All Downloads are FREE. Search and download functionalities are using the official Maven repository.

org.apache.lucene.util.FieldCacheSanityChecker Maven / Gradle / Ivy

There is a newer version: 9.1.7.Final
Show newest version
package org.apache.lucene.util;
/**
 * Copyright 2009 The Apache Software Foundation
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;

import org.apache.lucene.index.CompositeReader;
import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader;
import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReaderContext;
import org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache;
import org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache.CacheEntry;
import org.apache.lucene.store.AlreadyClosedException;

/** 
 * Provides methods for sanity checking that entries in the FieldCache 
 * are not wasteful or inconsistent.
 * 

*

* Lucene 2.9 Introduced numerous enhancements into how the FieldCache * is used by the low levels of Lucene searching (for Sorting and * ValueSourceQueries) to improve both the speed for Sorting, as well * as reopening of IndexReaders. But these changes have shifted the * usage of FieldCache from "top level" IndexReaders (frequently a * MultiReader or DirectoryReader) down to the leaf level SegmentReaders. * As a result, existing applications that directly access the FieldCache * may find RAM usage increase significantly when upgrading to 2.9 or * Later. This class provides an API for these applications (or their * Unit tests) to check at run time if the FieldCache contains "insane" * usages of the FieldCache. *

* @lucene.experimental * @see FieldCache * @see FieldCacheSanityChecker.Insanity * @see FieldCacheSanityChecker.InsanityType */ public final class FieldCacheSanityChecker { private boolean estimateRam; public FieldCacheSanityChecker() { /* NOOP */ } /** * If set, estimate size for all CacheEntry objects will be calculateed. */ public void setRamUsageEstimator(boolean flag) { estimateRam = flag; } /** * Quick and dirty convenience method * @see #check */ public static Insanity[] checkSanity(FieldCache cache) { return checkSanity(cache.getCacheEntries()); } /** * Quick and dirty convenience method that instantiates an instance with * "good defaults" and uses it to test the CacheEntrys * @see #check */ public static Insanity[] checkSanity(CacheEntry... cacheEntries) { FieldCacheSanityChecker sanityChecker = new FieldCacheSanityChecker(); sanityChecker.setRamUsageEstimator(true); return sanityChecker.check(cacheEntries); } /** * Tests a CacheEntry[] for indication of "insane" cache usage. *

* NOTE:FieldCache CreationPlaceholder objects are ignored. * (:TODO: is this a bad idea? are we masking a real problem?) *

