Download JAR files tagged by difference with all dependencies

Keystone project is a bootstrap that loads your application and its dependencies from a single archive. With his maven plugin and few line of configuration, your application will be available with all his dependencies in a single archive. The four main ideas which make the difference with other solution are: 1. all dependencies are not exploded in final archive, 'jar' file stay without any modification, so manifest also... 2. use our maven plugin to package all that you need (and we'll loading dependencies automatically for you) 3. you could load native library 4. you could restart your application Why named Keystone? 1. Stone wedge-shaped arch which maintains a vault [Architecture]. 2. A central element on which everything depends.

This metaclassifier makes its base classifier cost-sensitive using the method specified in Pedro Domingos: MetaCost: A general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive. In: Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 155-164, 1999. This classifier should produce similar results to one created by passing the base learner to Bagging, which is in turn passed to a CostSensitiveClassifier operating on minimum expected cost. The difference is that MetaCost produces a single cost-sensitive classifier of the base learner, giving the benefits of fast classification and interpretable output (if the base learner itself is interpretable). This implementation uses all bagging iterations when reclassifying training data (the MetaCost paper reports a marginal improvement when only those iterations containing each training instance are used in reclassifying that instance).

YET ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION OF LEVENSHTEIN DISTANCE GenericLevenshtein is an implementation of Minimum Edit Distance, also called Levenshtein Distance, written by Ramon Ziai and Niels Ott. This algorithm is very popular and it is often used to compute the similarity of strings. The difference in the presented implementation is that it can operate on sequences of any Java object implementing equals(Object). So no matter if you want to compare genome sequences or sequences of numbers, or just strings, here you go! Furthermore, the costs of the replace, insert, and delete operations can be customized by implementing the simple WeightCalculator<T> interface. In that case it is not a requirement to rely on equals(Object) as your implementation can do whatever you like it to do in oder to compare objects.

This subproject is an extension of the Struts tag library. Each JSP custom tag in this library is a subclass of an associated tag in the Struts tag library. One difference is that this tag library does not use "rtexprvalues", it uses the expression evaluation engine in the Jakarta Taglibs implementation of the JSP Standard Tag Library (version 1.0) to evaluate attribute values. In addition, some of the Struts tags were not ported to this library, as it was determined that their functionality was entirely supplied by the JSTL. These particular Struts tags, and the reason for their non-porting will be described in the documentation for this library. In order to fully understand the correct utilization of this library, you must understand the use and operation of the Struts tag library, and the use and operation of the JavaServer Pages Standard Tag Library (hereafter called the "JSTL"), along with the expression language (sometimes called the "EL") used for evaluating attribute values.

Races the cross validation error of competing attribute subsets. Use in conjuction with a ClassifierSubsetEval. RaceSearch has four modes: forward selection races all single attribute additions to a base set (initially no attributes), selects the winner to become the new base set and then iterates until there is no improvement over the base set. Backward elimination is similar but the initial base set has all attributes included and races all single attribute deletions. Schemata search is a bit different. Each iteration a series of races are run in parallel. Each race in a set determines whether a particular attribute should be included or not---ie the race is between the attribute being "in" or "out". The other attributes for this race are included or excluded randomly at each point in the evaluation. As soon as one race has a clear winner (ie it has been decided whether a particular attribute should be inor not) then the next set of races begins, using the result of the winning race from the previous iteration as new base set. Rank race first ranks the attributes using an attribute evaluator and then races the ranking. The race includes no attributes, the top ranked attribute, the top two attributes, the top three attributes, etc. It is also possible to generate a raked list of attributes through the forward racing process. If generateRanking is set to true then a complete forward race will be run---that is, racing continues until all attributes have been selected. The order that they are added in determines a complete ranking of all the attributes. Racing uses paired and unpaired t-tests on cross-validation errors of competing subsets. When there is a significant difference between the means of the errors of two competing subsets then the poorer of the two can be eliminated from the race. Similarly, if there is no significant difference between the mean errors of two competing subsets and they are within some threshold of each other, then one can be eliminated from the race.

