Download JAR files tagged by problematic with all dependencies

A Utility for making an ORM managed object graph safe for sending to a client by pruning out database proxies circular references and other problematic items

This module was created to fix issue DIRSHARED-91 where the embedded Felix instance inside the default LdapCodecService implementation was making it very problematic to deploy the ldap-codec inside an RCP (OSGi) environment and hence Apache Directory Studio could not use it. This module is most likely temporary and will disappear once we are fully OSGi enabled. This module is a plain old jar, not a bundle to avoid accidental reuse as an OSGi module because it contains the version of the LdapCodecService that embeds Felix to make controls and extended ops pluggable in the codec.

This module groups all different output writers. Different output writers have different dependencies. To ensure that those dependencies do not leak to other output writer, or that we can limit to number of dependencies at runtime, output writers are split into separate modules based on the dependencies they use. For example, the CloudWatch output writers depends on the AWS SDK, which is quite large and not used by any other output writer. If you only want to send metrics to Graphite, there should be no need to have the AWS SDK in your classpath at runtime. Some dependencies are also problematic. They can introduce incompatibilities. For example, a few writers are based directly on log4j or logback. This direct dependence breaks the use of SLF4J. By isolating those output writers to a specific module, we can ensure this has minimal impact.

This module was created to fix issue DIRSHARED-91 where the embedded Felix instance inside the default LdapCodecService implementation was making it very problematic to deploy the ldap-codec inside an RCP (OSGi) environment and hence Apache Directory Studio could not use it. This module is most likely temporary and will disappear once we are fully OSGi enabled. This module is a plain old jar, not a bundle to avoid accidental reuse as an OSGi module because it contains the version of the LdapCodecService that embeds Felix to make controls and extended ops pluggable in the codec.

GlassFish build depends on properly functioning several custom lifecycle mappings and artifact handlers. Because these are necessary to resolve dependencies and to run "gf:run" goal and etc., it is critical that these extensions be made available to Maven early on during Maven execution. This definition was originally in maven-glassfish-plugin, which was integrated into Maven POM through <plugin>/<extensions>true marking, but after a series of debugging to resolve artifact resolution failure problems, it turns out that that doesn't cause Maven to load components early enough. I tried to circumbent the prolem by also registering the maven-glassfish-plugin as an extension module (via <build>/<extensions/<extension>), but that apparently confuses Maven to no end --- I get build errors like this: [INFO] Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:2.1:jar': Unable to find the mojo 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:2.1:jar' in the plugin 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin' This is obviously one of the problematic areas of Maven, so to avoid doing hack over hack, I'm simply moving the component definitions to its own module.

GlassFish build depends on properly functioning several custom lifecycle mappings and artifact handlers. Because these are necessary to resolve dependencies and to run "gf:run" goal and etc., it is critical that these extensions be made available to Maven early on during Maven execution. This definition was originally in maven-glassfish-plugin, which was integrated into Maven POM through <plugin>/<extensions>true marking, but after a series of debugging to resolve artifact resolution failure problems, it turns out that that doesn't cause Maven to load components early enough. I tried to circumbent the prolem by also registering the maven-glassfish-plugin as an extension module (via <build>/<extensions/<extension>), but that apparently confuses Maven to no end --- I get build errors like this: [INFO] Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:2.1:jar': Unable to find the mojo 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:2.1:jar' in the plugin 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin' This is obviously one of the problematic areas of Maven, so to avoid doing hack over hack, I'm simply moving the component definitions to its own module.

This is the main aggregator for all gwt submodules. All gwt-specific code resides here. Submodules should avoid inheriting from each other unless necessary. This goes for maven structure and gwt.xml structure. The super module is where our jre emulation layer and super-source live; all modules should inherit super, and a minimum of other modules. Some modules, like injection, are fulfilling an api in the core module, and should be accessed only through core service interfaces. Other modules, like reflection, are capable of being standalone inherits, but can benefit from core utilities like injection, so, two (or more) .gwt.xml modules may be provided. As XApi nears 1.0, all submodules will be routinely stitched together into an uber-jar, in order to have a single jar with a single gwt module that can provide all of the services at once. Internal projects will never use the uber jar, to help maintain modularity, but external projects that want to use more than one service will certainly prefer inheriting one artifact, instead of twelve. When distributed in uber-jar format, it will likely be necessary for either the uber jar, or just xapi-gwt-api.jar to appear before gwt-dev on your compile-time classpath. If using gwt-maven-plugin, the gwtFirstOnClasspath option may become problematic. If so, we will provide a forked gwt-plugin to make sure our compiler enhancements are included in the build process. There is also work going on to make a super-source-everything plugin, which will use maven to find source files, and generate synthetic .gwt.xml for you, as part of an effort to create a wholly unified programming environment. In addition to java-to-javascript, we intend to compile java-to-java and possibly other languages, like go; imagine implementing gwt deferred binding to eliminate cross-platform differences between server environments, or operating systems, or versions of a platform, or anywhere else a core api needs to bind to multiple implementations, depending on the runtime environment.