Many resources are needed to download a project. Please understand that we have to compensate our server costs. Thank you in advance. Project price only 1 $
You can buy this project and download/modify it how often you want.
/*
* Copyright (c) 2007 Mockito contributors
* This program is made available under the terms of the MIT License.
*/
package org.mockito;
import org.mockito.internal.MockitoCore;
import org.mockito.internal.creation.MockSettingsImpl;
import org.mockito.internal.debugging.MockitoDebuggerImpl;
import org.mockito.internal.stubbing.answers.*;
import org.mockito.internal.stubbing.defaultanswers.ReturnsEmptyValues;
import org.mockito.internal.stubbing.defaultanswers.ReturnsMoreEmptyValues;
import org.mockito.internal.verification.VerificationModeFactory;
import org.mockito.junit.MockitoJUnitRule;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import org.mockito.stubbing.*;
import org.mockito.verification.*;
/**
*
* Mockito library enables mocks creation, verification and stubbing.
*
* This javadoc content is also available on the http://mockito.org web page.
* All documentation is kept in javadocs because it guarantees consistency between what's on the web and what's in the source code.
* Also, it makes possible to access documentation straight from the IDE even if you work offline.
*
*
* Following examples mock a List, because everyone knows its interface (methods
* like add(), get(), clear() will be used).
* You probably wouldn't mock List class 'in real'.
*
*
*
*
*
* //You can mock concrete classes, not only interfaces
* LinkedList mockedList = mock(LinkedList.class);
*
* //stubbing
* when(mockedList.get(0)).thenReturn("first");
* when(mockedList.get(1)).thenThrow(new RuntimeException());
*
* //following prints "first"
* System.out.println(mockedList.get(0));
*
* //following throws runtime exception
* System.out.println(mockedList.get(1));
*
* //following prints "null" because get(999) was not stubbed
* System.out.println(mockedList.get(999));
*
* //Although it is possible to verify a stubbed invocation, usually it's just redundant
* //If your code cares what get(0) returns then something else breaks (often before even verify() gets executed).
* //If your code doesn't care what get(0) returns then it should not be stubbed. Not convinced? See here.
* verify(mockedList).get(0);
*
*
*
*
By default, for all methods that return value, mock returns null, an
* empty collection or appropriate primitive/primitive wrapper value (e.g: 0,
* false, ... for int/Integer, boolean/Boolean, ...).
*
*
Stubbing can be overridden: for example common stubbing can go to
* fixture setup but the test methods can override it.
* Please note that overridding stubbing is a potential code smell that points out too much stubbing
*
*
Once stubbed, the method will always return stubbed value regardless
* of how many times it is called.
*
*
Last stubbing is more important - when you stubbed the same method with
* the same arguments many times.
* Other words: the order of stubbing matters but it is only meaningful rarely,
* e.g. when stubbing exactly the same method calls or sometimes when argument matchers are used, etc.
*
* Mockito verifies argument values in natural java style: by using an equals() method.
* Sometimes, when extra flexibility is required then you might use argument matchers:
*
*
* //stubbing using built-in anyInt() argument matcher
* when(mockedList.get(anyInt())).thenReturn("element");
*
* //stubbing using hamcrest (let's say isValid() returns your own hamcrest matcher):
* when(mockedList.contains(argThat(isValid()))).thenReturn("element");
*
* //following prints "element"
* System.out.println(mockedList.get(999));
*
* //you can also verify using an argument matcher
* verify(mockedList).get(anyInt());
*
*
*
* Argument matchers allow flexible verification or stubbing.
* {@link Matchers Click here to see} more built-in matchers
* and examples of custom argument matchers / hamcrest matchers.
*
* For information solely on custom argument matchers check out javadoc for {@link ArgumentMatcher} class.
*
* Be reasonable with using complicated argument matching.
* The natural matching style using equals() with occasional anyX() matchers tend to give clean & simple tests.
* Sometimes it's just better to refactor the code to allow equals() matching or even implement equals() method to help out with testing.
