primitive.BooleanPairedTimSort Maven / Gradle / Ivy
Go to download
Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of util Show documentation
Show all versions of util Show documentation
Supplementary utilities for classes that belong to java.util, or are considered essential as to justify existence in java.util.
The newest version!
/* Copyright (c) 2019 LibJ
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
* in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
* to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
* copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* You should have received a copy of The MIT License (MIT) along with this
* program. If not, see .
*/
package org.libj.util.primitive;
import javax.annotation.Generated;
/**
* A stable, adaptive, iterative mergesort that requires far fewer than n lg(n)
* comparisons when running on partially sorted arrays, while offering
* performance comparable to a traditional mergesort when run on random arrays.
* Like all proper mergesorts, this sort is stable and runs O(n log n) time
* (worst case). In the worst case, this sort requires temporary storage space
* for n/2 object references; in the best case, it requires only a small
* constant amount of space. This implementation was adapted from Tim Peters's
* list sort for Python, which is described in detail here:
* http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Objects/listsort.txt Tim's C code
* may be found here:
* http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Objects/listobject.c The
* underlying techniques are described in this paper (and may have even earlier
* origins): "Optimistic Sorting and Information Theoretic Complexity" Peter
* McIlroy SODA (Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms), pp
* 467-474, Austin, Texas, 25-27 January 1993. While the API to this class
* consists solely of static methods, it is (privately) instantiable; a
* IntTrimSort instance holds the state of an ongoing sort, assuming the input
* array is large enough to warrant the full-blown IntTrimSort. Small arrays are
* sorted in place, using a binary insertion sort.
*
* @author Josh Bloch
* @see java.util.TimSort
*/
@SuppressWarnings("all")
@Generated(value="org.openjax.codegen.template.Templates", date="2024-02-27T13:50:20.763")
class BooleanPairedTimSort extends PrimitiveTimSort {
/**
* the array of sortable values being sorted.
*/
private final boolean[] a;
/**
* the array of paired values being sorted.
*/
private final Object[] v;
/**
* The comparator for this sort.
*/
private final BooleanComparator c;
/**
* This controls when we get *into* galloping mode. It is initialized to
* MIN_GALLOP. The mergeLo and mergeHi methods nudge it higher for random
* data, and lower for highly structured data.
*/
private int minGallop = MIN_GALLOP;
/**
* Temp storage for merges. A workspace array may optionally be provided in
* constructor, and if so will be used as boolean as it is big enough.
*/
private boolean[] tmp;
/**
* Temp storage for paired values, with indexes synchronized with {@link #tmp}.
*/
private Object[] tmpV;
/**
* Creates a IntTrimSort instance to maintain the state of an ongoing sort.
*
* @param a the array of sortable values
* @param v the array of paired values
* @param c the comparator to determine the order of the sort
* @param work a workspace array (slice)
* @param workBase origin of usable space in work array
* @param workLen usable size of work array
*/
private BooleanPairedTimSort(final boolean[] a, final Object[] v, final BooleanComparator c, final boolean[] work, final int workBase, final int workLen) {
this.a = a;
this.c = c;
this.v = v;
// Allocate temp storage (which may be increased later if necessary)
final int len = a.length;
final int tlen = (len < 2 * INITIAL_TMP_STORAGE_LENGTH) ? len >>> 1 : INITIAL_TMP_STORAGE_LENGTH;
if (work == null || workLen < tlen || workBase + tlen > work.length) {
final boolean[] newArray = new boolean[tlen];
tmp = newArray;
tmpBase = 0;
tmpLen = tlen;
}
else {
tmp = work;
tmpBase = workBase;
tmpLen = workLen;
}
/*
* Allocate runs-to-be-merged stack (which cannot be expanded). The stack
* length requirements are described in listsort.txt. The C version always
* uses the same stack length (85), but this was measured to be too
* expensive when sorting "mid-sized" arrays (e.g., 100 elements) in Java.
