record_2.0.peer-review-2.0.xsd Maven / Gradle / Ivy
Go to download
Show more of this group Show more artifacts with this name
Show all versions of orcid-model Show documentation
Show all versions of orcid-model Show documentation
Container for all classes that will be used to marshal and unmarshal XML/JSON from the API
The newest version!
=============================================================================
ORCID (R) Open Source
http://orcid.org
Copyright (c) 2012-2014 ORCID,
Inc.
Licensed under an MIT-Style License (MIT)
http://orcid.org/open-source-license
This copyright and license
information (including a link to the full
license)
shall be included in
its entirety in all copies or substantial portion of
the software.
=============================================================================
The schema describes the message format used for ORCID API requests
and responses.
The top level element is orcid-message.
Schematron validation
The role played by a person in their
contribution to a review.
Unique identifier(s) of the review. This identifier refers to the review itself, NOT to the item that was reviewed. At least one identifier is required. In the case where there is no persistent unique identifier for the review, the source providing the data should generate a locally-sourced unique identifier for the review (e.g., type "organization-defined-type"). This field will be checked when adding new reviews to prevent double counting of review activity.
A link to a representation of the review on the web. This URL refers to the review itself, NOT to the item that was reviewed.
The kind of review applied to the subject type
reviewed
The date on which the review was completed. Allowable values: yyyy; yyyy-mm; yyyy-mm-dd, formatted using the ORCID fuzzy date format.
Identifier for the group that this review should be a part of for aggregation purposes
The unique identifier of the subject being
reviewed.
The name of the journal, conference, grant review panel, or other applicable object of which the review subject was a part.
The type of object that the review subject is (for example, a journal article, grant, etc).
The name/title of the subject object that was reviewed.
The URL of the subject object that was reviewed.
Information about the organization convening the review (journal publisher, conference organizer, funding agency, etc). Whenever possible, this organization is identified by a unique identifier like the Ringgold ID or FundRef ID.
The unique generated identifier of the review.
The date on which the review was completed. Allowable values: yyyy; yyyy-mm; yyyy-mm-dd, formatted using the ORCID fuzzy date format.
Identifier for the group that this review should be a part of for aggregation purposes
Information about the organization convening the review (journal publisher, conference organizer, funding agency, etc). Whenever possible, this organization is identified by a unique identifier like the Ringgold ID or FundRef ID.
The role performed reviewer
A person who formally assess or examines an
output with a view to
commenting and evaluating it.
A person who coordinates reviews and/or is
responsible for decision making on the content of a publication.
A person participating in a process, committee or
activity.
A person who coordinates reviews and/or is
responsible for decision making on the content of a conference.
A person who makes arrangements or preparations
for an event or activity.
The role performed reviewer
An expert assessment of a scholarly output that
contributes to a decision regarding on the object of the review.
A postpeer review, expert evaluation of a
scholarly output.