*
* Also, read section 15 or javadoc for {@link ArgumentCaptor} class.
* {@link ArgumentCaptor} is a special implementation of an argument matcher that captures argument values for further assertions.
*
* Warning on argument matchers:
*
* If you are using argument matchers, all arguments have to be provided
* by matchers.
*
* E.g: (example shows verification but the same applies to stubbing):
*
*
* verify(mock).someMethod(anyInt(), anyString(), eq("third argument"));
* //above is correct - eq() is also an argument matcher
*
* verify(mock).someMethod(anyInt(), anyString(), "third argument");
* //above is incorrect - exception will be thrown because third argument is given without an argument matcher.
*
*
*
* Matcher methods like anyObject(), eq()do not return matchers.
* Internally, they record a matcher on a stack and return a dummy value (usually null).
* This implementation is due static type safety imposed by java compiler.
* The consequence is that you cannot use anyObject(), eq() methods outside of verified/stubbed method.
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Read more about doThrow|doAnswer family of methods in paragraph 12.
*
* Initially, {@link Mockito#stubVoid(Object)} was used for stubbing voids.
* Currently stubVoid() is deprecated in favor of {@link Mockito#doThrow(Throwable)}.
* This is because of improved readability and consistency with the family of {@link Mockito#doAnswer(Answer)} methods.
*
*
*
*
*
* // A. Single mock whose methods must be invoked in a particular order
* List singleMock = mock(List.class);
*
* //using a single mock
* singleMock.add("was added first");
* singleMock.add("was added second");
*
* //create an inOrder verifier for a single mock
* InOrder inOrder = inOrder(singleMock);
*
* //following will make sure that add is first called with "was added first, then with "was added second"
* inOrder.verify(singleMock).add("was added first");
* inOrder.verify(singleMock).add("was added second");
*
* // B. Multiple mocks that must be used in a particular order
* List firstMock = mock(List.class);
* List secondMock = mock(List.class);
*
* //using mocks
* firstMock.add("was called first");
* secondMock.add("was called second");
*
* //create inOrder object passing any mocks that need to be verified in order
* InOrder inOrder = inOrder(firstMock, secondMock);
*
* //following will make sure that firstMock was called before secondMock
* inOrder.verify(firstMock).add("was called first");
* inOrder.verify(secondMock).add("was called second");
*
* // Oh, and A + B can be mixed together at will
*
*
* Verification in order is flexible - you don't have to verify all
* interactions one-by-one but only those that you are interested in
* testing in order.
*
* Also, you can create InOrder object passing only mocks that are relevant for
* in-order verification.
*
*
*
*
*
* //using mocks - only mockOne is interacted
* mockOne.add("one");
*
* //ordinary verification
* verify(mockOne).add("one");
*
* //verify that method was never called on a mock
* verify(mockOne, never()).add("two");
*
* //verify that other mocks were not interacted
* verifyZeroInteractions(mockTwo, mockThree);
*
*
*
* A word of warning:
* Some users who did a lot of classic, expect-run-verify mocking tend to use verifyNoMoreInteractions() very often, even in every test method.
* verifyNoMoreInteractions() is not recommended to use in every test method.
* verifyNoMoreInteractions() is a handy assertion from the interaction testing toolkit. Use it only when it's relevant.
* Abusing it leads to overspecified, less maintainable tests. You can find further reading
* here.
*
*
* See also {@link Mockito#never()} - it is more explicit and
* communicates the intent well.
*
*
* Sometimes we need to stub with different return value/exception for the same
* method call. Typical use case could be mocking iterators.
* Original version of Mockito did not have this feature to promote simple mocking.
* For example, instead of iterators one could use {@link Iterable} or simply
* collections. Those offer natural ways of stubbing (e.g. using real
* collections). In rare scenarios stubbing consecutive calls could be useful,
* though:
*
*
* Allows stubbing with generic {@link Answer} interface.
