRosterUtil.ensureBothAccountsAreSubscribedToEachOther(conOne, conTwo, timeout);
final SimpleResultSyncPoint moodReceived = new SimpleResultSyncPoint();
final PepEventListener moodListener = (jid, moodElement, id, message) -> {
if (moodElement.getMood().equals(data)) {
moodReceived.signal();
}
};
// TODO Ensure that pre-existing filtering notification excludes mood.
try {
// Publish the data
publishAndWait(mm1, ServiceDiscoveryManager.getInstanceFor(conOne), data);
// Adds listener, which implicitly publishes a disco/info filter for mood notification.
registerListenerAndWait(mm2, ServiceDiscoveryManager.getInstanceFor(conTwo), moodListener);
// Wait for the data to be received.
assertResult(moodReceived, "Expected " + conTwo.getUser() + " to receive a PEP notification, but did not.");
} finally {
unregisterListener(mm2, moodListener);
IntegrationTestRosterUtil.ensureBothAccountsAreNotInEachOthersRoster(conOne, conTwo);
}
}
/**
* Registers a listener for User Tune data. This implicitly publishes a CAPS update to include a notification
* filter for the mood node. This method blocks until the server has indicated that this update has been
* received.
*
* @param moodManager The MoodManager instance for the connection that is expected to receive data.
* @param discoManager The ServiceDiscoveryManager instance for the connection that is expected to publish data.
* @param listener A listener instance for Mood data that is to be registered.
*
* @throws Exception if the test fails
*/
public void registerListenerAndWait(MoodManager moodManager, ServiceDiscoveryManager discoManager, PepEventListener listener) throws Exception {
final SimpleResultSyncPoint notificationFilterReceived = new SimpleResultSyncPoint();
final EntityCapabilitiesChangedListener notificationFilterReceivedListener = info -> {
if (info.containsFeature(MoodManager.MOOD_NODE + "+notify")) {
notificationFilterReceived.signal();
}
};
discoManager.addEntityCapabilitiesChangedListener(notificationFilterReceivedListener);
try {
moodManager.addMoodListener(listener);
notificationFilterReceived.waitForResult(timeout);
} finally {
discoManager.removeEntityCapabilitiesChangedListener(notificationFilterReceivedListener);
}
}
/**
* The functionally reverse of {@link #registerListenerAndWait(MoodManager, ServiceDiscoveryManager, PepEventListener)}
* with the difference of not being a blocking operation.
*
* @param moodManager The MoodManager instance for the connection that was expected to receive data.
* @param listener A listener instance for Mood data that is to be removed.
*/
public void unregisterListener(MoodManager moodManager, PepEventListener listener) {
// Does it make sense to have a method implementation that's one line? This is provided to allow for symmetry in the API.
moodManager.removeMoodListener(listener);
}
/**
* Publish data using PEP, and block until the server has echoed the publication back to the publishing user.
*
* @param moodManager The MoodManager instance for the connection that is expected to publish data.
* @param discoManager The ServiceDiscoveryManager instance for the connection that is expected to publish data.
* @param data The data to be published.
*
* @throws Exception if the test fails
*/
public void publishAndWait(MoodManager moodManager, ServiceDiscoveryManager discoManager, Mood data) throws Exception {
final SimpleResultSyncPoint publicationEchoReceived = new SimpleResultSyncPoint();
final PepEventListener publicationEchoListener = (jid, moodElement, id, message) -> {
if (moodElement.getMood().equals(data)) {
publicationEchoReceived.signal();
}
};
try {
registerListenerAndWait(moodManager, discoManager, publicationEchoListener);
moodManager.addMoodListener(publicationEchoListener);
moodManager.setMood(data);
} finally {
moodManager.removeMoodListener(publicationEchoListener);
}
}
}