* Therefore, we use smaller (but sufficiently large) stack lengths for
* smaller arrays. The "magic numbers" in the computation below must be
* changed if MIN_MERGE is decreased. See the MIN_MERGE declaration above
* for more information. The maximum value of 49 allows for an array up to
* length Integer.MAX_VALUE-4, if array is filled by the worst case stack
* size increasing scenario. More explanations are given in section 4 of:
* http://envisage-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/sorting.pdf
*/
final int stackLen = (len < 120 ? 5 : len < 1542 ? 10 : len < 119151 ? 24 : 49);
runBase = new int[stackLen];
runLen = new int[stackLen];
}
/*
* The next method (package private and static) constitutes the entire API of
* this class.
*/
/**
* Sorts the given range, using the given workspace array slice for temp
* storage when possible. This method is designed to be invoked from public
* methods (in class Arrays) after performing any necessary array bounds
* checks and expanding parameters into the required forms.
*
* @param a the array of sortable values
* @param v the array of paired values
* @param lo the index of the first element, inclusive, to be sorted
* @param hi the index of the last element, exclusive, to be sorted
* @param c the comparator to use
* @param work a workspace array (slice)
* @param workBase origin of usable space in work array
* @param workLen usable size of work array
* @since 1.8
*/
static void sort(final boolean[] a, final Object[] v, int lo, final int hi, final BooleanComparator c, final boolean[] work, final int workBase, final int workLen) {
assert c != null && a != null && lo >= 0 && lo <= hi && hi <= a.length;
int nRemaining = hi - lo;
if (nRemaining < 2)
return; // Arrays of size 0 and 1 are always sorted
// If array is small, do a "mini-IntTrimSort" with no merges
if (nRemaining < MIN_MERGE) {
int initRunLen = countRunAndMakeAscending(a, v, lo, hi, c);
binarySort(a, v, lo, hi, lo + initRunLen, c);
return;
}
/**
* March over the array once, left to right, finding natural runs, extending
* short natural runs to minRun elements, and merging runs to maintain stack
* invariant.
*/
final BooleanPairedTimSort ts = new BooleanPairedTimSort(a, v, c, work, workBase, workLen);
final int minRun = minRunLength(nRemaining);
do {
// Identify next run
int runLen = countRunAndMakeAscending(a, v, lo, hi, c);
// If run is short, extend to min(minRun, nRemaining)
if (runLen < minRun) {
final int force = nRemaining <= minRun ? nRemaining : minRun;
binarySort(a, v, lo, lo + force, lo + runLen, c);
runLen = force;
}
// Push run onto pending-run stack, and maybe merge
ts.pushRun(lo, runLen);
ts.mergeCollapse();
// Advance to find next run
lo += runLen;
nRemaining -= runLen;
}
while (nRemaining != 0);
// Merge all remaining runs to complete sort
assert lo == hi;
ts.mergeForceCollapse();
assert ts.stackSize == 1;
}
/**
* Sorts the specified portion of the specified array using a binary insertion
* sort. This is the best method for sorting small numbers of elements. It
* requires O(n log n) compares, but O(n^2) data movement (worst case). If the
* initial part of the specified range is already sorted, this method can take
* advantage of it: the method assumes that the elements from index
* {@code lo}, inclusive, to {@code start}, exclusive are already sorted.
*
* @param a the array of sortable values in which a range is to be sorted
* @param v the array of paired values in which a range is to be sorted
* @param lo the index of the first element in the range to be sorted
* @param hi the index after the last element in the range to be sorted
* @param start the index of the first element in the range that is not
* already known to be sorted ({@code lo <= start <= hi})
* @param c comparator to used for the sort
*/
private static void binarySort(final boolean[] a, final Object[] v, final int lo, final int hi, int start, final BooleanComparator c) {
assert lo <= start && start <= hi;
if (start == lo)
++start;
for (; start < hi; ++start) { // [N]
final boolean pivot = a[start];
final Object v0 = v[start];
// Set left (and right) to the index where a[start] (pivot) belongs
int left = lo;
int right = start;
assert left <= right;
/*
* Invariants: pivot >= all in [lo, left). pivot < all in [right, start).
*/
while (left < right) {
final int mid = (left + right) >>> 1;
if (c.compare(pivot, a[mid]) < 0)
right = mid;
else
left = mid + 1;
}
assert left == right;
/*
* The invariants still hold: pivot >= all in [lo, left) and pivot < all
* in [left, start), so pivot belongs at left. Note that if there are
* elements equal to pivot, left points to the first slot after them --
* that's why this sort is stable. Slide elements over to make room for
* pivot.