*
* Yet another controversial feature which was not included in Mockito
* originally. We recommend using simple stubbing with thenReturn() or
* thenThrow() only. Those two should be just enough to test/test-drive
* any clean & simple code.
*
*
*
* Stubbing voids requires different approach from {@link Mockito#when(Object)} because the compiler does not
* like void methods inside brackets...
*
* {@link Mockito#doThrow(Throwable)} replaces the {@link Mockito#stubVoid(Object)} method for stubbing voids.
* The main reason is improved readability and consistency with the family of doAnswer() methods.
*
* Use doThrow() when you want to stub a void method with an exception:
*
* You can use doThrow(), doAnswer(), doNothing(), doReturn()
* and doCallRealMethod() in place of the corresponding call with when(), for any method.
* It is necessary when you
*
*
stub void methods
*
stub methods on spy objects (see below)
*
stub the same method more than once, to change the behaviour of a mock in the middle of a test.
*
* but you may prefer to use these methods in place of the alternative with when(), for all of your stubbing calls.
*
*
* You can create spies of real objects. When you use the spy then the real methods are called
* (unless a method was stubbed).
*
* Real spies should be used carefully and occasionally, for example when dealing with legacy code.
*
*
* Spying on real objects can be associated with "partial mocking" concept.
* Before the release 1.8, Mockito spies were not real partial mocks.
* The reason was we thought partial mock is a code smell.
* At some point we found legitimate use cases for partial mocks
* (3rd party interfaces, interim refactoring of legacy code, the full article is here)
*
*
*
* List list = new LinkedList();
* List spy = spy(list);
*
* //optionally, you can stub out some methods:
* when(spy.size()).thenReturn(100);
*
* //using the spy calls *real* methods
* spy.add("one");
* spy.add("two");
*
* //prints "one" - the first element of a list
* System.out.println(spy.get(0));
*
* //size() method was stubbed - 100 is printed
* System.out.println(spy.size());
*
* //optionally, you can verify
* verify(spy).add("one");
* verify(spy).add("two");
*
*
*
Important gotcha on spying real objects!
*
*
Sometimes it's impossible or impractical to use {@link Mockito#when(Object)} for stubbing spies.
* Therefore when using spies please consider doReturn|Answer|Throw() family of
* methods for stubbing. Example:
*
*
* List list = new LinkedList();
* List spy = spy(list);
*
* //Impossible: real method is called so spy.get(0) throws IndexOutOfBoundsException (the list is yet empty)
* when(spy.get(0)).thenReturn("foo");
*
* //You have to use doReturn() for stubbing
* doReturn("foo").when(spy).get(0);
*
*
*
*
Mockito *does not* delegate calls to the passed real instance, instead it actually creates a copy of it.
* So if you keep the real instance and interact with it, don't expect the spied to be aware of those interaction
* and their effect on real instance state.
* The corollary is that when an *unstubbed* method is called *on the spy* but *not on the real instance*,
* you won't see any effects on the real instance.
*
*
*
Watch out for final methods.
* Mockito doesn't mock final methods so the bottom line is: when you spy on real objects + you try to stub a final method = trouble.
* Also you won't be able to verify those method as well.
*
*
* You can create a mock with specified strategy for its return values.
* It's quite advanced feature and typically you don't need it to write decent tests.
* However, it can be helpful for working with legacy systems.
*
* It is the default answer so it will be used only when you don't stub the method call.
*
*
*
* Mockito verifies argument values in natural java style: by using an equals() method.
* This is also the recommended way of matching arguments because it makes tests clean & simple.
* In some situations though, it is helpful to assert on certain arguments after the actual verification.
* For example:
*
*
* Warning: it is recommended to use ArgumentCaptor with verification but not with stubbing.
* Using ArgumentCaptor with stubbing may decrease test readability because captor is created outside of assert (aka verify or 'then') block.
* Also it may reduce defect localization because if stubbed method was not called then no argument is captured.