*/ public Insanity[] check(CacheEntry... cacheEntries) { if (null == cacheEntries || 0 == cacheEntries.length) return new Insanity[0]; if (estimateRam) { for (int i = 0; i < cacheEntries.length; i++) { cacheEntries[i].estimateSize(); } } // the indirect mapping lets MapOfSet dedup identical valIds for us // // maps the (valId) identityhashCode of cache values to // sets of CacheEntry instances final MapOfSets valIdToItems = new MapOfSets<>(new HashMap>(17)); // maps ReaderField keys to Sets of ValueIds final MapOfSets readerFieldToValIds = new MapOfSets<>(new HashMap>(17)); // // any keys that we know result in more then one valId final Set valMismatchKeys = new HashSet<>(); // iterate over all the cacheEntries to get the mappings we'll need for (int i = 0; i < cacheEntries.length; i++) { final CacheEntry item = cacheEntries[i]; final Object val = item.getValue(); // It's OK to have dup entries, where one is eg // float[] and the other is the Bits (from // getDocWithField()) if (val instanceof Bits) { continue; } if (val instanceof FieldCache.CreationPlaceholder) continue; final ReaderField rf = new ReaderField(item.getReaderKey(), item.getFieldName()); final Integer valId = Integer.valueOf(System.identityHashCode(val)); // indirect mapping, so the MapOfSet will dedup identical valIds for us valIdToItems.put(valId, item); if (1 < readerFieldToValIds.put(rf, valId)) { valMismatchKeys.add(rf); } } final List insanity = new ArrayList<>(valMismatchKeys.size() * 3); insanity.addAll(checkValueMismatch(valIdToItems, readerFieldToValIds, valMismatchKeys)); insanity.addAll(checkSubreaders(valIdToItems, readerFieldToValIds)); return insanity.toArray(new Insanity[insanity.size()]); } /** * Internal helper method used by check that iterates over * valMismatchKeys and generates a Collection of Insanity * instances accordingly. The MapOfSets are used to populate * the Insanity objects. * @see InsanityType#VALUEMISMATCH */ private Collection checkValueMismatch(MapOfSets valIdToItems, MapOfSets readerFieldToValIds, Set valMismatchKeys) { final List insanity = new ArrayList<>(valMismatchKeys.size() * 3); if (! valMismatchKeys.isEmpty() ) { // we have multiple values for some ReaderFields final Map> rfMap = readerFieldToValIds.getMap(); final Map> valMap = valIdToItems.getMap(); for (final ReaderField rf : valMismatchKeys) { final List badEntries = new ArrayList<>(valMismatchKeys.size() * 2); for(final Integer value: rfMap.get(rf)) { for (final CacheEntry cacheEntry : valMap.get(value)) { badEntries.add(cacheEntry); } } CacheEntry[] badness = new CacheEntry[badEntries.size()]; badness = badEntries.toArray(badness); insanity.add(new Insanity(InsanityType.VALUEMISMATCH, "Multiple distinct value objects for " + rf.toString(), badness)); } } return insanity; } /** * Internal helper method used by check that iterates over * the keys of readerFieldToValIds and generates a Collection * of Insanity instances whenever two (or more) ReaderField instances are * found that have an ancestry relationships. * * @see InsanityType#SUBREADER */ private Collection checkSubreaders( MapOfSets valIdToItems, MapOfSets readerFieldToValIds) { final List insanity = new ArrayList<>(23); Map> badChildren = new HashMap<>(17); MapOfSets badKids = new MapOfSets<>(badChildren); // wrapper Map> viToItemSets = valIdToItems.getMap(); Map> rfToValIdSets = readerFieldToValIds.getMap(); Set seen = new HashSet<>(17); Set readerFields = rfToValIdSets.keySet(); for (final ReaderField rf : readerFields) { if (seen.contains(rf)) continue; List kids = getAllDescendantReaderKeys(rf.readerKey); for (Object kidKey : kids) { ReaderField kid = new ReaderField(kidKey, rf.fieldName); if (badChildren.containsKey(kid)) { // we've already process this kid as RF and found other problems // track those problems as our own badKids.put(rf, kid); badKids.putAll(rf, badChildren.get(kid)); badChildren.remove(kid); } else if (rfToValIdSets.containsKey(kid)) { // we have cache entries for the kid badKids.put(rf, kid); } seen.add(kid); } seen.add(rf); } // every mapping in badKids represents an Insanity for (final ReaderField parent : badChildren.keySet()) { Set kids = badChildren.get(parent); List badEntries = new ArrayList<>(kids.size() * 2); // put parent entr(ies) in first { for (final Integer value : rfToValIdSets.get(parent)) { badEntries.addAll(viToItemSets.get(value)); } } // now the entries for the descendants for (final ReaderField kid : kids) { for (final Integer value : rfToValIdSets.get(kid)) { badEntries.addAll(viToItemSets.get(value)); } } CacheEntry[] badness = new CacheEntry[badEntries.size()]; badness = badEntries.toArray(badness); insanity.add(new Insanity(InsanityType.SUBREADER, "Found