*/
final int n = start - left; // The number of elements to move
// Switch is just an optimization for arraycopy in default case
switch (n) {
case 2:
a[left + 2] = a[left + 1];
v[left + 2] = v[left + 1];
case 1:
a[left + 1] = a[left];
v[left + 1] = v[left];
break;
default:
System.arraycopy(a, left, a, left + 1, n);
System.arraycopy(v, left, v, left + 1, n);
}
a[left] = pivot;
v[left] = v0;
}
}
/**
* Returns the length of the run beginning at the specified position in the
* specified array and reverses the run if it is descending (ensuring that the
* run will always be ascending when the method returns). A run is the longest
* ascending sequence with: a[lo] <= a[lo + 1] <= a[lo + 2] <= ... or the
* longest descending sequence with: a[lo] > a[lo + 1] > a[lo + 2] > ... For
* its intended use in a stable mergesort, the strictness of the definition of
* "descending" is needed so that the call can safely reverse a descending
* sequence without violating stability.
*
* @param a the array of sortable values in which a run is to be counted and
* possibly reversed
* @param v the array of paired values in which a run is to be counted and
* possibly reversed
* @param lo index of the first element in the run
* @param hi index after the last element that may be contained in the run. It
* is required that {@code lo < hi}.
* @param c the comparator to used for the sort
* @return the length of the run beginning at the specified position in the
* specified array
*/
private static int countRunAndMakeAscending(final boolean[] a, final Object[] v, final int lo, final int hi, final BooleanComparator c) {
assert lo < hi;
int runHi = lo + 1;
if (runHi == hi)
return 1;
// Find end of run, and reverse range if descending
if (c.compare(a[runHi++], a[lo]) < 0) { // Descending
while (runHi < hi && c.compare(a[runHi], a[runHi - 1]) < 0)
++runHi;
reverseRange(a, v, lo, runHi);
}
else { // Ascending
while (runHi < hi && c.compare(a[runHi], a[runHi - 1]) >= 0)
++runHi;
}
return runHi - lo;
}
/**
* Reverse the specified range of the specified array.
*
* @param a the array of sortable values in which a range is to be reversed
* @param v the array of paired values in which a range is to be reversed
* @param lo the index of the first element in the range to be reversed
* @param hi the index after the last element in the range to be reversed
*/
private static void reverseRange(final boolean[] a, final Object[] v, int lo, int hi) {
--hi;
while (lo < hi) {
final boolean t = a[lo];
final Object v0 = v[lo];
a[lo] = a[hi];
v[lo] = v[hi];
a[hi] = t;
v[hi] = v0;
}
}
/**
* Merges the two runs at stack indices i and i+1. Run i must be the
* penultimate or antepenultimate run on the stack. In other words, i must be
* equal to stackSize-2 or stackSize-3.
*
* @param i stack index of the first of the two runs to merge
*/
@Override
void mergeAt(final int i) {
assert stackSize >= 2;
assert i >= 0;
assert i == stackSize - 2 || i == stackSize - 3;
int base1 = runBase[i];
int len1 = runLen[i];
final int base2 = runBase[i + 1];
int len2 = runLen[i + 1];
assert len1 > 0 && len2 > 0;
assert base1 + len1 == base2;
/*
* Record the length of the combined runs; if i is the 3rd-last run now,
* also slide over the last run (which isn't involved in this merge). The
* current run (i+1) goes away in any case.
*/
runLen[i] = len1 + len2;
if (i == stackSize - 3) {
runBase[i + 1] = runBase[i + 2];
runLen[i + 1] = runLen[i + 2];
}
--stackSize;
/*
* Find where the first element of run2 goes in run1. Prior elements in run1
* can be ignored (because they're already in place).
*/
final int k = gallopRight(a[base2], a, base1, len1, 0, c);
assert k >= 0;
base1 += k;
len1 -= k;
if (len1 == 0)
return;
/*
* Find where the last element of run1 goes in run2. Subsequent elements in
* run2 can be ignored (because they're already in place).
