Download JAR files tagged by arguments with all dependencies

This is a Java library which provides a flexible and customizable way to bind command line arguments to Java objects, in a similar manner to how JSON, XML, and YAML can be bound to Java objects. You can easily define Java classes that represent the data structure of your command line arguments, and use annotations to specify how those arguments should be parsed and bound to the corresponding fields in your Java object. This allows you to write command line interfaces that are more intuitive and easier to use, while also reducing the amount of boilerplate code that is needed to parse and validate command line arguments.

Skeletal implementation of interface javax.lang.model.util.Types, plus concrete realization backed by core Java Reflection API, akin to JEP 119. This module implements those methods in interface javax.lang.model.util.Types that pertain to the Java type system, plus it provides a method for resolving formal type parameters to actual type arguments. These methods have no equivalent in the Java Reflection API. The abstract skeletal implementation in this module is meant to be specialized for a particular javax.lang.model implementation. The abstraction makes this module well-suited to be used in projects that contain javax.lang.model as part of their domain model (for instance, implementations of alternative languages on top of the JVM).

This module contains a more general approach to construct AlignmentAlgorithms by relying on the theoretical concept of Algebraic Dynamic Programming (ADP) as developed by Giegerich et al. ADP defines four ingredients for an alignment algorithm: 1.) A signature that defines the permitted alignment operations. Operations are just function templates with an associated arity, meaning the number of arguments it takes from the left sequence and from the right sequence. In the TCSAlignmentToolbox we have a fixed signature with the following operations: REPLACEMENT(1, 1), DELETION(1, 0), INSERTION(0, 1), SKIPDELETION(1, 0) and SKIPINSERTION(0, 1) 2.) A regular tree grammar that produces alignments, that is: sequences of operations, in a restricted fashion. 3.) An algebra that can translate such trees to a cost. In the TCSAlignmentToolbox this is a Comparator. 4.) A choice function, in case of the TCSAlignmentToolbox: the strict minimum or the soft minimum. An alignment algorithm in the TCSAlignmentToolbox sense of the word then is the combination of choice function and grammar. While we provide hardcoded versions of these combinations in the main package, the adp package allows you to create your own grammars. You can combine them with a choice function by instantiating one of the Algorithm classes provided in this package with a grammar of your choice. For example: AlignmentAlgorithm algo = new SoftADPScoreAlgorithm(my_grammar, comparator); creates an alignment algorithm that implicitly produces all possible alignments your grammar can construct with the given input, translates them to a cost using the algebra/comparator you provided and applies the soft minimum to return the score. This all gets efficient by dynamic programming. Note that there is runtime overhead when using this method in comparison with the hardcoded algorithms. But for complicated grammars this is a much easier way to go. For more information on the theory, please refer to my master's thesis: "Adaptive Affine Sequence Alignment using Algebraic Dynamic Programming"