*
* In a way ArgumentCaptor is related to custom argument matchers (see javadoc for {@link ArgumentMatcher} class).
* Both techniques can be used for making sure certain arguments where passed to mocks.
* However, ArgumentCaptor may be a better fit if:
*
*
custom argument matcher is not likely to be reused
*
you just need it to assert on argument values to complete verification
*
* Custom argument matchers via {@link ArgumentMatcher} are usually better for stubbing.
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Finally, after many internal debates & discussions on the mailing list, partial mock support was added to Mockito.
* Previously we considered partial mocks as code smells. However, we found a legitimate use case for partial mocks - more reading:
* here
*
* Before release 1.8spy() was not producing real partial mocks and it was confusing for some users.
* Read more about spying: here or in javadoc for {@link Mockito#spy(Object)} method.
*
*
* //you can create partial mock with spy() method:
* List list = spy(new LinkedList());
*
* //you can enable partial mock capabilities selectively on mocks:
* Foo mock = mock(Foo.class);
* //Be sure the real implementation is 'safe'.
* //If real implementation throws exceptions or depends on specific state of the object then you're in trouble.
* when(mock.someMethod()).thenCallRealMethod();
*
*
* As usual you are going to read the partial mock warning:
* Object oriented programming is more less tackling complexity by dividing the complexity into separate, specific, SRPy objects.
* How does partial mock fit into this paradigm? Well, it just doesn't...
* Partial mock usually means that the complexity has been moved to a different method on the same object.
* In most cases, this is not the way you want to design your application.
*
* However, there are rare cases when partial mocks come handy:
* dealing with code you cannot change easily (3rd party interfaces, interim refactoring of legacy code etc.)
* However, I wouldn't use partial mocks for new, test-driven & well-designed code.
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Smart Mockito users hardly use this feature because they know it could be a sign of poor tests.
* Normally, you don't need to reset your mocks, just create new mocks for each test method.
*
* Instead of reset() please consider writing simple, small and focused test methods over lengthy, over-specified tests.
* First potential code smell is reset() in the middle of the test method. This probably means you're testing too much.
* Follow the whisper of your test methods: "Please keep us small & focused on single behavior".
* There are several threads about it on mockito mailing list.
*
* The only reason we added reset() method is to
* make it possible to work with container-injected mocks.
* See issue 55 (here)
* or FAQ (here).
*
* Don't harm yourself.reset() in the middle of the test method is a code smell (you're probably testing too much).
*
* List mock = mock(List.class);
* when(mock.size()).thenReturn(10);
* mock.add(1);
*
* reset(mock);
* //at this point the mock forgot any interactions & stubbing
*
* Next, you should know that Mockito validates if you use it correctly all the time.
* However, there's a gotcha so please read the javadoc for {@link Mockito#validateMockitoUsage()}
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Behavior Driven Development style of writing tests uses //given //when //then comments as fundamental parts of your test methods.
* This is exactly how we write our tests and we warmly encourage you to do so!
*
* The problem is that current stubbing api with canonical role of when word does not integrate nicely with //given //when //then comments.
* It's because stubbing belongs to given component of the test and not to the when component of the test.
* Hence {@link BDDMockito} class introduces an alias so that you stub method calls with {@link BDDMockito#given(Object)} method.
* Now it really nicely integrates with the given component of a BDD style test!
*
*
* Mocks can be made serializable. With this feature you can use a mock in a place that requires dependencies to be serializable.
*
* WARNING: This should be rarely used in unit testing.
*
* The behaviour was implemented for a specific use case of a BDD spec that had an unreliable external dependency. This
* was in a web environment and the objects from the external dependency were being serialized to pass between layers.
*
* To create serializable mock use {@link MockSettings#serializable()}:
*
* List serializableMock = mock(List.class, withSettings().serializable());
*
* Making a real object spy serializable is a bit more effort as the spy(...) method does not have an overloaded version
* which accepts MockSettings. No worries, you will hardly ever use it.