*/
len2 = gallopLeft(a[base1 + len1 - 1], a, base2, len2, len2 - 1, c);
assert len2 >= 0;
if (len2 == 0)
return;
// Merge remaining runs, using tmp array with min(len1, len2) elements
if (len1 <= len2)
mergeLo(base1, len1, base2, len2);
else
mergeHi(base1, len1, base2, len2);
}
/**
* Locates the position at which to insert the specified key into the
* specified sorted range; if the range contains an element equal to key,
* returns the index of the leftmost equal element.
*
* @param key the key whose insertion point to search for
* @param a the array of sortable values in which to search
* @param base the index of the first element in the range
* @param len the length of the range; must be > 0
* @param hint the index at which to begin the search, 0 <= hint < n. The
* closer hint is to the result, the faster this method will run.
* @param c the comparator used to order the range, and to search
* @return the int k, 0 <= k <= n such that a[b + k - 1] < key <= a[b + k],
* pretending that a[b - 1] is minus infinity and a[b + n] is
* infinity. In other words, key belongs at index b + k; or in other
* words, the first k elements of a should precede key, and the last n
* - k should follow it.
*/
private static int gallopLeft(final boolean key, final boolean[] a, final int base, final int len, final int hint, final BooleanComparator c) {
assert len > 0 && hint >= 0 && hint < len;
int lastOfs = 0;
int ofs = 1;
if (c.compare(key, a[base + hint]) > 0) {
// Gallop right until a[base+hint+lastOfs] < key <= a[base+hint+ofs]
final int maxOfs = len - hint;
while (ofs < maxOfs && c.compare(key, a[base + hint + ofs]) > 0) {
lastOfs = ofs;
ofs = (ofs << 1) + 1;
if (ofs <= 0) // int overflow
ofs = maxOfs;
}
if (ofs > maxOfs)
ofs = maxOfs;
// Make offsets relative to base
lastOfs += hint;
ofs += hint;
}
else { // key <= a[base + hint]
// Gallop left until a[base+hint-ofs] < key <= a[base+hint-lastOfs]
final int maxOfs = hint + 1;
while (ofs < maxOfs && c.compare(key, a[base + hint - ofs]) <= 0) {
lastOfs = ofs;
ofs = (ofs << 1) + 1;
if (ofs <= 0) // int overflow
ofs = maxOfs;
}
if (ofs > maxOfs)
ofs = maxOfs;
// Make offsets relative to base
final int tmp = lastOfs;
lastOfs = hint - ofs;
ofs = hint - tmp;
}
assert -1 <= lastOfs && lastOfs < ofs && ofs <= len;
/*
* Now a[base+lastOfs] < key <= a[base+ofs], so key belongs somewhere to the
* right of lastOfs but no farther right than ofs. Do a binary search, with
* invariant a[base + lastOfs - 1] < key <= a[base + ofs].
*/
++lastOfs;
while (lastOfs < ofs) {
final int m = lastOfs + ((ofs - lastOfs) >>> 1);
if (c.compare(key, a[base + m]) > 0)
lastOfs = m + 1; // a[base + m] < key
else
ofs = m; // key <= a[base + m]
}
assert lastOfs == ofs; // so a[base + ofs - 1] < key <= a[base + ofs]
return ofs;
}
/**
* Like gallopLeft, except that if the range contains an element equal to key,
* gallopRight returns the index after the rightmost equal element.
*
* @param key the key whose insertion point to search for
* @param a the array of sortable values in which to search
* @param base the index of the first element in the range
* @param len the length of the range; must be > 0
* @param hint the index at which to begin the search, 0 <= hint < n. The
* closer hint is to the result, the faster this method will run.