caches for descendants of " + parent.toString(), badness)); } return insanity; } /** * Checks if the seed is an IndexReader, and if so will walk * the hierarchy of subReaders building up a list of the objects * returned by {@code seed.getCoreCacheKey()} */ private List getAllDescendantReaderKeys(Object seed) { List all = new ArrayList<>(17); // will grow as we iter all.add(seed); for (int i = 0; i < all.size(); i++) { final Object obj = all.get(i); // TODO: We don't check closed readers here (as getTopReaderContext // throws AlreadyClosedException), what should we do? Reflection? if (obj instanceof IndexReader) { try { final List childs = ((IndexReader) obj).getContext().children(); if (childs != null) { // it is composite reader for (final IndexReaderContext ctx : childs) { all.add(ctx.reader().getCoreCacheKey()); } } } catch (AlreadyClosedException ace) { // ignore this reader } } } // need to skip the first, because it was the seed return all.subList(1, all.size()); } /** * Simple pair object for using "readerKey + fieldName" a Map key */ private final static class ReaderField { public final Object readerKey; public final String fieldName; public ReaderField(Object readerKey, String fieldName) { this.readerKey = readerKey; this.fieldName = fieldName; } @Override public int hashCode() { return System.identityHashCode(readerKey) * fieldName.hashCode(); } @Override public boolean equals(Object that) { if (! (that instanceof ReaderField)) return false; ReaderField other = (ReaderField) that; return (this.readerKey == other.readerKey && this.fieldName.equals(other.fieldName)); } @Override public String toString() { return readerKey.toString() + "+" + fieldName; } } /** * Simple container for a collection of related CacheEntry objects that * in conjunction with each other represent some "insane" usage of the * FieldCache. */ public final static class Insanity { private final InsanityType type; private final String msg; private final CacheEntry[] entries; public Insanity(InsanityType type, String msg, CacheEntry... entries) { if (null == type) { throw new IllegalArgumentException ("Insanity requires non-null InsanityType"); } if (null == entries || 0 == entries.length) { throw new IllegalArgumentException ("Insanity requires non-null/non-empty CacheEntry[]"); } this.type = type; this.msg = msg; this.entries = entries; } /** * Type of insane behavior this object represents */ public InsanityType getType() { return type; } /** * Description of hte insane behavior */ public String getMsg() { return msg; } /** * CacheEntry objects which suggest a problem */ public CacheEntry[] getCacheEntries() { return entries; } /** * Multi-Line representation of this Insanity object, starting with * the Type and Msg, followed by each CacheEntry.toString() on it's * own line prefaced by a tab character */ @Override public String toString() { StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder(); buf.append(getType()).append(": "); String m = getMsg(); if (null != m) buf.append(m); buf.append('\n'); CacheEntry[] ce = getCacheEntries(); for (int i = 0; i < ce.length; i++) { buf.append('\t').append(ce[i].toString()).append('\n'); } return buf.toString(); } } /** * An Enumeration of the different types of "insane" behavior that * may be detected in a FieldCache. * * @see InsanityType#SUBREADER * @see InsanityType#VALUEMISMATCH * @see InsanityType#EXPECTED */ public final static class InsanityType { private final String label; private InsanityType(final String label) { this.label = label; } @Override public String toString() { return label; } /** * Indicates an overlap in cache usage on a given field * in sub/super readers. */ public final static InsanityType SUBREADER = new InsanityType("SUBREADER"); /** *

* Indicates entries have the same reader+fieldname but * different cached values. This can happen if different datatypes, * or parsers are used -- and while it's not necessarily a bug * it's typically an indication of a possible problem. *

*

* NOTE: Only the reader, fieldname, and cached value are actually * tested -- if two cache entries have different parsers or datatypes but * the cached values are the same Object (== not just equal()) this method * does not consider that a red flag. This allows for subtle variations * in the way a Parser is specified (null vs DEFAULT_LONG_PARSER, etc...) *

*/ public final static InsanityType VALUEMISMATCH = new InsanityType("VALUEMISMATCH"); /** * Indicates an expected bit of "insanity". This may be useful for * clients that wish to preserve/log information about insane usage * but indicate that it was expected. */ public final static InsanityType EXPECTED = new InsanityType("EXPECTED"); } }