*
*
* List<Object> list = new ArrayList<Object>();
* List<Object> spy = mock(ArrayList.class, withSettings()
* .spiedInstance(list)
* .defaultAnswer(CALLS_REAL_METHODS)
* .serializable());
*
* Release 1.8.3 brings new annotations that may be helpful on occasion:
*
*
*
@{@link Captor} simplifies creation of {@link ArgumentCaptor}
* - useful when the argument to capture is a nasty generic class and you want to avoid compiler warnings
*
@{@link Spy} - you can use it instead {@link Mockito#spy(Object)}.
*
@{@link InjectMocks} - injects mock or spy fields into tested object automatically.
*
*
*
* Note that @{@link InjectMocks} can also be used in combination with the @{@link Spy} annotation, it means
* that Mockito will inject mocks into the partial mock under test. This complexity is another good reason why you
* should only use partial mocks as a last resort. See point 16 about partial mocks.
*
*
* All new annotations are *only* processed on {@link MockitoAnnotations#initMocks(Object)}.
* Just like for @{@link Mock} annotation you can use the built-in runner: {@link MockitoJUnitRunner} or rule:
* {@link MockitoJUnitRule}.
*
* Allows verifying with timeout. It causes a verify to wait for a specified period of time for a desired
* interaction rather than fails immediately if had not already happened. May be useful for testing in concurrent
* conditions.
*
* It feels this feature should be used rarely - figure out a better way of testing your multi-threaded system.
*
* Not yet implemented to work with InOrder verification.
*
* Examples:
*
*
* //passes when someMethod() is called within given time span
* verify(mock, timeout(100)).someMethod();
* //above is an alias to:
* verify(mock, timeout(100).times(1)).someMethod();
*
* //passes when someMethod() is called *exactly* 2 times within given time span
* verify(mock, timeout(100).times(2)).someMethod();
*
* //passes when someMethod() is called *at least* 2 times within given time span
* verify(mock, timeout(100).atLeast(2)).someMethod();
*
* //verifies someMethod() within given time span using given verification mode
* //useful only if you have your own custom verification modes.
* verify(mock, new Timeout(100, yourOwnVerificationMode)).someMethod();
*
* Mockito will now try to instantiate @{@link Spy} and will instantiate @{@link InjectMocks} fields
* using constructor injection, setter injection, or field injection.
*
* To take advantage of this feature you need to use {@link MockitoAnnotations#initMocks(Object)}, {@link MockitoJUnitRunner}
* or {@link MockitoJUnitRule}.
*
* Read more about available tricks and the rules of injection in the javadoc for {@link InjectMocks}
*
* //instead:
* @Spy BeerDrinker drinker = new BeerDrinker();
* //you can write:
* @Spy BeerDrinker drinker;
*
* //same applies to @InjectMocks annotation:
* @InjectMocks LocalPub;
*
* Mockito will now allow you to create mocks when stubbing.
* Basically, it allows to create a stub in one line of code.
* This can be helpful to keep test code clean.
* For example, some boring stub can be created & stubbed at field initialization in a test:
*
* public class CarTest {
* Car boringStubbedCar = when(mock(Car.class).shiftGear()).thenThrow(EngineNotStarted.class).getMock();
*
* @Test public void should... {}
*
* Mockito will now allow to ignore stubbing for the sake of verification.
* Sometimes useful when coupled with verifyNoMoreInteractions() or verification inOrder().
* Helps avoiding redundant verification of stubbed calls - typically we're not interested in verifying stubs.
*
* Warning, ignoreStubs() might lead to overuse of verifyNoMoreInteractions(ignoreStubs(...));
* Bear in mind that Mockito does not recommend bombarding every test with verifyNoMoreInteractions()
* for the reasons outlined in javadoc for {@link Mockito#verifyNoMoreInteractions(Object...)}
*
* Both the {@link MockingDetails#isMock} and {@link MockingDetails#isSpy()} methods return boolean.
* As a spy is just a different kind of mock, isMock() returns true if the object is a spy.