* @param c the comparator used to order the range, and to search
* @return the int k, 0 <= k <= n such that a[b + k - 1] <= key < a[b + k]
*/
private static int gallopRight(final boolean key, final boolean[] a, final int base, final int len, final int hint, final BooleanComparator c) {
assert len > 0 && hint >= 0 && hint < len;
int ofs = 1;
int lastOfs = 0;
if (c.compare(key, a[base + hint]) < 0) {
// Gallop left until a[b+hint - ofs] <= key < a[b+hint - lastOfs]
final int maxOfs = hint + 1;
while (ofs < maxOfs && c.compare(key, a[base + hint - ofs]) < 0) {
lastOfs = ofs;
ofs = (ofs << 1) + 1;
if (ofs <= 0) // int overflow
ofs = maxOfs;
}
if (ofs > maxOfs)
ofs = maxOfs;
// Make offsets relative to b
final int tmp = lastOfs;
lastOfs = hint - ofs;
ofs = hint - tmp;
}
else { // a[b + hint] <= key
// Gallop right until a[b+hint + lastOfs] <= key < a[b+hint + ofs]
final int maxOfs = len - hint;
while (ofs < maxOfs && c.compare(key, a[base + hint + ofs]) >= 0) {
lastOfs = ofs;
ofs = (ofs << 1) + 1;
if (ofs <= 0) // int overflow
ofs = maxOfs;
}
if (ofs > maxOfs)
ofs = maxOfs;
// Make offsets relative to b
lastOfs += hint;
ofs += hint;
}
assert -1 <= lastOfs && lastOfs < ofs && ofs <= len;
/*
* Now a[b + lastOfs] <= key < a[b + ofs], so key belongs somewhere to the
* right of lastOfs but no farther right than ofs. Do a binary search, with
* invariant a[b + lastOfs - 1] <= key < a[b + ofs].
*/
++lastOfs;
while (lastOfs < ofs) {
final int m = lastOfs + ((ofs - lastOfs) >>> 1);
if (c.compare(key, a[base + m]) < 0)
ofs = m; // key < a[b + m]
else
lastOfs = m + 1; // a[b + m] <= key
}
assert lastOfs == ofs; // so a[b + ofs - 1] <= key < a[b + ofs]
return ofs;
}
/**
* Merges two adjacent runs in place, in a stable fashion. The first element
* of the first run must be greater than the first element of the second run
* (a[base1] > a[base2]), and the last element of the first run (a[base1 +
* len1-1]) must be greater than all elements of the second run. For
* performance, this method should be called only when len1 <= len2; its twin,
* mergeHi should be called if len1 >= len2. (Either method may be called if
* len1 == len2.)
*
* @param base1 index of first element in first run to be merged
* @param len1 length of first run to be merged (must be > 0)
* @param base2 index of first element in second run to be merged (must be
* aBase + aLen)
* @param len2 length of second run to be merged (must be > 0)
*/
private void mergeLo(final int base1, int len1, final int base2, int len2) {
assert len1 > 0 && len2 > 0 && base1 + len1 == base2;
// Copy first run into temp array
final boolean[] a = this.a; // For performance
final Object[] v = this.v; // For performance
final boolean[] tmp = ensureCapacity(len1);
final Object[] tmpV = this.tmpV;
int cursor1 = tmpBase; // Indexes into tmp array
int cursor2 = base2; // Indexes int a
int dest = base1; // Indexes int a
System.arraycopy(a, base1, tmp, cursor1, len1);
System.arraycopy(v, base1, tmpV, cursor1, len1);
// Move first element of second run and deal with degenerate cases
a[dest] = a[cursor2];
v[dest++] = v[cursor2++];
if (--len2 == 0) {
System.arraycopy(tmp, cursor1, a, dest, len1);
System.arraycopy(tmpV, cursor1, v, dest, len1);
return;
}
if (len1 == 1) {
System.arraycopy(a, cursor2, a, dest, len2);
System.arraycopy(v, cursor2, v, dest, len2);
a[dest + len2] = tmp[cursor1]; // Last elt of run 1 to end of merge
v[dest + len2] = tmpV[cursor1]; // Last elt of run 1 to end of merge
return;
}
final BooleanComparator c = this.c; // Use local variable for performance
int minGallop = this.minGallop; // " " " " "
outer:
while (true) {
int count1 = 0; // Number of times in a row that first run won
int count2 = 0; // Number of times in a row that second run won
/*
* Do the straightforward thing until (if ever) one run starts winning
* consistently.