# pact-jvm-consumer-java8 Provides a Java8 lambda based DSL for use with Junit to build consumer tests. # A Lambda DSL for Pact This is an extension for the pact DSL provided by [pact-jvm-consumer](../pact-jvm-consumer). The difference between the default pact DSL and this lambda DSL is, as the name suggests, the usage of lambdas. The use of lambdas makes the code much cleaner. ## Why a new DSL implementation? The lambda DSL solves the following two main issues. Both are visible in the following code sample: ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() # open an array .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .numberValue(1) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .numberValue(2) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .object() # now we work with an object .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for objects .closeObject() # close the object and we&apos;re back in the array .closeArray() # close the array ``` ### The existing DSL is quite error-prone Methods may only be called in certain states. For example `object()` may only be called when you&apos;re currently working on an array whereas `object(name)` is only allowed to be called when working on an object. But both of the methods are available. You&apos;ll find out at runtime if you&apos;re using the correct method. Finally, the need for opening and closing objects and arrays makes usage cumbersome. The lambda DSL has no ambiguous methods and there&apos;s no need to close objects and arrays as all the work on such an object is wrapped in a lamda call. ### The existing DSL is hard to read When formatting your source code with an IDE the code becomes hard to read as there&apos;s no indentation possible. Of course, you could do it by hand but we want auto formatting! Auto formatting works great for the new DSL! ```java array.object((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); # an attribute o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); # an attribute o.object(&quot;tar&quot;, (tarObject) -&gt; { # an attribute with a nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;a&quot;, &quot;A&quot;); # attribute of the nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;b&quot;, &quot;B&quot;); # attribute of the nested object }) }); ``` ## Installation ### Maven ``` &lt;dependency&gt; &lt;groupId&gt;au.com.dius&lt;/groupId&gt; &lt;artifactId&gt;pact-jvm-consumer-java8_2.12&lt;/artifactId&gt; &lt;version&gt;${pact.version}&lt;/version&gt; &lt;/dependency&gt; ``` ## Usage Start with a static import of `LambdaDsl`. This class contains factory methods for the lambda dsl extension. When you come accross the `body()` method of `PactDslWithProvider` builder start using the new extensions. The call to `LambdaDsl` replaces the call to instance `new PactDslJsonArray()` and `new PactDslJsonBody()` of the pact library. ```java io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.* ``` ### Response body as json array ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonArray; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonArray((a) -&gt; { a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;); a.stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Response body as json object ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonBody; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Examples #### Simple Json object When creating simple json structures the difference between the two approaches isn&apos;t big. ##### JSON ```json { &quot;bar&quot;: &quot;Bar&quot;, &quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot; } ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonBody() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;) ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build(); ``` #### An array of arrays When we come to more complex constructs with arrays and nested objects the beauty of lambdas become visible! ##### JSON ```json [ [&quot;a1&quot;, &quot;a2&quot;], [1, 2], [{&quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot;}] ] ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) .closeArray() .array() .numberValue(1) .numberValue(2) .closeArray() .array() .object() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .closeObject() .closeArray(); ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonArray((rootArray) -&gt; { rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;).stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.numberValue(1).numberValue(2)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.object((o) -&gt; o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;))); }).build(); ``` `object` is a reserved word in Kotlin. To allow using the DSL without escaping, a Kotlin extension `newObject` is available: ```kotlin newJsonArray { rootArray -&gt; rootArray.array { a -&gt; a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;).stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) } rootArray.array { a -&gt; a.numberValue(1).numberValue(2) } rootArray.array { a -&gt; a.newObject { o -&gt; o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) } } }.build(); ```

# pact-jvm-consumer-java8 Provides a Java8 lambda based DSL for use with Junit to build consumer tests. # A Lambda DSL for Pact This is an extension for the pact DSL provided by [pact-jvm-consumer](../pact-jvm-consumer). The difference between the default pact DSL and this lambda DSL is, as the name suggests, the usage of lambdas. The use of lambdas makes the code much cleaner. ## Why a new DSL implementation? The lambda DSL solves the following two main issues. Both are visible in the following code sample: ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() # open an array .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .numberValue(1) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .numberValue(2) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .object() # now we work with an object .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for objects .closeObject() # close the object and we&apos;re back in the array .closeArray() # close the array ``` ### The existing DSL is quite error-prone Methods may only be called in certain states. For example `object()` may only be called when you&apos;re currently working on an array whereas `object(name)` is only allowed to be called when working on an object. But both of the methods are available. You&apos;ll find out at runtime if you&apos;re using the correct method. Finally, the need for opening and closing objects and arrays makes usage cumbersome. The lambda DSL has no ambiguous methods and there&apos;s no need to close objects and arrays as all the work on such an object is wrapped in a lamda call. ### The existing DSL is hard to read When formatting your source code with an IDE the code becomes hard to read as there&apos;s no indentation possible. Of course, you could do it by hand but we want auto formatting! Auto formatting works great for the new DSL! ```java array.object((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); # an attribute o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); # an attribute o.object(&quot;tar&quot;, (tarObject) -&gt; { # an attribute with a nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;a&quot;, &quot;A&quot;); # attribute of the nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;b&quot;, &quot;B&quot;); # attribute of the nested object }) }); ``` ## Installation ### Maven ``` &lt;dependency&gt; &lt;groupId&gt;au.com.dius&lt;/groupId&gt; &lt;artifactId&gt;pact-jvm-consumer-java8_2.12&lt;/artifactId&gt; &lt;version&gt;${pact.version}&lt;/version&gt; &lt;/dependency&gt; ``` ## Usage Start with a static import of `LambdaDsl`. This class contains factory methods for the lambda dsl extension. When you come accross the `body()` method of `PactDslWithProvider` builder start using the new extensions. The call to `LambdaDsl` replaces the call to instance `new PactDslJsonArray()` and `new PactDslJsonBody()` of the pact library. ```java io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.* ``` ### Response body as json array ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonArray; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonArray((a) -&gt; { a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;); a.stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Response body as json object ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonBody; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Examples #### Simple Json object When creating simple json structures the difference between the two approaches isn&apos;t big. ##### JSON ```json { &quot;bar&quot;: &quot;Bar&quot;, &quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot; } ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonBody() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;) ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build(); ``` #### An array of arrays When we come to more complex constructs with arrays and nested objects the beauty of lambdas become visible! ##### JSON ```json [ [&quot;a1&quot;, &quot;a2&quot;], [1, 2], [{&quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot;}] ] ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) .closeArray() .array() .numberValue(1) .numberValue(2) .closeArray() .array() .object() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .closeObject() .closeArray(); ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonArray((rootArray) -&gt; { rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;).stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.numberValue(1).numberValue(2)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.object((o) -&gt; o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;))); }).build(); ``` ##### Kotlin Lambda DSL ```kotlin newJsonArray { newArray { stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) } newArray { numberValue(1) numberValue(2) } newArray { newObject { stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) } } } ```