* In future Mockito versions MockingDetails may grow and provide other useful information about the mock,
* e.g. invocations, stubbing info, etc.
*
*
*
*
*
Useful for spies or partial mocks of objects that are difficult to mock or spy using the usual spy API.
* Since Mockito 1.10.11, the delegate may or may not be of the same type as the mock.
* If the type is different, a matching method needs to be found on delegate type otherwise an exception is thrown.
*
* Possible use cases for this feature:
*
*
Final classes but with an interface
*
Already custom proxied object
*
Special objects with a finalize method, i.e. to avoid executing it 2 times
*
*
*
The difference with the regular spy:
*
*
* The regular spy ({@link #spy(Object)}) contains all state from the spied instance
* and the methods are invoked on the spy. The spied instance is only used at mock creation to copy the state from.
* If you call a method on a regular spy and it internally calls other methods on this spy, those calls are remembered
* for verifications, and they can be effectively stubbed.
*
*
* The mock that delegates simply delegates all methods to the delegate.
* The delegate is used all the time as methods are delegated onto it.
* If you call a method on a mock that delegates and it internally calls other methods on this mock,
* those calls are not remembered for verifications, stubbing does not have effect on them, too.
* Mock that delegates is less powerful than the regular spy but it is useful when the regular spy cannot be created.
*
*
*
*
* See more information in docs for {@link AdditionalAnswers#delegatesTo(Object)}.
*
*
*
*
*
Driven by requirements and patches from Google Android guys Mockito now offers an extension point
* that allows replacing the proxy generation engine. By default, Mockito uses cglib to create dynamic proxies.
*
The extension point is for advanced users that want to extend Mockito. For example, it is now possible
* to use Mockito for Android testing with a help of dexmaker.
*
For more details, motivations and examples please refer to
* the docs for {@link org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker}.
*
*
*
*
*
*
* It is now possible to conveniently spy on abstract classes. Note that overusing spies hints at code design smells (see {@link #spy(Object)}).
*
* Previously, spying was only possible on instances of objects.
* New API makes it possible to use constructor when creating an instance of the mock.
* This is particularly useful for mocking abstract classes because the user is no longer required to provide an instance of the abstract class.
* At the moment, only parameter-less constructor is supported, let us know if it is not enough.
*
*
*
* For more information please see {@link MockSettings#useConstructor()}.
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public class Mockito extends Matchers {
static final MockitoCore MOCKITO_CORE = new MockitoCore();
/**
* The default Answer of every mock if the mock was not stubbed.
* Typically it just returns some empty value.
*
* {@link Answer} can be used to define the return values of unstubbed invocations.
*
* This implementation first tries the global configuration.
* If there is no global configuration then it uses {@link ReturnsEmptyValues} (returns zeros, empty collections, nulls, etc.)
*/
public static final Answer
*
*
* Verification only works with the last mock in the chain. You can use verification modes.
*
* when(person.getAddress(anyString()).getStreet().getName()).thenReturn("deep");
* when(person.getAddress(anyString()).getStreet(Locale.ITALIAN).getName()).thenReturn("deep");
* when(person.getAddress(anyString()).getStreet(Locale.CHINESE).getName()).thenReturn("deep");
*
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet().getName();
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet().getLongName();
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(Locale.ITALIAN).getName();
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(Locale.CHINESE).getName();
*
* // note that we are actually referring to the very last mock in the stubbing chain.
* InOrder inOrder = inOrder(
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(),
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(Locale.CHINESE),
* person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(Locale.ITALIAN)
* );
* inOrder.verify(person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(), times(1)).getName();
* inOrder.verify(person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet()).getLongName();
* inOrder.verify(person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(Locale.ITALIAN), atLeast(1)).getName();
* inOrder.verify(person.getAddress("the docks").getStreet(Locale.CHINESE)).getName();
*
* This feature will not work when any return type of methods included in the chain cannot be mocked
* (for example: is a primitive or a final class). This is because of java type system.
*