*/
do {
assert len1 > 1 && len2 > 0;
if (c.compare(a[cursor2], tmp[cursor1]) < 0) {
a[dest] = a[cursor2];
v[dest++] = v[cursor2++];
++count2;
count1 = 0;
if (--len2 == 0)
break outer;
}
else {
a[dest] = tmp[cursor1];
v[dest] = tmpV[cursor1];
++count1;
count2 = 0;
if (--len1 == 1)
break outer;
}
}
while ((count1 | count2) < minGallop);
/*
* One run is winning so consistently that galloping may be a huge win. So
* try that, and continue galloping until (if ever) neither run appears to
* be winning consistently anymore.
*/
do {
assert len1 > 1 && len2 > 0;
count1 = gallopRight(a[cursor2], tmp, cursor1, len1, 0, c);
if (count1 != 0) {
System.arraycopy(tmp, cursor1, a, dest, count1);
System.arraycopy(tmpV, cursor1, v, dest, count1);
dest += count1;
cursor1 += count1;
len1 -= count1;
if (len1 <= 1) // len1 == 1 || len1 == 0
break outer;
}
a[dest] = a[cursor2];
v[dest++] = v[cursor2++];
if (--len2 == 0)
break outer;
count2 = gallopLeft(tmp[cursor1], a, cursor2, len2, 0, c);
if (count2 != 0) {
System.arraycopy(a, cursor2, a, dest, count2);
System.arraycopy(v, cursor2, v, dest, count2);
dest += count2;
cursor2 += count2;
len2 -= count2;
if (len2 == 0)
break outer;
}
a[dest] = tmp[cursor1];
v[dest++] = tmpV[cursor1++];
if (--len1 == 1)
break outer;
--minGallop;
}
while (count1 >= MIN_GALLOP | count2 >= MIN_GALLOP);
if (minGallop < 0)
minGallop = 0;
minGallop += 2; // Penalize for leaving gallop mode
} // End of "outer" loop
this.minGallop = minGallop < 1 ? 1 : minGallop; // Write back to field
if (len1 == 1) {
assert len2 > 0;
System.arraycopy(a, cursor2, a, dest, len2);
System.arraycopy(v, cursor2, v, dest, len2);
a[dest + len2] = tmp[cursor1]; // Last elt of run 1 to end of merge
v[dest + len2] = tmpV[cursor1]; // Last elt of run 1 to end of merge
}
else if (len1 == 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Comparison method violates its general contract!");
}
else {
assert len2 == 0;
assert len1 > 1;
System.arraycopy(tmp, cursor1, a, dest, len1);
System.arraycopy(tmpV, cursor1, v, dest, len1);
}
}
/**
* Like mergeLo, except that this method should be called only if len1 >=
* len2; mergeLo should be called if len1 <= len2. (Either method may be
* called if len1 == len2.)
*
* @param base1 index of first element in first run to be merged
* @param len1 length of first run to be merged (must be > 0)
* @param base2 index of first element in second run to be merged (must be
* aBase + aLen)
* @param len2 length of second run to be merged (must be > 0)
*/
private void mergeHi(final int base1, int len1, final int base2, int len2) {
assert len1 > 0 && len2 > 0 && base1 + len1 == base2;
// Copy second run into temp array
final boolean[] a = this.a; // For performance
final Object[] v = this.v; // For performance
final boolean[] tmp = ensureCapacity(len2);
final Object[] tmpV = this.tmpV;
final int tmpBase = this.tmpBase;
System.arraycopy(a, base2, tmp, tmpBase, len2);
System.arraycopy(v, base2, tmpV, tmpBase, len2);
int cursor1 = base1 + len1 - 1; // Indexes into a
int cursor2 = tmpBase + len2 - 1; // Indexes into tmp array
int dest = base2 + len2 - 1; // Indexes into a
// Move last element of first run and deal with degenerate cases
a[dest] = a[cursor1];
v[dest--] = v[cursor1--];
if (--len1 == 0) {
final int start = dest - (len2 - 1);
System.arraycopy(tmp, tmpBase, a, start, len2);
System.arraycopy(tmpV, tmpBase, v, start, len2);
return;
}
if (len2 == 1) {
dest -= len1;
cursor1 -= len1;
System.arraycopy(a, cursor1 + 1, a, dest + 1, len1);
System.arraycopy(v, cursor1 + 1, v, dest + 1, len1);
a[dest] = tmp[cursor2];
v[dest] = tmpV[cursor2];
return;
}
final BooleanComparator c = this.c; // Use local variable for performance
int minGallop = this.minGallop; // " " " " "
outer:
while (true) {
int count1 = 0; // Number of times in a row that first run won
int count2 = 0; // Number of times in a row that second run won
/*
* Do the straightforward thing until (if ever) one run appears to win
* consistently.