# pact-jvm-consumer-java8 Provides a Java8 lambda based DSL for use with Junit to build consumer tests. # A Lambda DSL for Pact This is an extension for the pact DSL provided by [pact-jvm-consumer](../pact-jvm-consumer). The difference between the default pact DSL and this lambda DSL is, as the name suggests, the usage of lambdas. The use of lambdas makes the code much cleaner. ## Why a new DSL implementation? The lambda DSL solves the following two main issues. Both are visible in the following code sample: ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() # open an array .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .numberValue(1) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .numberValue(2) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .object() # now we work with an object .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for objects .closeObject() # close the object and we&apos;re back in the array .closeArray() # close the array ``` ### The existing DSL is quite error-prone Methods may only be called in certain states. For example `object()` may only be called when you&apos;re currently working on an array whereas `object(name)` is only allowed to be called when working on an object. But both of the methods are available. You&apos;ll find out at runtime if you&apos;re using the correct method. Finally, the need for opening and closing objects and arrays makes usage cumbersome. The lambda DSL has no ambiguous methods and there&apos;s no need to close objects and arrays as all the work on such an object is wrapped in a lamda call. ### The existing DSL is hard to read When formatting your source code with an IDE the code becomes hard to read as there&apos;s no indentation possible. Of course, you could do it by hand but we want auto formatting! Auto formatting works great for the new DSL! ```java array.object((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); # an attribute o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); # an attribute o.object(&quot;tar&quot;, (tarObject) -&gt; { # an attribute with a nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;a&quot;, &quot;A&quot;); # attribute of the nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;b&quot;, &quot;B&quot;); # attribute of the nested object }) }); ``` ## Installation ### Maven ``` &lt;dependency&gt; &lt;groupId&gt;au.com.dius&lt;/groupId&gt; &lt;artifactId&gt;pact-jvm-consumer-java8_2.12&lt;/artifactId&gt; &lt;version&gt;${pact.version}&lt;/version&gt; &lt;/dependency&gt; ``` ## Usage Start with a static import of `LambdaDsl`. This class contains factory methods for the lambda dsl extension. When you come accross the `body()` method of `PactDslWithProvider` builder start using the new extensions. The call to `LambdaDsl` replaces the call to instance `new PactDslJsonArray()` and `new PactDslJsonBody()` of the pact library. ```java io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.* ``` ### Response body as json array ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonArray; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonArray((a) -&gt; { a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;); a.stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Response body as json object ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonBody; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Examples #### Simple Json object When creating simple json structures the difference between the two approaches isn&apos;t big. ##### JSON ```json { &quot;bar&quot;: &quot;Bar&quot;, &quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot; } ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonBody() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;) ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build() ``` #### An array of arrays When we come to more complex constructs with arrays and nested objects the beauty of lambdas become visible! ##### JSON ```json [ [&quot;a1&quot;, &quot;a2&quot;], [1, 2], [{&quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot;}] ] ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) .closeArray() .array() .numberValue(1) .numberValue(2) .closeArray() .array() .object() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .closeObject() .closeArray() ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonArray((rootArray) -&gt; { rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;).stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.numberValue(1).numberValue(2)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.object((o) -&gt; o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;)); }).build() ```