Many resources are needed to download a project. Please understand that we have to compensate our server costs. Thank you in advance. Project price only 1 $
You can buy this project and download/modify it how often you want.
The following classes implement theory specific rewriting rules:
- bool_rewriter
- arith_rewriter
- bv_rewriter
- array_rewriter
- datatype_rewriter
- fpa_rewriter
- seq_rewriter
Each of them provide the method
br_status mk_app_core(func_decl * f, unsigned num_args, expr * const * args, expr_ref & result)
where
- f is expected to be a func_decl of the given theory
- If the return value if different from BR_FAILED, the result is stored in result.
The template rewriter_tpl can be instantiated to implement
rewriters that traverse ASTs applying some kind of transformation/simplification.
The parameter Cfg is expected to be a class with the following methods:
bool cache_all_results() const;
bool cache_results() const;
bool flat_assoc(func_decl * f) const;
bool rewrite_patterns() const;
bool max_scopes_exceeded(unsigned num_scopes) const;
bool max_frames_exceeded(unsigned num_frames) const;
bool max_steps_exceeded(unsigned num_steps) const;
bool pre_visit(expr * t);
br_status reduce_app(func_decl * f, unsigned num, expr * const * args, expr_ref & result, proof_ref & result_pr);
bool reduce_quantifier(quantifier * old_q,
expr * new_body,
expr * const * new_patterns,
expr * const * new_no_patterns,
expr_ref & result,
proof_ref & result_pr);
bool get_macro(func_decl * d, expr * & def, quantifier * & q, proof * & def_pr);
bool get_subst(expr * s, expr * & t, proof * & t_pr);
void reset();
void cleanup();
The class default_rewriter_cfg provides a default implementation for these methods.
The method reduce_app is the most important one. When implementing new rewriter,
we usually redefine this method.
We should return BR_FAILED, if we do not want to apply a "simplification" to
(f args[0] ... args[num-1])
This is very important for performance reasons, since the rewriter tries to
reuse AST when BR_FAILED is returned.
If one wants to simply (f args[0] ... args[num-1]) to t, then use:
result = t;
return BR_DONE;
Sometimes, by applying a simplification rule we may create new opportunites for
rewriting. One can instruct the rewriter to revisit the result by returning:
BR_REWRITE1, // rewrite the result (bounded by depth 1)
BR_REWRITE2, // rewrite the result (bounded by depth 2)
BR_REWRITE3, // rewrite the result (bounded by depth 3)
BR_REWRITE_FULL, // rewrite the result unbounded
Example:
Suppose one wants to implement the rewriting rule
(= (ite c t e) v) --> (ite c (= t v) (= e v))
This rule may create new opportunites for simplification since
it creates the equalities (= t v) and (= e v).
So, to force the rewriter to process these new equalities,
BR_REWRITE2 should be returned.
It is also correct (but unnecessary) to return BR_REWRITE3 and BR_REWRITE_FULL.
To instantiate a new rewriter, one should
1) Define a new configuration class.
class mycfg : public default_rewriter_cfg {
...
}
2) Force template instantiation using the new cfg.
templace class rewriter_tpl;
3) Define a subclass of rewriter_tpl that
owns the new cfg.
class myrewriter : public rewriter_tpl {
mycfg m_cfg;
public:
myrewriter(ast_manager & m):
rewriter_tpl(m, m.proofs_enabled(), m_cfg),
m_cfg(...) {
}
};
The rewriter_tpl template supports proof production.
It can be disabled even when proof productions is
enabled in the ast_manager.
Examples of rewriter_tpl instances:
- th_rewriter.cpp
- assertion_set_bit_blaster.cpp
- model_evaluator.cpp
- elim_distinct.cpp
Notes for additional Cfg methods:
- bool rewrite_patterns() const;
If false is returned, then the rewriter will ignore patterns.
- bool pre_visit(expr * t);
If false is returned, then the rewriter will not process t.
This is very useful, for example, for implementing rewriters that will only
"process" the Boolean skeleton.
- bool max_steps_exceeded(unsigned num_steps) const;
If false, it interrupts the execution of the rewriter.
The interruption is performed by throwing an exception.
One can also used this callback to check whether the
amount of memory used is still reasonable.
- bool cache_all_results() const;
By default, the rewriter only caches the results of
non-atomic shared ASTs (get_ref_count() > 1). If true,
is returned, the rewriter will cache all intermediate results.
- bool flat_assoc(func_decl * f) const;
If true is returned, then the rewriter will do flattening of
non-shared nodes. For example,
(+ a (+ b (+ c d)))
will be treated as (+ a b c d)
Shared nodes are not considered. Thus, exponential blowup
in the rewriter stack is avoided.
So, when implementing
br_status reduce_app(func_decl * f, unsigned num, expr * const * args, expr_ref & result, proof_ref & result_pr);
one should not assume that for an associative f, there is not
f-application in args when true is returned by flat_assoc.
when implementing
br_status reduce_app(func_decl * f, unsigned num, expr * const * args, expr_ref & result, proof_ref & result_pr);
If result_pr is set to 0, and proofs are enabled, then the rewriter will use a generic
"rewrite" proof step for justifying that (f args[0] ... args[num-1]) is equal to result.
The th_rewriter takes care of flattening. So, in principle, there is
not need to return true in flat_assoc.