*/
do {
assert len1 > 0 && len2 > 1;
if (c.compare(tmp[cursor2], a[cursor1]) < 0) {
a[dest] = a[cursor1];
v[dest--] = v[cursor1--];
++count1;
count2 = 0;
if (--len1 == 0)
break outer;
}
else {
a[dest] = tmp[cursor2];
v[dest--] = tmpV[cursor2--];
++count2;
count1 = 0;
if (--len2 == 1)
break outer;
}
}
while ((count1 | count2) < minGallop);
/*
* One run is winning so consistently that galloping may be a huge win. So
* try that, and continue galloping until (if ever) neither run appears to
* be winning consistently anymore.
*/
do {
assert len1 > 0 && len2 > 1;
count1 = len1 - gallopRight(tmp[cursor2], a, base1, len1, len1 - 1, c);
if (count1 != 0) {
dest -= count1;
cursor1 -= count1;
len1 -= count1;
System.arraycopy(a, cursor1 + 1, a, dest + 1, count1);
System.arraycopy(v, cursor1 + 1, v, dest + 1, count1);
if (len1 == 0)
break outer;
}
a[dest] = tmp[cursor2];
v[dest] = tmpV[cursor2];
if (--len2 == 1)
break outer;
count2 = len2 - gallopLeft(a[cursor1], tmp, tmpBase, len2, len2 - 1, c);
if (count2 != 0) {
dest -= count2;
cursor2 -= count2;
len2 -= count2;
System.arraycopy(tmp, cursor2 + 1, a, dest + 1, count2);
System.arraycopy(tmpV, cursor2 + 1, v, dest + 1, count2);
if (len2 <= 1) // len2 == 1 || len2 == 0
break outer;
}
a[dest] = a[cursor1];
v[dest] = v[cursor1];
if (--len1 == 0)
break outer;
--minGallop;
}
while (count1 >= MIN_GALLOP | count2 >= MIN_GALLOP);
if (minGallop < 0)
minGallop = 0;
minGallop += 2; // Penalize for leaving gallop mode
} // End of "outer" loop
this.minGallop = minGallop < 1 ? 1 : minGallop; // Write back to field
if (len2 == 1) {
assert len1 > 0;
dest -= len1;
cursor1 -= len1;
System.arraycopy(a, cursor1 + 1, a, dest + 1, len1);
System.arraycopy(v, cursor1 + 1, v, dest + 1, len1);
a[dest] = tmp[cursor2]; // Move first elt of run2 to front of merge
v[dest] = tmpV[cursor2]; // Move first elt of run2 to front of merge
}
else if (len2 == 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Comparison method violates its general contract!");
}
else {
assert len1 == 0;
assert len2 > 0;
final int start = dest - (len2 - 1);
System.arraycopy(tmp, tmpBase, a, start, len2);
System.arraycopy(tmpV, tmpBase, v, start, len2);
}
}
/**
* Ensures that the external array tmp has at least the specified number of
* elements, increasing its size if necessary. The size increases
* exponentially to ensure amortized linear time complexity.
*
* @param minCapacity the minimum required capacity of the tmp array
* @return tmp, whether or not it grew
*/
private boolean[] ensureCapacity(final int minCapacity) {
if (tmpLen < minCapacity) {
// Compute smallest power of 2 > minCapacity
int newSize = -1 >>> Integer.numberOfLeadingZeros(minCapacity);
++newSize;
if (newSize < 0) // Not bloody likely!
newSize = minCapacity;
else
newSize = Math.min(newSize, a.length >>> 1);
final boolean[] newArray = new boolean[newSize];
tmp = newArray;
tmpLen = newSize;
tmpBase = 0;
final Object[] newArrayV = new Object[newSize];
tmpV = newArrayV;
}
return tmp;
}
}