Pact provider ============= sub project of https://github.com/DiUS/pact-jvm The pact provider is responsible for verifying that an API provider adheres to a number of pacts authored by its clients This library provides the basic tools required to automate the process, and should be usable on its own in many instances. Framework and build tool specific bindings will be provided in separate libraries that build on top of this core functionality. ### Running Pacts Main takes 2 arguments: The first is the root folder of your pact files (all .json files in root and subfolders are assumed to be pacts) The second is the location of your pact config json file. ### Pact config The pact config is a simple mapping of provider names to endpoint url's paths will be appended to endpoint url's when interactions are attempted for an example see: https://github.com/DiUS/pact-jvm/blob/master/pact-jvm-provider/src/test/resources/pact-config.json ### Provider State Before each interaction is executed, the provider under test will have the opportunity to enter a state. Generally the state maps to a set of fixture data for mocking out services that the provider is a consumer of (they will have their own pacts) The pact framework will instruct the test server to enter that state by sending: POST "${config.stateChangeUrl.url}/setup" { "state" : "${interaction.stateName}" } ### An example of running provider verification with junit This example uses java, junit and hamcrest matchers to run the provider verification. As the provider service is a DropWizard application, it uses the DropwizardAppRule to startup the service before running any test. Warning: It only grabs the first interaction from the pact file with the consumer, where there could be many. (This could possibly be solved with a parameterized test) ```java public class PactJVMProviderJUnitTest { @ClassRule public static TestRule startServiceRule = new DropwizardAppRule<DropwizardAppConfig>(DropwizardApp.class, "config.yml"); private static ProviderInfo serviceProvider; private static Pact testConsumerPact; @BeforeClass public static void setupProvider() { serviceProvider = new ProviderInfo("Dropwizard App"); serviceProvider.setProtocol("http"); serviceProvider.setHost("localhost"); serviceProvider.setPort(8080); serviceProvider.setPath("/"); ConsumerInfo consumer = new ConsumerInfo(); consumer.setName("test_consumer"); consumer.setPactFile(new File("target/pacts/ping_client-ping_service.json")); // serviceProvider.getConsumers().add(consumer); testConsumerPact = (Pact) new PactReader().loadPact(consumer.getPactFile()); } @Test @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public void runConsumerPacts() { //grab the first interaction from the pact with consumer List<Interaction> interactions = scala.collection.JavaConversions.seqAsJavaList(testConsumerPact.interactions()); Interaction interaction1 = interactions.get(0); //setup any provider state //setup the client and interaction to fire against the provider ProviderClient client = new ProviderClient(); client.setProvider(serviceProvider); client.setRequest(interaction1.request()); Map<String, Object> clientResponse = (Map<String, Object>) client.makeRequest(); Map<String, Object> result = (Map<String, Object>) ResponseComparison.compareResponse(interaction1.response(), clientResponse, (int) clientResponse.get("statusCode"), (Map) clientResponse.get("headers"), (String) clientResponse.get("data")); //assert all good assertThat(result.get("method"), is(true)); // method type matches Map headers = (Map) result.get("headers"); //headers match headers.forEach( (k, v) -> assertThat(format("Header: [%s] does not match", k), v, org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo(true)) ); assertThat((Collection<Object>)((Map)result.get("body")).values(), org.hamcrest.Matchers.hasSize(0)); // empty list of body mismatches } } ``` ### An example of running provider verification with spock This example uses groovy and spock to run the provider verification. Again the provider service is a DropWizard application, and is using the DropwizardAppRule to startup the service. This example runs all interactions using spocks Unroll feature ```groovy class PactJVMProviderSpockSpec extends Specification { @ClassRule @Shared TestRule startServiceRule = new DropwizardAppRule<DropwizardAppConfig>(DropwizardApp.class, "config.yml"); @Shared ProviderInfo serviceProvider @Shared Pact testConsumerPact def setupSpec() { serviceProvider = new ProviderInfo("Dropwizard App") serviceProvider.protocol = "http" serviceProvider.host = "localhost" serviceProvider.port = 8080; serviceProvider.path = "/" def consumer = serviceProvider.hasPactWith("ping_consumer", { pactFile = new File('target/pacts/ping_client-ping_service.json') }) testConsumerPact = (Pact) new PactReader().loadPact(consumer.getPactFile()); } def cleanup() { //cleanup provider state //ie. db.truncateAllTables() } def cleanupSpec() { //cleanup provider } @Unroll def "Provider Pact - With Consumer"() { given: //setup provider state // ie. db.setupRecords() // serviceProvider.requestFilter = { req -> // req.addHeader('Authorization', token) // } when: ProviderClient client = new ProviderClient(provider: serviceProvider, request: interaction.request()) Map clientResponse = (Map) client.makeRequest() Map result = (Map) ResponseComparison.compareResponse(interaction.response(), clientResponse, clientResponse.statusCode, clientResponse.headers, clientResponse.data) then: // method matches result.method == true // headers all match, spock needs the size checked before // asserting each result if (result.headers.size() > 0) { result.headers.each() { k, v -> assert v == true } } // empty list of body mismatches result.body.size() == 0 where: interaction << scala.collection.JavaConversions.seqAsJavaList(testConsumerPact.interactions()) } } ```